Machine learning does not outperform traditional statistical modelling for kidney allograft failure prediction

被引:11
|
作者
Truchot, Agathe [1 ]
Raynaud, Marc [1 ]
Kamar, Nassim [2 ]
Naesens, Maarten [3 ]
Legendre, Christophe [1 ,4 ]
Delahousse, Michel [5 ]
Thaunat, Olivier [6 ]
Buchler, Matthias [7 ]
Crespo, Marta [8 ]
Linhares, Kamilla [9 ]
Orandi, Babak J. [10 ]
Akalin, Enver [11 ]
Pujol, Gervacio Soler [12 ]
Silva, Helio Tedesco
Gupta, Gaurav [13 ]
Segev, Dorry L. [14 ]
Jouven, Xavier [1 ,15 ]
Bentall, Andrew J. [16 ]
Stegall, Mark D. [16 ]
Lefaucheur, Carmen [1 ,17 ]
Aubert, Olivier [1 ,4 ]
Loupy, Alexandre [1 ,4 ,18 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris, Paris Translat Res Ctr Organ Transplantat, INSERM, PARCC, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paul Sabatier, Dept Nephrol & Organ Transplantat, CHU Rangueil & Purpan, INSERM, Toulouse, France
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Microbiol Immunol & Transplantat, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Hop Necker Enfants Malad, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Kidney Transplant Dept, Paris, France
[5] Foch Hosp, Dept Transplantat Nephrol & Clin Immunol, Suresnes, France
[6] Hosp Civils Lyon, Dept Transplantat Nephrol & Clin Immunol, Lyon, France
[7] Bretonneau Hosp, Nephrol & Immunol Dept, Tours, France
[8] Hosp Mar Barcelona, Dept Nephrol, Barcelona, Spain
[9] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Hosp Rim, Escola Paulista Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[10] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Heersink Sch Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[11] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Kidney Transplantat Program, Renal Div, New York, NY USA
[12] Ctr Educ Med & Invest Clin Buenos Aires, Unidad Trasplante Renopancreas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[13] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Internal Med, Div Nephrol, Sch Med, Richmond, VA USA
[14] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[15] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, Cardiol Dept, Paris, France
[16] Mayo Clin, William J von Liebig Ctr Transplantat & Clin Regen, Rochester, MN USA
[17] St Louis Hosp, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Kidney Transplant Dept, Paris, France
[18] Hop Necker Enfants Malad, Serv Transplantat Renale, 149 rue Sevres, F-75015 Paris, France
关键词
artificial intelligence; prediction; transplantation; TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; GRAFT-SURVIVAL; RISK; PERFORMANCE; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.kint.2022.12.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Machine learning (ML) models have recently shown potential for predicting kidney allograft outcomes. However, their ability to outperform traditional approaches remains poorly investigated. Therefore, using large cohorts of kidney transplant recipients from 14 centers worldwide, we developed ML-based prediction models for kidney allograft survival and compared their prediction performances to those achieved by a validated Cox-Based Prognostication System (CBPS). In a French derivation cohort of 4000 patients, candidate determinants of allograft failure including donor, recipient and transplant-related parameters were used as predictors to develop tree-based models (RSF, RSF-ERT, CIF), Support Vector Machine models (LK-SVM, AK-SVM) and a gradient boosting model (XGBoost). Models were externally validated with cohorts of 2214 patients from Europe, 1537 from North America, and 671 from South America. Among these 8422 kidney transplant recipients, 1081 (12.84%) lost their grafts after a median post-transplant follow-up time of 6.25 years (Inter Quartile Range 4.33-8.73). At seven years post-risk evaluation, the ML models achieved a C-index of 0.788 (95% bootstrap percentile confidence interval 0.736-0.833), 0.779 (0.724-0.825), 0.786 (0.735-0.832), 0.527 (0.456-0.602), 0.704 (0.648-0.759) and 0.767 (0.711-0.815) for RSF, RSF-ERT, CIF, LK-SVM, AK-SVM and XGBoost respectively, compared with 0.808 (0.792-0.829) for the CBPS. In validation cohorts, ML models' discrimination performances were in a similar range of those of the CBPS. Calibrations of the ML models were similar or less accurate than those of the CBPS. Thus, when using a transparent methodological pipeline in validated international cohorts, ML models, despite overall good performances, do not outperform a traditional CBPS in predicting kidney allograft failure. Hence, our current study supports the continued use of traditional statistical approaches for kidney graft prognostication.
引用
收藏
页码:936 / 948
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine Learning Does Not Outperform Traditional Statistical Modelling for Kidney Allograft Failure Prediction
    Truchot, A.
    Raynaud, M.
    Kamar, N.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 107 (07) : 1412 - 1412
  • [2] Predicting Long Term Kidney-Allograft Failure: Machine Learning vs Traditional Statistical Models.
    Truchot, A.
    Raynaud, M.
    Lefaucheur, C.
    Aubert, O.
    Loupy, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 22 : 566 - 567
  • [3] Cloud failure prediction based on traditional machine learning and deep learning
    Tengku Nazmi Tengku Asmawi
    Azlan Ismail
    Jun Shen
    Journal of Cloud Computing, 11
  • [4] Cloud failure prediction based on traditional machine learning and deep learning
    Asmawi, Tengku Nazmi Tengku
    Ismail, Azlan
    Shen, Jun
    JOURNAL OF CLOUD COMPUTING-ADVANCES SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 11 (01):
  • [5] Statistical Prediction and Machine Learning
    Govind, Sabeen
    Chen, John Tuhao
    Chen, Lincy Y.
    Lee, Clement
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2025,
  • [6] Statistical Prediction and Machine Learning
    Jogo, Fransiskus Serfian
    TECHNOMETRICS, 2025, 67 (01) : 184 - 185
  • [7] Machine Learning and Risk Assessment: Random Forest Does Not Outperform Logistic Regression in the Prediction of Sexual Recidivism
    Etzler, Sonja
    Schonbrodt, Felix D.
    Pargent, Florian
    Eher, Reinhard
    Rettenberger, Martin
    ASSESSMENT, 2024, 31 (02) : 460 - 481
  • [8] Machine learning for acute kidney injury: Changing the traditional disease prediction mode
    Yu, Xiang
    Ji, Yuwei
    Huang, Mengjie
    Feng, Zhe
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [9] Machine learning or traditional statistical methods for predictive modelling in perioperative medicine: A narrative review
    Mann, Jason
    Lyons, Mathew
    O'Rourke, John
    Davies, Simon
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2025, 102
  • [10] Predictive modeling in patients with heart failure: A comparison of machine learning and traditional statistical approaches
    Desai, Rishi J.
    Wang, Shirley
    Vaduganathan, Muthiah
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 28 : 228 - 228