Using participatory research to identify actionable facilitators and barriers to effective inpatient interdisciplinary communication

被引:3
作者
Jenkins, Ashley M. M. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Weber, Danielle E. E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Arfaa, Jennifer Jasmine E. [4 ]
Arken, Andrew
Clark, Danielle L. L. [2 ]
Dobbs, Emily [5 ]
Lahbabi, Betina [4 ]
Myers, Kurt [4 ]
Tu, Jamie [4 ]
Clarke-Myers, Katherine [6 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp, Div Hosp Med, Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Pediat, Coll Med, Cincinnati, OH USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Northern Kentucky Univ, Dept Biol, Highland Hts, KY USA
[6] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp, Heart Inst, Med Ctr, Qual & Value, Cincinnati, OH USA
[7] Univ Rochester, Div Hosp Med, Med Ctr, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PATIENT OUTCOMES; ROUNDS; IMPACT; TEAMWORK; PHYSICIANS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1002/jhm.13013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundCommunication failures occur often in the inpatient setting. Efforts to understand and improve communication often exclude patients or are siloed by discipline. ObjectiveWe aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to effective communication within interdisciplinary inpatient internal medicine (IM) teams using a participatory research approach. DesignWe conducted a single-center participatory mixed methods study using group-level assessment (GLA) and concept mapping to iteratively engage stakeholders. Stakeholder groups included patients/families, IM faculty, IM residents, nurses and ancillary staff, and care managers. Stakeholder-specific GLA sessions were conducted. Participants responded to prompts addressing interdisciplinary communication then worked in small groups to synthesize the qualitative data into unique ideas. A subset of each stakeholder group then sorted ideas through a concept mapping exercise. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were used to generate a concept map of the data. ResultsParticipants generated 97 unique ideas that were then sorted. The research team chose an eight-cluster concept map representing patient inclusion and engagement, processes and resources, team morale and inclusive dynamics, attitudes and behaviors, effective communication, barriers to communication, the culture of healthcare, and clear expectations. Three larger domains of patient inclusion and engagement, organizational conditions and role clarity, and team dynamics and behaviors were noted. ConclusionUse of a participatory research approach made it feasible to engage diverse stakeholders including patients. Our results highlight the need to identify context-specific facilitators and barriers of interdisciplinary communication. The importance of clear expectations was identified as a prioritized area to target communication improvement efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 138
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Aston Judy, 2005, Int J Nurs Pract, V11, P206
  • [2] Structure and outcomes of interdisciplinary rounds in hospitalized medicine patients: A systematic review and suggested taxonomy
    Bhamidipati, V. Surekha
    Elliott, Daniel J.
    Justice, Ellen M.
    Belleh, Ene
    Sonnad, Seema S.
    Robinson, Edmondo J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2016, 11 (07) : 513 - 523
  • [3] Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review
    Bombard, Yvonne
    Baker, G. Ross
    Orlando, Elaina
    Fancott, Carol
    Bhatia, Pooja
    Casalino, Selina
    Onate, Kanecy
    Denis, Jean-Louis
    Pomey, Marie-Pascale
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
  • [4] An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public health research method
    Burke, JG
    O'Campo, P
    Peak, GL
    Gielen, AC
    McDonnell, KA
    Trochim, WMK
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (10) : 1392 - 1410
  • [5] Inpatient Communication Barriers and Drivers When Caring for Limited English Proficiency Children
    Choe, Angela Y.
    Unaka, Ndidi I.
    Schondelmeyer, Amanda C.
    Bignall, Whitney J. Raglin
    Vilvens, Heather L.
    Thomson, Joanna E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2019, 14 (10) : 607 - 613
  • [6] Improving Teamwork and Patient Outcomes with Daily Structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds: A Multimethod Evaluation
    Clay-Williams, Robyn
    Plumb, Jennifer
    Luscombe, Georgina M.
    Hawke, Catherine
    Dalton, Hazel
    Shannon, Gabriel
    Johnson, Julie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2018, 13 (05) : 311 - 317
  • [7] Who represents me? A patient-derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs)
    Dukhanin, Vadim
    Feeser, Scott
    Berkowitz, Scott A.
    DeCamp, Matthew
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2020, 23 (01) : 148 - 158
  • [8] The Impact of Bedside Interdisciplinary Rounds on Length of Stay and Complications
    Dunn, Andrew S.
    Reyna, Maria
    Radbill, Brian
    Parides, Michael
    Colgan, Claudia
    Osio, Tobi
    Benson, Ari
    Brown, Nicole
    Cambe, Joy
    Zwerling, Margo
    Egorova, Natalia
    Kaplan, Harold
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2017, 12 (03) : 137 - 142
  • [9] Patient and Family Advisory Councils (PFACs): Identifying Challenges and Solutions to Support Engagement in Research
    Harrison, James D.
    Anderson, Wendy G.
    Fagan, Maureen
    Robinson, Edmondo
    Schnipper, Jeffrey
    Symczak, Gina
    Hanson, Catherine
    Carnie, Martha B.
    Banta, Jim
    Chen, Sherry
    Duong, Jonathan
    Wong, Celene
    Auerbach, Andrew D.
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2018, 11 (04) : 413 - 423
  • [10] The Effects of Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds on Patient Centeredness, Quality of Care, and Team Collaboration: A Systematic Review
    Heip, Tine
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Malfait, Simon
    Van Biesen, Wim
    Eeckloo, Kristof
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2022, 18 (01) : E40 - E44