Business Actors' Interest in Harder and Softer Regulation of Human Rights Due Diligence

被引:1
作者
Lennartz, Benedikt [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Westfal Wilhelms Univ Munster, Inst furPolitikwissensch, Chair IR & Sustainable Dev, Munster, Germany
[2] Westfal Wilhelms Univ Munster, Inst Politikwissensch, Chair IR & Sustainable Dev, Scharnhorststr 100, D-48151 Munster, Germany
关键词
hard law; soft law; business interests; human rights; LAW; GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY; MANAGEMENT; STATE; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/18918131.2023.2250629
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Scholars of global governance have long attended to the role of non-state actors in formulating and interpreting regulatory instruments, analysing these actors' engagement with processes, their influence, and their preferences in terms of the content and, to a limited degree, form of regulation. Among the non-state actors involved in governance settings, business actors are an interesting subject given the resources at their disposal to exert material, structural, and ideational power and due to the global nature of large corporations. They are especially relevant in human rights regulation, as the global nature of business activity through supply chains, subsidiaries, and finance is contrasted with a state-centred human rights regime. Several regulatory instruments have been passed in this space, both nationally and internationally, and regulatory initiatives are increasingly common. This article focuses on business actors' potential interest in the form of regulation, how different forms of regulation may affect different business actors, and how the interest of business actors can be traced back to notions of public and private.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 344
页数:19
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
8International Organisation of Employers (IOE) International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD (BIAC), 2008, JOINT IN VIEWS INT O
[2]   The concept of legalization [J].
Abbott, KW ;
Keohane, RO ;
Moravcsik, A ;
Slaughter, AM ;
Snidal, D .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2000, 54 (03) :401-+
[3]  
Andresen Maggie, 2011, GUARDIAN 0929
[4]  
Anner M., 2013, Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal, V35, P1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, BUNDESGESETZBLATT 1, P2961
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2022, BBC News23 March
[8]  
Auswartiges Amt, 2015, DOK NAT AKT WIRTSCH
[9]  
Auswartiges Amt, 2017, NAT AKT UMS VN LEITP
[10]  
Auswartiges Amt, 2015, K NAT AKT WIRTSCH ME, P5