The impact of blockchain on restricting the misuse of green loans in a capital-constrained supply chain

被引:10
作者
Wang, Minxue [1 ]
Li, Bo [1 ]
Song, Dongping [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Management, Liverpool, England
关键词
Supply chain management; Blockchain; Information validity; Capital constraint; Misusing green loans; TRADE CREDIT; DISCLOSURE; MANAGEMENT; OPERATIONS; EFFICIENCY; FINANCE; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2023.11.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Nowadays, green loans have been widely promoted to support the capital-constrained supply chain under carbon regulation. However, the borrowers in the supply chain may use the preferential green loans for other purposes which are not related to green development. That phenomenon is mainly attributed to the lack of valid information investigation under traditional information technology. Blockchain, as an innovative technology, can provide valid financial information and identify liability in the use of green loans, which could be an effective tool to restrict the misuse behavior. But will the high operating cost weaken the advantage of blockchain? To address this question, we consider a supply chain system composed of a supplier and a capital-constrained manufacturer. The manufacturer may misuse part of the green loans to purchase primary components from the supplier. Two operational modes corresponding to no-blockchain adoption (N case) and blockchain adoption (B case) are designed, in which the supplier determines the wholesale price, and the manufacturer determines the order quantity under green loans. By comparing the optimal decisions of supply chain members, we put forward and differentiate three types of effects: the carbon regulation effect, the information verification effect, and the blockchain cost effect, which influence the adoption of blockchain technology in the supply chain. In addition, we show that blockchain can restrict the misused amount of green loans and improve the environmental performance, but decrease the consumer surplus.
引用
收藏
页码:980 / 996
页数:17
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Green credit financing versus trade credit financing in a supply chain with carbon emission limits
    An, Simin
    Li, Bo
    Song, Dongping
    Chen, Xue
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 292 (01) : 125 - 142
  • [2] Pollution Regulation of Competitive Markets
    Anand, Krishnan S.
    Giraud-Carrier, Francois C.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 66 (09) : 4193 - 4206
  • [3] Anyfantaki S., 2022, Green finance in Europe: Actors and challenges
  • [4] A systematic literature review of blockchain technology and environmental sustainability: Status quo and future research*,**
    Arshad, Ameena
    Shahzad, Faisal
    Rehman, Ijaz Ur
    Sergi, Bruno S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 88 : 1602 - 1622
  • [5] Distributed Ledgers and Operations: What Operations Management Researchers Should Know About Blockchain Technology
    Babich, Volodymyr
    Hilary, Gilles
    [J]. M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 22 (02) : 223 - 240
  • [6] Berensmann K., 2019, CORPORATE SOCIAL RES, P305
  • [7] Traceability vs. sustainability in supply chains: The implications of blockchain
    Biswas, Debajyoti
    Jalali, Hamed
    Ansaripoor, Amir H.
    De Giovanni, Pietro
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 305 (01) : 128 - 147
  • [8] CASH GENERATION IN BUSINESS OPERATIONS - SOME SIMULATION MODELS
    BUDIN, M
    EAPEN, AT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1970, 25 (05) : 1091 - 1107
  • [9] The Roles of Bank and Trade Credits: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Evidence
    Cai, Gangshu
    Chen, Xiangfeng
    Xiao, Zhiguo
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 23 (04) : 583 - 598
  • [10] Industry's 4.0 transformation process: how to start, where to aim, what to be aware of
    Calabrese, Armando
    Dora, Manoj
    Ghiron, Nathan Levialdi
    Tiburzi, Luigi
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2022, 33 (05) : 492 - 512