Are tube fill volumes below 90% a rejection criterion for all coagulation tests?

被引:0
|
作者
Odabasi, Merve Sena [1 ]
Yalcinkaya Kara, Zeynep Mine [1 ]
机构
[1] Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Res & Training Hosp, Dept Biochem, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
coagulation tests; underfilled tube; total allowable error; reference change value; PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME; PREANALYTICAL ERRORS; LABORATORY MEDICINE; PROTHROMBIN TIME; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1093/labmed/lmad108
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Rejected samples lead to prolonged turnaround time and delayed diagnosis and treatment of patients. This study was conducted to determine minimum acceptable sample volume in Sarstedt brand coagulation tubes to reduce high sample rejection rate.Methods Blood samples were drawn from 20 participants (10 healthy volunteers and 10 patients receiving oral anticoagulant) into coagulation tubes. Six samples were taken from each participant, with tube fill volumes of 100%, 90%, 80%, 70%, 60%, and 50%. Prothrombin time (PT), active partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and fibrinogen tests were analyzed.Results According to quality performance specifications, the tube fill volume must be at least 70% for PT and aPTT and 50% for fibrinogen. There was no statistical difference in samples from healthy volunteers for PT, aPTT, and fibrinogen tests when the minimum tube fill volume was at least 80%, 90%, and 50%, respectively. These percentages were 50%, 70%, and 60%, respectively, in patients receiving oral anticoagulant.Conclusions Sarstedt tubes meet quality standard specifications at a 70% fill rate for PT and aPTT and a 50% fill rate for fibrinogen. Comprehensive studies with larger populations are needed to accept these values as sample acceptance criteria for the laboratory.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 446
页数:5
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据