Association between gut microbiota and sensorineural hearing loss: a Mendelian randomization study

被引:8
作者
Yin, Qiuyuan [1 ]
Shi, Guolin [2 ]
Zhu, Lei [1 ]
机构
[1] Yunnan Univ, Sch Life Sci, State Key Lab Conservat & Utilizat Bioresources, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Neurosurg, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
关键词
sensorineural hearing loss; gut microbiota; gut-inner ear axis; Mendelian randomization study; causal effect; GENETIC-VARIANTS; BARRIER; DISEASE;
D O I
10.3389/fmicb.2023.1230125
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
BackgroundSeveral recent studies speculated that the gut microbiota is associated with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and proposed the concept of the gut-inner ear axis. However, the causal effect of gut microbiota on SNHL is still unknown. In this study, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to estimate the causal effect of gut microbiota on SNHL.MethodsGut microbiota data were obtained from the largest available genome-wide association study (n = 18,340) conducted by the MiBioGen consortium. The summary statistics of SNHL were obtained from the FinnGen consortium R8 release data (28,310 cases and 302,750 controls). The causal effects were estimated with inverse-variance weighted, MR-Egger, and weighted median. Reverse Mendelian randomization analysis was performed on the bacteria that were found to be associated with SNHL in forward Mendelian randomization analysis. We then performed sensitivity analyses, including Cochran's Q-test, MR-Egger intercept test, MR-PRESSO, cML-MA-BIC, and leave-one-out analysis, to detect heterogeneity and pleiotropy.ResultsThe inverse-variance weighted results suggested that Lachnospiraceae (UCG001) had a significant protective effect against SNHL (odds ratio = 0.85, 95% confidence interval: 0.78-0.93, P = 6.99 x 10-4). In addition, Intestinimonas (odds ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.97, P = 8.53 x 10-3) presented a suggestively protective effect on SNHL. Rikenellaceae (RC9gutgroup) (odds ratio = 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.15, P = 0.01) and Eubacterium (hallii group) (odds ratio = 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.24, P = 0.048) suggestively increase the risk of SNHL. The results of the reverse MR analysis showed that there is no significant causal effect of SNHL on the gut microbiota. No significant heterogeneity of instrumental variables or pleiotropy was detected.ConclusionThe evidence that the four genera mentioned above are associated with SNHL supports the hypothesis of a gut-inner ear axis. Our study provides microbial markers for the prevention and treatment of SNHL, and further studies are needed to explore the mechanisms of the gut microbiome-inner ear axis in health and diseases.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   High-Fat Proteins Drive Dynamic Changes in Gut Microbiota, Hepatic Metabolome, and Endotoxemia-TLR-4-NFκB-Mediated Inflammation in Mice [J].
Ahmad, Muhammad Ijaz ;
Ijaz, Muhammad Umair ;
Hussain, Muzhair ;
ul Haq, Ijaz ;
Zhao, Di ;
Li, Chunbao .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2020, 68 (42) :11710-11725
[2]   Evolving trends in next-generation probiotics: a 5W1H perspective [J].
Almeida, Diana ;
Machado, Daniela ;
Andrade, Jose Carlos ;
Mendo, Sonia ;
Gomes, Ana Maria ;
Freitas, Ana Cristina .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2020, 60 (11) :1783-1796
[3]   The blood-brain barrier as a regulatory interface in the gut-brain axes [J].
Banks, William A. .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2006, 89 (04) :472-476
[4]   Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting [J].
Boef, Anna G. C. ;
Dekkers, Olaf M. ;
le Cessie, Saskia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (02) :496-511
[5]   Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression [J].
Bowden, Jack ;
Smith, George Davey ;
Burgess, Stephen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (02) :512-525
[6]   The gut microbiota influences blood-brain barrier permeability in mice [J].
Braniste, Viorica ;
Al-Asmakh, Maha ;
Kowal, Czeslawa ;
Anuar, Farhana ;
Abbaspour, Afrouz ;
Toth, Miklos ;
Korecka, Agata ;
Bakocevic, Nadja ;
Ng, Lai Guan ;
Kundu, Parag ;
Gulyas, Balazs ;
Halldin, Christer ;
Hultenby, Kjell ;
Nilsson, Harriet ;
Hebert, Hans ;
Volpe, Bruce T. ;
Diamond, Betty ;
Pettersson, Sven .
SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2014, 6 (263)
[7]   Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies [J].
Brion, Marie-Jo A. ;
Shakhbazov, Konstantin ;
Visscher, Peter M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (05) :1497-1501
[8]   Comparative genomics and physiology of the butyrate-producing bacterium Intestinimonas butyriciproducens [J].
Bui, Thi Phuong Nam ;
Shetty, Sudarshan Anand ;
Lagkouvardos, Ilias ;
Ritari, Jarmo ;
Chamlagain, Bhawani ;
Douillard, Francois P. ;
Paulin, Lars ;
Piironen, Vieno ;
Clavel, Thomas ;
Plugge, Caroline M. ;
de Vos, Willem M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY REPORTS, 2016, 8 (06) :1024-1037
[9]  
Burgess S, 2017, EUR J EPIDEMIOL, V32, P377, DOI 10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x
[10]   Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods [J].
Burgess, Stephen ;
Dudbridge, Frank ;
Thompson, Simon G. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (11) :1880-1906