Revisiting the factor structure of the suicide-related coping scale: Results from two samples of Australian online help-seekers

被引:6
作者
Rainbow, Christopher [1 ,2 ]
Tatnell, Ruth [2 ]
Blashki, Grant [1 ,3 ]
Melvin, Glenn A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Beyond Blue, GPOB 1883, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Ctr Social & Early Emot Dev SEED, Sch Psychol, Level 5,Bldg BC,221 Burwood Hwy, Melbourne, VIC 3125, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Nossal Inst Global Hlth, Level 5,333 Exhibit St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
关键词
Suicide -related coping; Suicidal ideation; Suicidal urges; Scale validation; Factor analysis; RISK-FACTORS; FIT INDEXES; IDEATION; VALIDATION; REPLICATION; VALIDITY; BEHAVIOR; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115195
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The Suicide-Related Coping Scale (SRCS) measures how well a person manages suicidal thoughts through the use of internal and external coping strategies. Many studies using SRCS, including the original scale validation, used samples of treatment-engaged military veterans or personnel, which may limit the generalizability of study findings to other help-seeking and cultural contexts. The present study evaluated factor structure, internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity of SRCS in two Australian online help-seeking samples: visitors to a mental health website with experience of suicidal ideation (N = 1,266) and users of a suicide safety planning mobile app (N = 693). Factor analyses found a reduced 15-item version of the scale (SRCS-15) provided the best fit in both samples, with three factors found: Internal Coping, External Coping and Perceived Control. Internal consistency was good (alpha = 0.89). Strong negative associations were found between SRCS-15, recent suicidal ideation and future suicide intent. Perceived Control demonstrated the strongest associations with suicidal ideation and future suicide intent (negative) and distress tolerance (positive). External Coping demonstrated the strongest associations with help-seeking (positive). Items relating to means restriction and hospital location knowledge were dropped from SRCS-15 due to low factor loadings but may still contain clinically relevant in-formation. SRCS-15 appears to be reliable and valid in capturing aspects of self-efficacy and belief-based barriers to coping, making it a useful additional outcome measure for suicide-related services and interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Aldwin CM., 2021, Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, VNinth, P275, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-816094-7.00016-7
[2]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021, Causes of death
[3]   Maximum likelihood estimation with missing outcomes: From simplicity to complexity [J].
Baker, Stuart G. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (22) :4453-4474
[4]  
Beyond Blue, 2022, NOW SUIC SAF PLANN
[5]   The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? [J].
Brandt, Mark J. ;
IJzerman, Hans ;
Dijksterhuis, Ap ;
Farach, Frank J. ;
Geller, Jason ;
Giner-Sorolla, Roger ;
Grange, James A. ;
Perugini, Marco ;
Spies, Jeffrey R. ;
van 't Veer, Anna .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 50 :217-224
[6]  
Brown TA., 2006, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[7]   ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF ASSESSING MODEL FIT [J].
BROWNE, MW ;
CUDECK, R .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (02) :230-258
[8]   Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) :233-255
[9]   Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development [J].
Clark, LA ;
Watson, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :309-319
[10]   Better off with you: Exploring congruity between caregivers' and Veterans' experience of efforts to cope with suicide [J].
Crasta, Dev ;
Spears, Angela Page ;
Sullivan, Sarah R. ;
Britton, Peter C. ;
Goodman, Marianne .
MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 34 (03) :326-334