Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions

被引:189
作者
Ahmad, Rehan [1 ]
Nawaz, Muhammad Rafay [2 ]
Ishaq, Muhammad Ishtiaq [3 ]
Khan, Mumtaz Muhammad [1 ]
Ashraf, Hafiz Ahmad [4 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll Business Studies, Lahore, Pakistan
[2] Univ Punjab, Banking & Finance, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
[3] Quaid I Azam Univ, Islamabad, Pakistan
[4] Univ Cent Punjab, Management Sci, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
关键词
social exchange theory; reciprocity; workplace relations; evolution of social behaviors; social exchange behavior; PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; IDEOLOGY; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; RECIPROCITY; COMMITMENT; OUTCOMES; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Social exchange theory (SET) is one of the most influential theories in social sciences, which has implications across various fields. Despite its usefulness being a typical social transaction, there is a need to look at it from the lens of psychological transactions to further its evolution and to identify future directions. After generally reviewing 3,649 articles from the Social Science Citation Index and Scopus, a total of 46 articles were selected for final review using a comprehensive systematic review approach. We have highlighted the need for further research in psychological transactions, reciprocity principles, exchange relations, and the impact of various factors on the exchange process. Among other exchange rules (social, economic, and psychological) and transactions (social, economic, and psychological), this research provides an elevation platform for the less explored exchange rules in psychological transactions. Among other theories in the social sciences, social exchange theory is a theory that shadows many other theories under its umbrella.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Ahmad R., 2020, PAK SOC SCI REV, V4, P96, DOI [10.35484/pssr.2020(4-iv)07, DOI 10.35484/PSSR.2020(4-IV)07]
[2]  
ANDERSON B, 1969, ACTA SOCIOL, V12, P1
[3]   Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace [J].
Andersson, LM ;
Pearson, CM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (03) :452-471
[4]   The interactive effects of organizational politics and exchange ideology on manager ratings of retention [J].
Andrews, MC ;
Witt, LC ;
Kacmar, KM .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2003, 62 (02) :357-369
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, ADV SOCIAL PSYCHOL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Human Relations
[7]   EXCHANGE AND POWER IN SOCIAL-LIFE - BLAU,PM [J].
BIERSTEDT, R .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1965, 30 (05) :789-790
[8]   Support, commitment, and employee outcomes in a team environment [J].
Bishop, JW ;
Scott, KD ;
Burroughs, SM .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (06) :1113-1132
[9]  
CHEN CC, 1995, ACAD MANAGE J, V38, P408, DOI 10.5465/256686
[10]   The New Era Workplace Relationships: Is Social Exchange Theory Still Relevant? [J].
Chernyak-Hai, Lily ;
Rabenu, Edna .
INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2018, 11 (03) :456-481