Effects of digital innovation on income inequality among different workforces: evidence from Chinese industries

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Yongguang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Xie, Weihong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Li, Jingwu [6 ]
Li, Qun [7 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Technol, Key Lab Digital Econ & Data Governance, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Mfg Big Data Innovat Res Ctr, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Big Data Strateg Decis Lab Ind Enterprises, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Guangdong Univ Technol, Big Data Strategy Res Ctr, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Business Sch, 39 South Coll Rd, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[7] Beijing HeroopSys Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Income inequality; Gini coefficient; digital innovation; industry-level analysis; G30; G38; WAGES; PROFITS; RENTS; TASKS; PANEL; FIRM; PAY;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2024.2331424
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To understand the impact of digital innovation on the workforce and its role in achieving common prosperity, this paper uses data from Chinese A-share listed companies during 2006-2021 to investigate the effects of digital innovation on income inequality among different industry-level groups. We find that digital innovation significantly reduces income inequality among employees across industries, but it does not significantly impact income inequality within management groups. Through mechanistic analysis, we find that digital innovation decreases income inequality among ordinary employees whose incomes are closely linked to company performance and thereby for the entire workforce by narrowing the income gap across industries. However, as digital innovation does not significantly influence evaluation systems (e.g. educational degrees) for management income, it does not contribute to reducing income inequality among managerial levels. These findings provide valuable insights to develop policies for common prosperity.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Determinants of Income Inequality Among Provinces: Panel Data Evidence from Indonesia
    Walujadi, Dedi
    Indupurnahayu, Indupumahayu
    Endri, Endri
    QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2022, 23 (190): : 243 - 250
  • [32] Does Environmental Regulation Matter for Income Inequality? New Evidence from Chinese Communities
    Huang, Bihong
    Yao, Ying
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2023, 10 (05) : 1309 - 1334
  • [33] International Trade, Factor Endowments, and Income Inequality: Evidence from Chinese Regional Data
    Xiong, Yanyan
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2020, 56 (14) : 3405 - 3424
  • [34] Digital transformation and income inequality within enterprises - Evidence from listed companies in China
    Li, Minghuan
    Jiang, Anxuan
    Ma, Jianteng
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 81
  • [35] Does digital infrastructure exacerbate income inequality? Evidence from the Broadband China Strategy
    Liang, Dong
    Liu, Yu
    Zhou, Meifang
    Zhao, Luben
    Li, Xinbei
    STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2025, 72 : 360 - 373
  • [36] Income inequality convergence: Evidence from the World Inequality Database
    Kim, Kyungmin
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2022, 42 (04): : 1858 - 1873
  • [37] The Chinese economy and income inequality among East Asian countries
    Sato, Sumie
    Fukushige, Mototsugu
    CHINA ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2012, 5 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [38] Trade Openness and Income Inequality: Fresh Evidence Based on Different Inequality Measures
    Khoso, Noor Ahmed
    Rajput, Sheraz
    Tariq, Aziz
    Hussain, Akseer
    Jahanzeb, Agha
    APPLIED ECONOMICS JOURNAL, 2021, 28 (02): : 63 - 81
  • [39] Capital income and income inequality: Evidence from urban China
    Chi, Wei
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2012, 40 (02) : 228 - 239
  • [40] Unions and income inequality: evidence from Ireland
    Herzer, Dierk
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2014, 21 (01) : 24 - 27