Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Primary Fingertip Reconstruction Using a Reverse Homodigital Island Flap: A Systematic Review

被引:6
|
作者
Xu, Joshua [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Cao, Jacob Y. [1 ]
Graham, David J. [3 ]
Lawson, Richard D. [2 ]
Sivakumar, Brahman S. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[2] Royal North Shore Hosp, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[3] Gold Coast Univ Hosp, Southport, Qld, Australia
[4] Hornsby Ku Ring Gai Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Royal North Shore Hosp, Dept Hand & Peripheral Nerve Surg, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
来源
HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY | 2023年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
flap; homodigital; reverse-flow; finger; fracture/dislocation; diagnosis; trauma; microsurgery; specialty; systematic review; ARTERY FLAP; INJURIES;
D O I
10.1177/15589447211003179
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundReverse homodigital island flaps (RHIFs) are increasingly used to reconstruct traumatic fingertip injuries, but there is limited evidence on the efficacy of this technique. We performed a systematic review of the literature to establish the safety and functional outcomes of RHIF for traumatic fingertip injuries.MethodsElectronic searches were performed using 3 databases (PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL) from their date of inception to April 2020. Relevant studies were required to report on complications and functional outcomes for patients undergoing RHIF for primary fingertip reconstruction. Data were extracted from included studies and analyzed.ResultsSixteen studies were included, which produced a total cohort of 459 patients with 495 fingertip injuries. The index and middle fingers were involved most frequently (34.6% and 34.1%, respectively), followed by the ring finger (22%), the little finger (6.7%), and the thumb (2.6%). The mean postoperative static and moving 2-point discrimination was 7.2 and 6.7 mm, respectively. The mean time to return to work was 8.4 weeks. The mean survivorship was 98.4%, with the pooled complication rate being 28%. The pooled complication rate of complete flap necrosis was 3.6%, of partial flap necrosis was 10.3%, of venous congestion was 14.6%, of pain or hypersensitivity was 11.5%, of wound infection was 7.2%, of flexion contractures was 6.3%, and of cold intolerance was 17.7%.ConclusionsReverse homodigital island flaps can be performed safely with excellent outcomes. To minimize complications, care is taken during dissection and insetting, with extensive rehabilitation adhered to postoperatively. Prospective studies assessing outcomes of RHIF compared with other reconstruction techniques would be beneficial.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 271
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reconstruction of the medial patellotibial ligament results in favorable clinical outcomes: a systematic review
    Charles A. Baumann
    Eli L. Pratte
    Seth L. Sherman
    Elizabeth A. Arendt
    Betina B. Hinckel
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2018, 26 : 2920 - 2933
  • [42] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Part 1: Systematic review of clinical and functional outcomes
    Samitier, Gonzalo
    Alentorn-Geli, Eduard
    Torrens, Carlos
    Wright, Thomas W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHOULDER SURGERY, 2015, 9 (01): : 24 - 31
  • [43] Reverse Superficial Palmar branch of Radial artery pedicled flap for Palmar and Digital reconstruction: A systematic review of literature with a retrospective case review
    Appukuttan, Aswin
    Loh, Charles Yuen Yung
    Puente, Marta Marti
    Iwuagwu, Fortune
    JPRAS OPEN, 2021, 29 : 144 - 156
  • [44] Quadriceps tendon autograft with or without bone block have comparable clinical outcomes, complications and revision rate for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review
    Meena, Amit
    D'Ambrosi, Riccardo
    Runer, Armin
    Raj, Akshya
    Attri, Manish
    Abermann, Elisabeth
    Hoser, Christian
    Fink, Christian
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2023, 31 (06) : 2274 - 2288
  • [45] Quadriceps tendon autograft with or without bone block have comparable clinical outcomes, complications and revision rate for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review
    Amit Meena
    Riccardo D’Ambrosi
    Armin Runer
    Akshya Raj
    Manish Attri
    Elisabeth Abermann
    Christian Hoser
    Christian Fink
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2023, 31 : 2274 - 2288
  • [46] Investigating the Association between Preflap Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Surgical Outcomes in Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Rocks, Madeline C.
    Wu, Meagan
    Comunale, Victoria
    Agrawal, Nikhil
    Nicholas, Rebecca S.
    Azad, Ali
    Hacquebord, Jacques H.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2024,
  • [47] A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO EMERGENT BREAST FREE FLAP TAKEBACK: CLINICAL OUTCOMES, ALGORITHM, AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    Khansa, Ibrahim
    Chao, Albert H.
    Taghizadeh, Maakan
    Nagel, Theodore
    Wang, Duane
    Tiwari, Pankaj
    MICROSURGERY, 2013, 33 (07) : 505 - 513
  • [48] Outcomes of Muscle versus Fasciocutaneous Free Flap Reconstruction in Acute Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Arellano, Jose Antonio
    Alessandri-Bonetti, Mario
    Liu, Hilary Y.
    Pandya, Sumaarg
    Egro, Francesco M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (08)
  • [49] Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with primary cardiac angiosarcoma: A systematic review
    Chambergo-Michilot, Diego
    de la Cruz-Ku, Gabriel
    Sterner, Rosalie M.
    Branez-Condorena, Ana
    Guerra-Canchari, Pedro
    Stulak, John
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC RESEARCH, 2023, 15 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [50] Surgical outcomes of profunda artery perforator flap in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marchi, Filippo
    Iandelli, Andrea
    Pace, Gian Marco
    Bellini, Elisa
    Tirrito, Alessandro
    Costantino, Andrea
    Cerri, Luca
    Greco, Antonio
    Polimeni, Antonella
    Parrinello, Giampiero
    Peretti, Giorgio
    De Virgilio, Armando
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2025, 47 (01): : 98 - 111