Older adult patient preferences for the content and format of prescription medication labels - A best-worst scaling and discrete choice experiment study

被引:2
作者
Malhotra, Rahul [1 ,2 ,10 ]
Suppiah, Sumithra Devi [1 ]
Tan, Yi Wen [1 ]
Sung, Pildoo [1 ]
Tay, Sarah Siew Cheng [3 ]
Tan, Ngiap Chuan [3 ]
Koh, Gerald Choon-Huat [4 ]
Chan, Alexandre [5 ]
Chew, Lita Sui Tjien [6 ,7 ]
Ozdemir, Semra [2 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Duke NUS Med Sch, Ctr Ageing Res & Educ, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Duke NUS Med Sch, Signature Programme Hlth Serv & Syst Res, Singapore, Singapore
[3] SingHlth Polyclin, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Univ Calif, Dept Clin Pharm Practice, Irvin, CA USA
[6] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Dept Pharm, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Pharm, Singapore, Singapore
[8] Duke NUS Med Sch, Lien Ctr Palliat Care, Singapore, Singapore
[9] Duke Univ, Duke Clin Res Inst, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Durham, NC USA
[10] Duke NUS Med Sch, Ctr Ageing Res & Educ, Signature Programme Hlth Serv & Syst Res, 8 Coll Rd,Level 4, Singapore 169857, Singapore
关键词
Discrete choice experiment; Best -worst scaling; Patient preference; Prescription medication labels; Pharmacy practice; ELICITATION METHODS; MIXED LOGIT; DRUG LABEL; INFORMATION; READABILITY; LITERACY; EVALUATE; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.07.009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Patient preferences for the content and format of prescription medication labels (PMLs, i.e., sticker labels placed on medication bottles/packets at dispensing) have been extensively studied. However, accommodating all preferences on PMLs is impractical due to space limitations. Understanding how patients prioritise the content and format attributes of PMLs can inform improvements while working within PML space constraints. Objectives: We aimed to (1) identify a ranking of medication-related content attributes to be prioritised on PMLs using best-worst scaling (BWS), and (2) determine the relative importance of format attributes when incorporated onto PMLs using discrete choice experiment (DCE), from the perspective of older adult patients in Singapore. Methods: Attributes were informed by our prior qualitative study and PML best practice guidelines. For the BWS component, the assessed content attributes were indication, precautions, interaction or paired medicines, food instructions, side effects, expiry date, and missed dose action, all of which are currently not legally mandated on PMLs in Singapore. A BWS object case was used to rank the content attributes. For the DCE component, in a series of questions, participants were asked to choose between two PML options each time, that varied in the pre-sentation of dosage-frequency instructions, font size, presentation of dosage, presentation of precautions, and font colour of precautions. A mixed logit model estimated the relative utilities of format attribute levels, enabling the calculation of importance scores of the format attributes.Results: The study recruited 280 participants (mean age: 68.8 +/- 5.4 years). The three most-preferred content attributes were indication, precautions and interaction or paired medicines. The top three format preferences were tabular style presentation of dosage-frequency instructions, large font size and precautions in red colour.Conclusions: Healthcare institutions should consider improving their PMLs based on the leading content and format preferences voiced by older adult patients. The methodology adopted in the study can also be used for aligning the content and format of other patient education materials with patient preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:1455 / 1464
页数:10
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Adamsen J., 2013, MARKET SOCIAL RES, V21, P9
[2]  
Aizaki H, 2018, Non-Market Valuation with R
[3]   Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods [J].
Ali, Shehzad ;
Ronaldson, Sarah .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2012, 103 (01) :21-44
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, PHARM MED, DOI [DOI 10.1007/s40290-014-0059-1, 10.1007/s40290-014-0059-1]
[5]  
Athuraliya N, 2016, J Pharm Policy Pract, V9, P38
[6]   Using best-worst scaling methodology to investigate consumer ethical beliefs across countries [J].
Auger, Pat ;
Devinney, Timothy M. ;
Louviere, Jordan J. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 70 (03) :299-326
[7]  
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2021, National Standard for Labelling Dispensed Medicines
[8]   Advancing Best Practices for Prescription Drug Labeling [J].
Bailey, Stacy Cooper ;
Navaratnam, Prakash ;
Black, Heather ;
Russell, Allison L. ;
Wolf, Michael S. .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2015, 49 (11) :1222-1236
[9]   Information needs and patient perceptions of the quality of medication information available in hospitals: a mixed method study [J].
Bekker, Charlotte L. ;
Naghani, Shaghayegh Mohsenian ;
Natsch, Stephanie ;
Wartenberg, Naomi S. ;
van den Bemt, Bart J. F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2020, 42 (06) :1396-1404
[10]  
California State Board of Pharmacy, 2022, Patient-Centered Prescription Drug Container Label Samples