Global knowledge centrality: co-inventor collaboration with China

被引:4
作者
Salmon, Jessica [1 ]
Zaman, Salma [2 ]
Satoglu, Emine Beyza [3 ]
Sanchez-Henriquez, Fernando [4 ]
Velez-Calle, Andres [5 ]
机构
[1] Siena Coll, Loudonville, NY USA
[2] Lahore Univ Management Sci, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Izmir, Turkey
[4] Univ Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
[5] Univ EAFIT, Medellin, Colombia
关键词
Innovation; International knowledge networks; Co-inventor cooperation; Centrality; International collaboration; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY-RIGHTS; NETWORK CENTRALITY; INNOVATION PERFORMANCE; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; SOCIAL-STRUCTURE; PATENT RIGHTS; OUTWARD FDI; DETERMINANTS; CORRUPTION; GUANXI;
D O I
10.1108/IJOEM-04-2021-0597
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper examines the role of co-inventor collaboration with China and/or the USA on a country's increase in centrality in global knowledge networks. It also explores the role of specific institutional factors - corruption and intellectual property rights (IPR) protection - on this relationship. Design/methodology/approach In the study, co-inventor data from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) applications have been used to construct networks of technological knowledge collaboration at the country level over the years 2002-2015. Using eigenvector centrality as the dependent variable, the study uses fixed effect regression analyses on a panel of 171 countries, contributing to recent debates on knowledge networks and international cooperation. Findings Building on research in economic development, innovation and social network theory, this research finds that co-patenting with Chinese inventors is positively related to a country's centrality in global knowledge networks and that this relationship is negatively moderated by collaboration with the current most central knowledge network - namely that of the USA - suggesting a substitution effect. It also finds a partial substitution between institutional factors, IPRs protection and transparency, and collaboration with China on a country's knowledge centrality. Practical implications Regarding policymakers, the findings can be used to encourage international collaboration for increased access to new sources of knowledge that fosters innovation while keeping a close eye on local institutions, especially emerging economies that want to increase their international knowledge network centrality. Originality/value This study creates a unique panel data set and extends the social networks approach in international business literature, focusing on institutional characteristics related to participation in knowledge networks.
引用
收藏
页码:3676 / 3702
页数:27
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]   Patent rights and innovative activity: Evidence from national and firm-level data [J].
Allred, Brent B. ;
Park, Walter G. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2007, 38 (06) :878-900
[2]   DYADIC BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN A BUSINESS NETWORK CONTEXT [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
HAKANSSON, H ;
JOHANSON, J .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1994, 58 (04) :1-15
[3]   Technology, innovation and knowledge: The importance of ideas and international connectivity [J].
Andersson, Ulf ;
Dasi, Angels ;
Mudambi, Ram ;
Pedersen, Torben .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2016, 51 (01) :153-162
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, World Economic League Table 2021
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, STUDIES TRANSITION S
[6]   Corruption in international business: A review and research agenda [J].
Bahoo, Salman ;
Alon, Ilan ;
Paltrinieri, Andrea .
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2020, 29 (04)
[7]  
Baltagi B.H., 2008, Econometric analysis of panel data, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5
[8]   Buzz-and-Pipeline Dynamics: Towards a Knowledge-Based Multiplier Model of Clusters [J].
Bathelt, Harald .
GEOGRAPHY COMPASS, 2007, 1 (06) :1282-1298
[9]   Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness [J].
Bell, GG .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :287-295
[10]   Are patents with multiple inventors from different countries a good indicator of international R&D collaboration? The case of ABB [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Bruzelius, Maria .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (10) :1321-1334