Validation of an assessment tool for professionalism in medical students: A mixed method study

被引:0
作者
Khan, Humaira Fayyaz [1 ]
Yasmeen, Raheela [2 ]
Ali, Shabana [3 ]
机构
[1] Riphah Int Univ, Dept Physiol, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Riphah Int Univ, Islamabad, Pakistan
[3] Riphah Int Univ, Dept Anat, Islamabad, Pakistan
关键词
Professionalism; Delphi; Focus group; Medical students; Factor analysis;
D O I
10.47391/JPMA.7770
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop and validate a tool for the assessment of professionalism in medical students during clerkship. Method: The mixed-method study was conducted from February to September 2018 at the Islamic International Medical College, Riphah University, Islamabad, Pakistan. A preliminary focus group discussion was followed by two rounds of Delphi technique to validate micro-scenarios for the relevance of each item of the instrument alongside its content validity. For content and construct validation of the tool, content validity, cognitive validity, cognitive pretesting, confirmatory factor analysis and reliability assessment was done. Piloting was done on medical students doing clerkship. Data was analysed using SPSS 21 and AMOS 21. Results: A 35-item preliminary tool from micro-scenarios generated after focus group discussion was developed for the first Delphi round. For the second round, a 29-item tool was resent to the experts for validation. After the second round, the content validity scale was 0.94. Removal of 1 item produced a 28-item tool. Pre-cognitive testing of the 28 items resulted in rephrasing of 4, modification of 2, and deletion of 1 and a tool with 27 items. Piloting was carried out and after CFA resulted in a reduced 21 item tool. Cronbach's alpha value was 0.96. A good to excellent model fit was produced after performing confirmatory factor analysis. Conclusion: A tool comprising of 21 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale that had acceptable construct validity and good content validity was developed. It can be used to evaluate the level of professionalism of local medical students doing clerkship.
引用
收藏
页码:2177 / 2182
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Medical professionalism: Development and validation of the Arabian LAMPS [J].
Al-Eraky, Mohamed M. ;
Chandratilake, Madawa ;
Wajid, Gohar ;
Donkers, Jeroen ;
van Merrienboer, Jeroen .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 :S56-S62
[2]   Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87 [J].
Artino, Anthony R., Jr. ;
La Rochelle, Jeffrey S. ;
Dezee, Kent J. ;
Gehlbach, Hunter .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2014, 36 (06) :463-474
[3]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[4]   Professionalism in medical education: The development and validation of a survey instrument to assess attitudes toward professionalism [J].
Blackall, George F. ;
Melnick, Steven A. ;
Shoop, Glenda H. ;
George, John ;
Lerner, Susan M. ;
Wilson, Philip K. ;
Pees, Richard C. ;
Kreher, Margaret .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2007, 29 (2-3) :E58-E62
[5]   What we measure ... and what we should measure in medical education [J].
Boulet, John R. ;
Durning, Steven J. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 53 (01) :86-94
[6]  
Brennan T, 2002, OBSTET GYNECOL, V100, P170
[7]   Feedback in the clinical setting [J].
Burgess, Annette ;
van Diggele, Christie ;
Roberts, Chris ;
Mellis, Craig .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (Suppl 2)
[8]   Cultural similarities and differences in medical professionalism: a multi-region study [J].
Chandratilake, Madawa ;
McAleer, Sean ;
Gibson, John .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (03) :257-266
[9]  
Cruess SR, 2009, TEACHING MEDICAL PROFESSIONALISM, P7
[10]   Defining and assessing professional competence [J].
Epstein, RM ;
Hundert, EM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (02) :226-235