Assessing streamflow and sediment responses to future climate change over the Upper Mekong River Basin: A comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP6 models

被引:6
作者
Ma, Di [1 ]
Bai, Zhixu [2 ]
Xu, Yue-Ping [3 ]
Gu, Haiting [3 ]
Gao, Chao [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] NingboTech Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Ningbo 315100, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Univ, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Wenzhou 325035, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Water Sci & Engn, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Adv Inst Nat Sci, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Normal Univ, Zhuhai Campus,C708 Room,Muduo Bldg,18 Jinfeng Rd, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Climate change; CMIP5-CMIP6; comparison; Streamflow; Sediments; Future projection; TEMPORAL VARIABILITY; WEATHER GENERATOR; TIBETAN PLATEAU; CHANGE IMPACTS; LANCANG RIVER; WATER-QUALITY; 3S RIVERS; UNCERTAINTY; PRECIPITATION; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101685
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Study region: The Upper Mekong River Basin (UMRB), Southwest China. Study focus: With climate change unfolding and climate change knowledge evolving over time, it is imperative to investigate whether the latest CMIP6 models offer enhanced utility in climate change impact studies compared to their predecessors. This study strengthens the comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in assessing hydrological responses to future climate change. This was achieved utilizing the Soil and Water Assessment Tool, driven by downscaled CMIP5/ CMIP6 model outputs under RCP8.5/SSP5-8.5. Both streamflow and sediment responses, encompassing the spatial and temporal changes, and the relationships between streamflow and sediment loads, were carefully evaluated and compared between CMIP5 and CMIP6. New hydrological insights for the region: CMIP6 indicates a stronger warming in 2071-2100 over the UMRB compared to CMIP5. Mean annual precipitation/streamflow is projected to increase by 22.7%/26.3% using CMIP5 and 28.4%/34.4% using CMIP6. Mean annual sediment load changes, however, show a discrepancy between CMIP5 (-3.7%) and CMIP6 (+13.8%). CMIP6 exhibits larger inter-model variability in both climate and hydrological projections. Regarding future spatial distributions of mean annual water and sediment yields, a considerable agreement is demonstrated between CMIP5 and CMIP6, despite CMIP6 showing larger projections over most subbasins. Additionally, both ensembles exhibit approximate relationships between streamflow and sediment loads, indicating a comparable decline in watershed sediment generation and transport capacity under future climate change. Overall, CMIP6 suggests more severe climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment loads in the UMRB than CMIP5, highlighting the need to update climate change adaptation and mitigation policies based on the latest insights derived from CMIP6.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT
    Abbaspour, Karim C.
    Yang, Jing
    Maximov, Ivan
    Siber, Rosi
    Bogner, Konrad
    Mieleitner, Johanna
    Zobrist, Juerg
    Srinivasan, Raghavan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 333 (2-4) : 413 - 430
  • [2] Abbaspour KC, 2004, VADOSE ZONE J, V3, P1340
  • [3] Robust changes and sources of uncertainty in the projected hydrological regimes of Swiss catchments
    Addor, Nans
    Roessler, Ole
    Koeplin, Nina
    Huss, Matthias
    Weingartner, Rolf
    Seibert, Jan
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2014, 50 (10) : 7541 - 7562
  • [4] Projected Changes in Temperature and Precipitation Over the United States, Central America, and the Caribbean in CMIP6 GCMs
    Almazroui, Mansour
    Islam, M. Nazrul
    Saeed, Fahad
    Saeed, Sajjad
    Ismail, Muhammad
    Ehsan, Muhammad Azhar
    Diallo, Ismaila
    O'Brien, Enda
    Ashfaq, Moetasim
    Martinez-Castro, Daniel
    Cavazos, Tereza
    Cerezo-Mota, Ruth
    Tippett, Michael K.
    Gutowski, William J.
    Alfaro, Eric J.
    Hidalgo, Hugo G.
    Vichot-Llano, Alejandro
    Campbell, Jayaka D.
    Kamil, Shahzad
    Rashid, Irfan Ur
    Sylla, Mouhamadou Bamba
    Stephenson, Tannecia
    Taylor, Michael
    Barlow, Mathew
    [J]. EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 5 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [5] The CMIP6 landscape
    不详
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2019, 9 (10) : 727 - 727
  • [6] CONTINUOUS-TIME WATER AND SEDIMENT ROUTING MODEL FOR LARGE BASINS
    ARNOLD, JG
    WILLIAMS, JR
    MAIDMENT, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1995, 121 (02): : 171 - 183
  • [7] Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves
    Asselman, NEM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 234 (3-4) : 228 - 248
  • [8] Climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment yield in the North of Iran
    Azari, Mahmood
    Moradi, Hamid Reza
    Saghafian, Bahram
    Faramarzi, Monireh
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, 2016, 61 (01) : 123 - 133
  • [9] Intercomparison of the expected change in the temperature and the precipitation retrieved from CMIP6 and CMIP5 climate projections: A Mediterranean hot spot case, Turkey
    Bagcaci, S. Cagatay
    Yucel, Ismail
    Duzenli, Eren
    Yilmaz, M. Tugrul
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2021, 256
  • [10] Projecting Hydrological Responses to Climate Change Using CMIP6 Climate Scenarios for the Upper Huai River Basin, China
    Bian, Guodong
    Zhang, Jianyun
    Chen, Jie
    Song, Mingming
    He, Ruimin
    Liu, Cuishan
    Liu, Yanli
    Bao, Zhenxin
    Lin, Qianguo
    Wang, Guoqing
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9