An Umbrella Review and Meta-analysis of Interventions, Excluding Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition, Initiated in the Hospital for Adults with or at Risk of Malnutrition

被引:8
作者
Wong, Alvin [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Yingxiao [1 ]
Sowa, Przemyslaw M. [3 ]
Banks, Merrilyn D. [4 ]
Bauer, Judith D. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Dietet, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Human Movement & Nutr Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Ctr Business & Econ Hlth, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[4] Royal Brisbane & Women s Hosp, Dept Nutr & Dietet, Herston, Qld, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Dept Nutr Dietet & Food, Notting Hill, Vic, Australia
关键词
malnutrition; nutritional intervention; hospitalization; umbrella review; meta-analysis; trial sequential analysis; HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; OLDER-ADULTS; QUALITY; SUPPLEMENTS; MEALTIMES; SUPPORT; TREAT; GUIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.07.003
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) on various nutritional interventions in hospitalized patients with or at risk of malnutrition are available, but disagreements among findings raise questions about their validity in guiding practice. Objectives: We conducted an umbrella review (a systematic review of systematic reviews in which all appropriate studies included in SRMAs are combined) to assess the quality of reviews, identify the types of interventions available (excluding enteral and parenteral nutrition), and re-analyze the effectiveness of interventions. Methods: The databases MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. AMSTAR-2 was used for quality assessment and GRADE for certainty of evidence. Updated meta-analyses with risk of bias (ROB) by Cochrane ROB 2.0 were performed. Pooled effects were reported as relative risk (RR), with zero-events and publication bias adjustments, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) performed for mortality, readmissions, complications, length of stay, and quality of life. Results: A total of 66 randomized controlled trials were cited by the 19 SRMAs included in this umbrella review, and their data extracted and analyzed. Most clinical outcomes were discordant with variable effect sizes in both directions. In trials with low ROB, interventions targeting nutritional intake reduce mortality at 30 d (15 studies, n: 4156, RR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55, 0.94, P: 0.02, I2: 6%, Certainty: High), 6 mo (27 studies, n: 6387, RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.92, P 1/4 0.001, I2: 4%, Certainty: Moderate), and 12 mo (27 studies, n: 6387, RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.95, P: 0.01, I2: 33%, Certainty: Moderate), with TSA verifying an adequate sample size and robustness of the meta-analysis. Conclusion: Existing evidence is sufficient to show that nutritional intervention is effective for mortality outcomes at 30 d, 6 mo, and 12 mo. Future clinical trials should focus on the effect of nutritional interventions on other clinical outcomes. Trial registration nutuber: The protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022341031).
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 696
页数:25
相关论文
共 52 条
[31]   The effectiveness of trained volunteer delivered interventions in adults at risk of malnutrition: A systematic review and meta-analysis * [J].
Latif, Jawairia ;
Dabbous, Massar ;
Weekes, C. Elizabeth ;
Baldwin, Christine .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2021, 40 (03) :710-727
[32]   Can fortified foods and snacks increase the energy and protein intake of hospitalised older patients? A systematic review [J].
Mills, S. R. ;
Wilcox, C. R. ;
Ibrahim, K. ;
Roberts, H. C. .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2018, 31 (03) :379-389
[33]  
Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n71, 10.1136/bmj.n160]
[34]   Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview [J].
Pieper, Dawid ;
Antoine, Sunya-Lee ;
Mathes, Tim ;
Neugebauer, Edmund A. M. ;
Eikermann, Michaela .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (04) :368-375
[35]   Protected Mealtimes in hospitals and nutritional intake: Systematic review and meta-analyses [J].
Porter, Judi ;
Ottrey, Ella ;
Huggins, Catherine E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2017, 65 :62-69
[36]   Effectiveness of multidisciplinary nutritional support in older hospitalised patients: A systematic review and meta-analyses [J].
Rasmussen, Nanna M. L. ;
Belqaid, Kerstin ;
Lugnet, Kerstin ;
Nielsen, Anni Linnet ;
Rasmussen, Henrik Hojgaard ;
Beck, Anne Marie .
CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN, 2018, 27 :44-52
[37]   Nutrition interventions implemented in hospital to lower risk of sarcopenia in older adults: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials [J].
Rus, Grace E. ;
Porter, Judi ;
Brunton, Alexandra ;
Crocker, Meghan ;
Kotsimbos, Zoe ;
Percic, Jessica ;
Polzella, Louise ;
Willet, Natasha ;
Huggins, Catherine E. .
NUTRITION & DIETETICS, 2020, 77 (01) :90-102
[38]   Dietitian assistant opportunities within the nutrition care process for patients with or at risk of malnutrition: a systematic review [J].
Rushton, Alita ;
Edwards, Anna ;
Bauer, Judith ;
Bell, Jack J. .
NUTRITION & DIETETICS, 2021, 78 (01) :69-85
[39]   Understanding Nutritional Epidemiology and Its Role in Policy [J].
Satija, Ambika ;
Yu, Edward ;
Willett, Walter C. ;
Hu, Frank B. .
ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2015, 6 (01) :5-18
[40]   AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both [J].
Shea, Beverley J. ;
Reeves, Barnaby C. ;
Wells, George ;
Thuku, Micere ;
Hamel, Candyce ;
Moran, Julian ;
Moher, David ;
Tugwell, Peter ;
Welch, Vivian ;
Kristjansson, Elizabeth ;
Henry, David A. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 358