Corporate sustainability and performance: An efficiency perspective

被引:8
作者
Erbetta, Fabrizio [1 ]
Bruno, Clementina [1 ]
Pirovano, Carolina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dept Econ & Business, Via Perrone 18, I-28100 Novara, Italy
关键词
allocative efficiency; energy sector; renewables; trade-off paradigm; win-win paradigm; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; TRADE-OFFS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; DECISION-MAKING; RENEWABLES; SYSTEM; GREEN;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3262
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The growing attention to corporate sustainability has favoured the emergence of paradigms aimed at understanding the interaction between the economic and the environmental sustainability dimensions. While a win-win paradigm initially arose basically aimed at emphasizing the potential synergies between these two objectives, an alternative vision based on a logic of trade-off has subsequently emerged, foreseeing that improvement in one perspective can often be harmful to the other. Focusing on the EU energy production industry, this study adopts a data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach with the aim to assess whether mutual impact there exists between the economic and the environmental sides reflecting a win-win or a trade-off relationship. Furthermore, as prioritizing sustainability indicators has been recognized in the ongoing debate as a useful way to build effective sustainability practices, our assessment of the mutual impact accommodates the possibility that the resulting evidence may change when priority is placed, alternatively, to the economic or the environmental sustainability concern. The results show how the environmental goal enters in a trade-off relationship with the economic one when priority is placed on the environmental dimension. This casts doubts on the feasibility of a spontaneous path towards the strengthening of renewable sources.
引用
收藏
页码:2649 / 2661
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business [J].
Jeurissen, R .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2000, 23 (02) :229-231
[22]   Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance in the Financial Services Sector [J].
Jo, Hoje ;
Kim, Hakkon ;
Park, Kwangwoo .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2015, 131 (02) :257-284
[23]   Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies? [J].
Kroll, Christian ;
Warchold, Anne ;
Pradhan, Prajal .
PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 5 (1)
[24]  
McDonough William., 2002, CORPORATE ENV STRATE, V9, P251, DOI [10.1016/S1066-7938(02)00069-6, DOI 10.1016/S1066-7938(02)00069-6, 10.1016/S1066- 7938(02)00069-6]
[25]   Strategic Decision Making for the Triple Bottom Line [J].
McWilliams, Abagail ;
Parhankangas, Annaleena ;
Coupet, Jason ;
Welch, Eric ;
Barnum, Darold T. .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 25 (03) :193-204
[26]  
Os?n J., 2009, RS 1D ASSESSMENT EXT
[27]   Impacts of Intermittent Renewables on Electricity Generation System Operation [J].
Perez-Arriaga, Ignacio J. ;
Batlle, Carlos .
ECONOMICS OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2012, 1 (02) :3-17
[28]  
PORTER ME, 1995, HARVARD BUS REV, V73, P120
[29]   Managing Tensions in Corporate Sustainability Through a Practical Wisdom Lens [J].
Sasse-Werhahn, Laura F. ;
Bachmann, Claudius ;
Habisch, Andre .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 163 (01) :53-66
[30]   Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach [J].
Tone, Kaoru ;
Tsutsui, Miki .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2010, 38 (3-4) :145-156