Proof of Optimum (PoO): Consensus Model Based on Fairness and Efficiency in Blockchain

被引:2
|
作者
Gunduz, Fatih [1 ]
Birogul, Serdar [2 ]
Kose, Utku [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Turkiye, TR-32260 Isparta, Turkiye
[2] Duzce Univ, Dept Comp Engn, TR-81620 Duzce, Turkiye
[3] Univ North Dakota, Coll Engn & Mines, Grand Forks, ND 58202 USA
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 18期
关键词
blockchain; optimization; genetic algorithm; traveling salesman problem; consensus algorithm;
D O I
10.3390/app131810149
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Blockchain systems are popular technologies that have recently emerged. As a decentralized system, blockchain technology has provided many solutions and many problems associated with these solutions. One of its most important problems is that while performing hash calculations very intensively to create a new consensus block, it reduces its efficiency depending on the duration. In this study, a new model to avoid Proof of Work (PoW), which directs the computations made to create blocks to optimization algorithms, is proposed. The proof mechanism proposed in this study is called Proof of Optimization (PoO). A traveling salesman problem (TSP) is entered into the designed system to solve the optimization algorithms. Nodes are asked to solve the TSP in certain iterations and populations. As a result, nodes are asked to create blocks with the fitness, density and time values obtained. PoO and PoW consensus algorithms were subjected to an experimental comparison in the system. The test results show that the block generation time of the PoO consensus model varies between 2 s according to the dataset solution with the least cities (ulysses22) and 60 s according to the dataset solution with the most cities (gr666). Additionally, as a result of experimental analyses, it was determined that decentralization, which is the percentage of block creation among miners in the blockchain, reached a more stable value and the fairness index rose above 0.90 on average. When the obtained values were compared with PoW, it was observed that the block time was more stable and the decentralization of the blockchain was higher. In this way, high-equipped nodes in the blockchain system are prevented from dominating the network. Thus, it is ensured that low-equipped nodes have the right to create blocks in the blockchain. The difficulty levels of the problems can be adjusted by changing the number of cities in the TSP evaluated in this study. In this way, the problem of creating blocks in the network can be made more difficult or easier at any time.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A novel game theory based reliable proof-of-stake consensus mechanism for blockchain
    Bala, Kirti
    Kaur, Pankaj Deep
    TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 33 (09)
  • [32] Proof of Run: A Fair and Sustainable Blockchain Consensus Protocol Based on Game Theory in DApps
    Yang, Meiqi
    Tao, Yu
    Wu, Xiaofei
    Ge, Chunpeng
    Zhou, Lu
    WEB AND BIG DATA, APWEB-WAIM 2024, PT IV, 2024, 14964 : 309 - 325
  • [33] Mechanism for proof-of-reputation consensus for blockchain validator nodes
    Liu N.
    Chen Z.
    Liu G.
    Li Y.
    Xi'an Dianzi Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Xidian University, 2020, 47 (05): : 57 - 62
  • [34] PROOF-OF-STAKE CONSENSUS METHOD FOR UPCOMING BLOCKCHAIN NETWORKS
    Krishnan, Sridharan
    Koperundevi, ArjunVikram Thiruvengavaradan
    Jayasundarapandiyan, Bharathiraja
    Sampath, Jeevanraj
    SURANAREE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 30 (04):
  • [35] A Survey on Consensus Algorithms of Blockchain Based on DAG
    Lu, Xiaofeng
    Jiang, Cheng
    Wang, Pan
    2024 6TH BLOCKCHAIN AND INTERNET OF THINGS CONFERENCE, BIOTC 2024, 2024, : 50 - 58
  • [36] Delegated Proof of Stake With Downgrade: A Secure and Efficient Blockchain Consensus Algorithm With Downgrade Mechanism
    Yang, Fan
    Zhou, Wei
    Wu, Qingqing
    Long, Rui
    Xiong, Neal N.
    Zhou, Meiqi
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 118541 - 118555
  • [37] Proof-of-Monitoring (PoM): A Novel Consensus Mechanism for Blockchain-Based Secure Service Level Agreement Management
    Weerasinghe, Nisita
    Mishra, Raaj
    Porambage, Pawani
    Liyanage, Madhusanka
    Ylianttila, Mika
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 20 (03): : 2783 - 2803
  • [38] Raft Consensus Algorithm Based on Credit Model in Consortium Blockchain
    CHEN Yunfang
    LIU Ping
    ZHANG Wei
    Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2020, 25 (02) : 146 - 154
  • [39] The cellular goore game-based consensus protocol: a cognitive model for blockchain consensus
    Ameri, Reyhaneh
    Meybodi, Mohammad Reza
    CLUSTER COMPUTING-THE JOURNAL OF NETWORKS SOFTWARE TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 27 (03): : 2715 - 2740
  • [40] Trustworthy VANhT: Hierarchical DAG-Based Blockchain Solution with Proof of Reputation Consensus Algorithm
    Dong, Zhongxu
    Wu, Huanyu
    Li, Zongyao
    Mi, De
    Popoola, Olaoluwa
    Zhang, Lei
    2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BLOCKCHAIN, BLOCKCHAIN, 2023, : 127 - 132