共 50 条
Safety of SABA Monotherapy in Asthma Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
被引:11
作者:
Sriprasart, Thitiwat
[1
,2
]
Waterer, Grant
[3
]
Garcia, Gabriel
[4
]
Rubin, Adalberto
[5
]
Loustaunau Andrade, Marco Antonio
[6
]
Roguska, Agnieszka
[7
]
Phansalkar, Abhay
[8
]
Fulmali, Sourabh
[8
]
Martin, Amber
[9
]
Mittal, Lalith
[10
]
Aggarwal, Bhumika
[11
]
Levy, Gur
[12
]
机构:
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med, 1873 Rama 4 Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] King Chulalongkorn Mem Hosp, Thai Red Cross Soc, 1873 Rama 4 Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[3] Univ Western Australia, Royal Perth Hosp, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Hosp Rossi, Pneumol, La Plata, Argentina
[5] Fed Univ Porto Alegre UFCSPA, Pulm Dept, Santa Casa Hosp, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[6] ISSSTECALI UABC, Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
[7] GSK, Warsaw, Poland
[8] GSK, Gen Med, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[9] Evidera, Waltham, MA USA
[10] Evidera, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
[11] GSK, Gen Med, Singapore, Singapore
[12] GSK, Resp Med Emerging Markets, Panama City, Panama
基金:
芬兰科学院;
关键词:
Monotherapy;
Overuse;
Adults;
Adolescents;
Adverse events;
Mortality;
SABA;
Safety;
METERED-DOSE INHALER;
FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
BUDESONIDE-FORMOTEROL;
PERSISTENT ASTHMA;
POWDER INHALER;
EFFICACY;
MODERATE;
PLACEBO;
SALMETEROL;
D O I:
10.1007/s12325-022-02356-2
中图分类号:
R-3 [医学研究方法];
R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号:
1001 ;
摘要:
Introduction Short-acting beta(2)-agonist (SABA) reliever overuse is common in asthma, despite availability of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-based maintenance therapies, and may be associated with increased risk of adverse events (AEs). This systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the safety and tolerability of SABA reliever monotherapy for adults and adolescents with asthma, through analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence. Methods An SLR of English-language publications between January 1996 and December 2021 included RCTs and observational studies of patients aged >= 12 years treated with inhaled SABA reliever monotherapy (fixed dose or as needed) for >= 4 weeks. Studies of terbutaline and fenoterol were excluded. Meta-analysis feasibility was dependent on cross-trial data comparability. A random-effects model estimated rates of mortality, serious AEs (SAEs), and discontinuation due to AEs (DAEs) for as-needed and fixed-dose SABA treatment groups. ICS monotherapy and SABA therapy were compared using a fixed-effects model. Results Forty-two studies were identified by the SLR for assessment of feasibility. Final meta-analysis included 24 RCTs. Too few observational studies (n = 2) were available for inclusion in the meta-analysis. One death unrelated to treatment was reported in each of the ICS, ICS + LABA, and fixed-dose SABA groups. No other treatment-related deaths were reported. SAE and DAE rates were < 4%. DAEs were reported more frequently in the SABA treatment groups than with ICS, potentially owing to worsening asthma symptoms being classified as an AE. SAE risk was comparable between SABA and ICS treatments. Conclusions Meta-analysis of data from RCTs showed that deaths were rare with SABA reliever monotherapy, and rates of SAEs and DAEs were comparable between SABA reliever and ICS treatment groups. When used appropriately within prescribed limits as reliever therapy, SABA does not contribute to excess rates of mortality, SAEs, or DAEs.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 158
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条