The changing landscape of action learning research and practice

被引:13
作者
Cho, Yonjoo [1 ]
Egan, Toby [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Tyler, Dept Human Resource Dev, Tyler, TX 75799 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Publ Policy, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Robert H Smith Sch Business, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
Learning in HRD; action learning research; systematic literature review; LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT; WICKED PROBLEMS; ENTREPRENEURIAL; MANAGEMENT; REFLECTIONS; FACILITATOR; CAPABILITY; INNOVATION; EDUCATION; BUSINESS;
D O I
10.1080/13678868.2022.2124584
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Action-oriented approaches to HRD are rooted in practices, theory, and research that preceded its emergence - among these is action learning. An important element of many organisational practices today, action learning has been researched widely and consistently over several decades. The purpose of this study was to elaborate upon the changing landscape of action learning research and practice through a systematic literature review. Employing selection criteria to control for the quality of the articles, we identified 65 empirical action learning studies published 2008-2021. Five key themes were identified to be most prominent in terms of presence and quality: action learning in higher education, action learning research, entrepreneurial action learning, critical action learning, and virtual action learning. In an analysis of the five key themes, we used Coghlan and Coughlan's four quality criteria for research on action learning: engagement with problems, collaboration with organisational members and stakeholders, reflection on the iterative cycles of an action learning process, and actionable outcomes. This systematic review presents the changing landscape of action learning research and practice manifested in five themes and provides an informed outlook, with expanded scopes and possibilities, to envision the future.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 404
页数:27
相关论文
共 86 条
[71]   An Integrative Framework for Problem-Based Learning and Action Learning: Promoting Evidence-Based Design and Evaluation in Leadership Development [J].
Scott, Kimberly S. .
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2017, 16 (01) :3-34
[72]  
Smith S, 2017, ACTION LEARN, V14, P230, DOI 10.1080/14767333.2017.1288081
[73]   The gendered power relations of action learning: a critical analysis of women's reflections on a leadership development programme [J].
Stead, Valerie .
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 17 (04) :416-437
[74]   Action learning and executive education: achieving credible personal, practitioner and organisational learning [J].
Stephens, Simon ;
Margey, Michael .
ACTION LEARNING, 2015, 12 (01) :37-51
[75]   The role of the blended action learning facilitator: an enabler of learning and a trusted inquisitor [J].
Thornton, Kate ;
Yoong, Pak .
ACTION LEARNING, 2011, 8 (02) :129-146
[76]  
Tosey P, 2017, HUM RESOUR DEV INT, V20, P393, DOI 10.1080/13678868.2017.1329368
[77]   The Distinctions Between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework [J].
Varpio, Lara ;
Paradis, Elise ;
Uijtdehaage, Sebastian ;
Young, Meredith .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2020, 95 (07) :989-994
[78]   Finding critical action learning through paradox: The role of action learning in the suppression and stimulation of critical reflection [J].
Vince, Russ ;
Abbey, Graham ;
Langenhan, Melissa ;
Bell, Diane .
MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2018, 49 (01) :86-106
[79]  
Warwick R, 2017, ACTION LEARN, V14, P104, DOI 10.1080/14767333.2017.1296409
[80]  
Willis V.J., 2004, Action Learning: Research and Practice, V1, P11, DOI DOI 10.1080/1476733042000187592