Machine learning does not outperform traditional statistical modelling for kidney allograft failure prediction

被引:16
作者
Truchot, Agathe [1 ]
Raynaud, Marc [1 ]
Kamar, Nassim [2 ]
Naesens, Maarten [3 ]
Legendre, Christophe [1 ,4 ]
Delahousse, Michel [5 ]
Thaunat, Olivier [6 ]
Buchler, Matthias [7 ]
Crespo, Marta [8 ]
Linhares, Kamilla [9 ]
Orandi, Babak J. [10 ]
Akalin, Enver [11 ]
Pujol, Gervacio Soler [12 ]
Silva, Helio Tedesco
Gupta, Gaurav [13 ]
Segev, Dorry L. [14 ]
Jouven, Xavier [1 ,15 ]
Bentall, Andrew J. [16 ]
Stegall, Mark D. [16 ]
Lefaucheur, Carmen [1 ,17 ]
Aubert, Olivier [1 ,4 ]
Loupy, Alexandre [1 ,4 ,18 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris, Paris Translat Res Ctr Organ Transplantat, INSERM, PARCC, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paul Sabatier, Dept Nephrol & Organ Transplantat, CHU, INSERM,Rangueil & Purpan, Toulouse, France
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Microbiol Immunol & Transplantat, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Hop Necker Enfants Malad, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Kidney Transplant Dept, Paris, France
[5] Foch Hosp, Dept Transplantat Nephrol & Clin Immunol, Suresnes, France
[6] Hosp Civils Lyon, Dept Transplantat Nephrol & Clin Immunol, Lyon, France
[7] Bretonneau Hosp, Nephrol & Immunol Dept, Tours, France
[8] Hosp Mar Barcelona, Dept Nephrol, Barcelona, Spain
[9] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Hosp Rim, Escola Paulista Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[10] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Heersink Sch Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[11] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Kidney Transplantat Program, Renal Div, New York, NY USA
[12] Ctr Educ Med & Invest Clin Buenos Aires, Unidad Trasplante Renopancreas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[13] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Internal Med, Div Nephrol, Sch Med, Richmond, VA USA
[14] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[15] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, Cardiol Dept, Paris, France
[16] Mayo Clin, William J von Liebig Ctr Transplantat & Clin Regen, Rochester, MN USA
[17] St Louis Hosp, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Kidney Transplant Dept, Paris, France
[18] Hop Necker Enfants Malad, Serv Transplantat Renale, 149 rue Sevres, F-75015 Paris, France
关键词
artificial intelligence; prediction; transplantation; TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; GRAFT-SURVIVAL; RISK; PERFORMANCE; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.kint.2022.12.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Machine learning (ML) models have recently shown potential for predicting kidney allograft outcomes. However, their ability to outperform traditional approaches remains poorly investigated. Therefore, using large cohorts of kidney transplant recipients from 14 centers worldwide, we developed ML-based prediction models for kidney allograft survival and compared their prediction performances to those achieved by a validated Cox-Based Prognostication System (CBPS). In a French derivation cohort of 4000 patients, candidate determinants of allograft failure including donor, recipient and transplant-related parameters were used as predictors to develop tree-based models (RSF, RSF-ERT, CIF), Support Vector Machine models (LK-SVM, AK-SVM) and a gradient boosting model (XGBoost). Models were externally validated with cohorts of 2214 patients from Europe, 1537 from North America, and 671 from South America. Among these 8422 kidney transplant recipients, 1081 (12.84%) lost their grafts after a median post-transplant follow-up time of 6.25 years (Inter Quartile Range 4.33-8.73). At seven years post-risk evaluation, the ML models achieved a C-index of 0.788 (95% bootstrap percentile confidence interval 0.736-0.833), 0.779 (0.724-0.825), 0.786 (0.735-0.832), 0.527 (0.456-0.602), 0.704 (0.648-0.759) and 0.767 (0.711-0.815) for RSF, RSF-ERT, CIF, LK-SVM, AK-SVM and XGBoost respectively, compared with 0.808 (0.792-0.829) for the CBPS. In validation cohorts, ML models' discrimination performances were in a similar range of those of the CBPS. Calibrations of the ML models were similar or less accurate than those of the CBPS. Thus, when using a transparent methodological pipeline in validated international cohorts, ML models, despite overall good performances, do not outperform a traditional CBPS in predicting kidney allograft failure. Hence, our current study supports the continued use of traditional statistical approaches for kidney graft prognostication.
