Development and validation of an optimal GATE model for proton pencil-beam scanning delivery

被引:2
作者
Asadi, Ali [1 ]
Akhavanallaf, Azadeh [2 ]
Hosseini, Seyed Abolfazl [1 ]
Vosoughi, Naser [1 ]
Zaidi, Habib [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Energy Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Geneva, Neuroctr, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Nucl Med, Odense, Denmark
[6] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK | 2023年 / 33卷 / 04期
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Proton therapy; Monte Carlo simulation; active scanning; AAPM TG-119; prostate; MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS; CARBON-ION THERAPY; DOSE-CALCULATION; OPTIMIZATION; CODE; DISTRIBUTIONS; PARAMETERS; EQUIVALENT; PLATFORM; TOPAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.008
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop and validate a versatile Monte Carlo (MC)-based dose calculation engine to support MC-based dose verification of treatment planning systems (TPSs) and quality assurance (QA) workflows in proton therapy. Methods: The GATE MC toolkit was used to simulate a fixed horizontal active scan-based proton beam delivery (SIEMENS IONTRIS). Within the nozzle, two primary and secondary dose monitors have been designed to enable the comparison of the accuracy of dose estimation from MC simulations with respect to physical QA measurements. The developed beam model was validated against a series of commissioning measurements using pinpoint chambers and 2D array ionization chambers (IC) in terms of lateral profiles and depth dose distributions. Furthermore, beam delivery module and treatment planning has been validated against the literature deploying various clinical test cases of the AAPM TG-119 (c-shape phantom) and a prostate patient. Results: MC simulations showed excellent agreement with measurements in the lateral depth-dose parameters and spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) characteristics within a maximum relative error of 0.95 mm in range, 1.83% in entrance to peak ratio, 0.27% in mean point-to-point dose difference, and 0.32% in peak location. The mean relative absolute difference between MC simulations and measurements in terms of absorbed dose in the SOBP region was 0.93% +/- 0.88%. Clinical phantom studies showed a good agreement compared to research TPS (relative error for TG-119 planning target volume PTV-D95 = 1.8%; and for prostate PTV-D95 = -0.6%). Conclusion: We successfully developed a MC model for the pencil beam scanning system, which appears reliable for dose verification of the TPS in combination with QA information, prior to patient treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 600
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A beam model for focused proton pencil beams
    Almhagen, E.
    Boersma, D. J.
    Nystrom, H.
    Ahnesjo, A.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 52 : 27 - 32
  • [32] Integration and dosimetric validation of a dynamic collimation system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Nelson, Nicholas P.
    Culberson, Wesley S.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    Geoghegan, Theodore J.
    Patwardhan, Kaustubh A.
    Smith, Blake R.
    Flynn, Ryan T.
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Boland, Thibault
    Hill, Patrick M.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2023, 9 (06)
  • [33] Validation and testing of a novel pencil-beam model derived from Monte Carlo simulations in carbon-ion treatment planning for different scenarios
    Zhang, Hui
    Li, Qiang
    Liu, Xinguo
    Shen, Guosheng
    Li, Zheng
    Chen, Weiqiang
    Niu, Ruijun
    Dai, Zhongying
    Xiao, Guoqing
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 99 : 1 - 9
  • [34] Optimization of GEANT4 settings for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning simulations using GATE
    Grevillot, Loic
    Frisson, Thibault
    Zahra, Nabil
    Bertrand, Damien
    Stichelbaut, Frederic
    Freud, Nicolas
    Sarrut, David
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2010, 268 (20) : 3295 - 3305
  • [35] Beam Position Projection Algorithms in Proton Pencil Beam Scanning
    Nesteruk, Konrad P.
    Bradley, Stephen G.
    Kooy, Hanne M.
    Clasie, Benjamin M.
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (11)
  • [36] Evaluation of the ray-casting analytical algorithm for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Winterhalter, Carla
    Zepter, Stefan
    Shim, Sojin
    Meier, Gabriel
    Bolsi, Alessandra
    Fredh, Anna
    Hrbacek, Jan
    Oxley, David
    Zhang, Ye
    Weber, Damien C.
    Lomax, Antony
    Safai, Sairos
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (06)
  • [37] Impact of machine log-files uncertainties on the quality assurance of proton pencil beam scanning treatment delivery
    Toscano, S.
    Souris, K.
    Goma, C.
    Barragan-Montero, A.
    Puydupin, S.
    Vander Stappen, F.
    Janssens, G.
    Matic, A.
    Geets, X.
    Sterpin, E.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (09)
  • [38] Development of a golden beam data set for the commissioning of a proton double-scattering system in a pencil-beam dose calculation algorithm
    Slopsema, R. L.
    Lin, L.
    Flampouri, S.
    Yeung, D.
    Li, Z.
    McDonough, J. E.
    Palta, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (09)
  • [39] Automation of pencil beam scanning proton treatment planning for intracranial tumours
    Placidi, Lorenzo
    Righetto, Roberto
    Vecchi, Claudio
    Zara, Stefania
    Alparone, Alessandro
    Moretti, Roberto
    Amelio, Dante
    Scartoni, Daniele
    Schwarz, Marco
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 105
  • [40] Improving the precision and performance of proton pencil beam scanning
    Safai, Sairos
    Bula, Christian
    Meer, David
    Pedroni, Eros
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 1 (03) : 196 - 206