An assessment of renewable energy development in Belt and Road Initiative countries: An entropy and TOPSIS approach

被引:23
作者
An, Yan [1 ]
Tan, Xianchun [2 ]
Gu, Baihe [2 ]
Zhu, Kaiwei [2 ]
Shi, Lijuan [3 ]
Ding, Ziyuan [4 ]
机构
[1] China Inst Nucl Ind Strategy, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] China Ind Control Syst Cyber Emergency Response Te, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Boston Univ, Grad Sch Art & Sci, Boston, MA USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Renewable energy development; The Belt and Road Initiative countries; Entropy weight; TOPSIS method; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; RISK-ASSESSMENT; WEIGHT METHOD; SOLAR-ENERGY; MCDM; INVESTMENT; TURKEY; CHINA; WIND;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.085
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The development of renewable energy is a significant global factor in the achievement of a green economic recovery after the epidemic, and to enhance sustainable social development in the future. However, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries are experiencing regional differences in renewable energy development owing to the different economic and social levels. It is of theoretical and practical significance to assess the situation of renewable energy development in BRI countries, in order to identify the advantages and disadvantages of renewable energy development and to enhance energy cooperation between countries. In this paper, a multidimensional assessment for BRI countries (47 countries/regions across Asia, Europe, Africa, the Americas, and Oceania) was carried out based on empirical data, (including institutional, economic, technological, energy and environmental facets). The Entropy Weight Method and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) were selected to assess the level of renewable energy development in BRI countries during the period 2009-2017. The results demonstrated that BRI countries/regions had a low overall level of renewable energy development during the study period, but a stable and rising development trend was identifiable. For example, certain countries/regions (e.g. Mainland China, Indonesia, Pakistan, Russia, South Africa and New Zealand) experienced significant growth during the period. When analyzed by continents, the Americas and Oceania had the highest level of renewable energy development, followed by Europe, with Asia and Africa ranking lowest. Europe and Oceania's notable advantages in "institutional and economic facets" were primarily as a result of the enhanced governance capability and superior economic development. The superior maturity of renewable energy technology in the Americas and Oceania contributes to the superior performance in the "technological facet". The countries with superior development in the "energy and environmental facets" are located in Asia, Oceania and Europe.
引用
收藏
页码:3545 / 3560
页数:16
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   Evaluation of strategic energy alternatives determined for Northern Cyprus with SWOT based MCDM integrated approach [J].
Akcaba, Soley ;
Eminer, Fehiman .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 :11022-11038
[2]   The state of renewable energy development in South Africa: An overview [J].
Akinbami, Olusola M. ;
Oke, Samuel R. ;
Bodunrin, Michael O. .
ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2021, 60 (06) :5077-5093
[3]   Quantitative assessment of sustainable renewable energy through soft computing: Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method [J].
Alghassab, Mohammed .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 :12139-12152
[4]   Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through a hybrid MCDM method [J].
Alizadeh, Reza ;
Soltanisehat, Leili ;
Lund, Peter D. ;
Zamanisabzi, Hamed .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 137
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Renewable Energy Prospects: China
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, The World Bank Database
[7]   Prioritizing strategies to eliminate barriers to renewable energy adoption and development in Ghana: A CRITIC-fuzzy TOPSIS approach [J].
Asante, Dennis ;
Ampah, Jeffrey Dankwa ;
Afrane, Sandylove ;
Adjei-Darko, Peter ;
Asante, Bismark ;
Fosu, Edward ;
Dankwah, Dennis Ampah ;
Amoh, Prince Oppong .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 195 :47-65
[8]   Renewable energy consumption, financial development, environmental pollution, and innovations in the ASEAN thorn+3 group: Evidence from (P-ARDL) model [J].
Assi, Ala Fathi ;
Isiksal, Aliya Zhakanova ;
Tursoy, Turgut .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 165 :689-700
[9]   Determinants of foreign direct investment in BRICS- does renewable and non-renewable energy matter? [J].
Azam, Muhammad ;
Haseeb, Muhammad .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2021, 35
[10]  
Banik D., 2018, Can China's Belt and Road Initiative help achieve the SDGs?