引用
收藏
页码:936 / 948
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   The impact of deceased donor maintenance on delayed kidney allograft function: A machine learning analysis [J].
Costa, Silvana Daher ;
Modelli de Andrade, Luis Gustavo ;
Carvalho Barroso, Francisco Victor ;
Costa de Oliveira, Claudia Maria ;
de Francesco Daher, Elizabeth ;
Branco Camurca Fernandes, Paula Frassinetti Castelo ;
Esmeraldo, Ronaldo de Matos ;
de Sandes-Freitas, Taina Veras .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (02)
[22]   Comparison of artificial intelligence and human-based prediction and stratification of the risk of long-term kidney allograft failure [J].
Divard, Gillian ;
Raynaud, Marc ;
Tatapudi, Vasishta S. ;
Abdalla, Basmah ;
Bailly, Elodie ;
Assayag, Maureen ;
Binois, Yannick ;
Cohen, Raphael ;
Zhang, Huanxi ;
Ulloa, Camillo ;
Linhares, Kamila ;
Tedesco, Helio S. ;
Legendre, Christophe ;
Jouven, Xavier ;
Montgomery, Robert A. ;
Lefaucheur, Carmen ;
Aubert, Olivier ;
Loupy, Alexandre .
COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE, 2022, 2 (01)
[23]   Prediction of very early subclinical rejection with machine learning in kidney transplantation [J].
Jo, Sung Jun ;
Park, Jae Berm ;
Lee, Kyo Won .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
[24]   The Development of a Machine Learning Inpatient Acute Kidney Injury Prediction Model [J].
Koyner, Jay L. ;
Carey, Kyle A. ;
Edelson, Dana P. ;
Churpek, Matthew M. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (07) :1070-1077
[25]   Crop Type Prediction: A Statistical and Machine Learning Approach [J].
Bhuyan, Bikram Pratim ;
Tomar, Ravi ;
Singh, T. P. ;
Cherif, Amar Ramdane .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
[26]   A Review and Analysis of Machine Learning and Statistical Approaches for Prediction [J].
Nisha, K. G. ;
Sreekumar, K. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INVENTIVE COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (ICICCT), 2017, :135-139
[27]   Improving cardiovascular risk prediction through machine learning modelling of irregularly repeated electronic health records [J].
Li, Chaiquan ;
Liu, Xiaofei ;
Shen, Peng ;
Sun, Yexiang ;
Zhou, Tianjing ;
Chen, Weiye ;
Chen, Qi ;
Lin, Hongbo ;
Tang, Xun ;
Gao, Pei .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL - DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 5 (01) :30-40
[28]   Prediction Model Using Machine Learning for Mortality in Patients with Heart Failure [J].
Negassa, Abdissa ;
Ahmed, Selim ;
Zolty, Ronald ;
Patel, Snehal R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 153 :86-93
[29]   Comparison of statistical and machine learning approaches in land subsidence modelling [J].
Rafiei Sardooi, Elham ;
Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza ;
Azareh, Ali ;
Soleimani Sardoo, Farshad ;
Clague, John J. .
GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (21) :6165-6185
[30]   Forecasting for Network Management with Joint Statistical Modelling and Machine Learning [J].
Lo Schiavo, Leonardo ;
Fiore, Marco ;
Gramaglia, Marco ;
Banchs, Albert ;
Costa-Perez, Xavier .
2022 IEEE 23RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON A WORLD OF WIRELESS, MOBILE AND MULTIMEDIA NETWORKS (WOWMOM 2022), 2022, :60-69