Corporate sustainability and performance: An efficiency perspective

被引:8
作者
Erbetta, Fabrizio [1 ]
Bruno, Clementina [1 ]
Pirovano, Carolina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dept Econ & Business, Via Perrone 18, I-28100 Novara, Italy
关键词
allocative efficiency; energy sector; renewables; trade-off paradigm; win-win paradigm; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; TRADE-OFFS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; DECISION-MAKING; RENEWABLES; SYSTEM; GREEN;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3262
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The growing attention to corporate sustainability has favoured the emergence of paradigms aimed at understanding the interaction between the economic and the environmental sustainability dimensions. While a win-win paradigm initially arose basically aimed at emphasizing the potential synergies between these two objectives, an alternative vision based on a logic of trade-off has subsequently emerged, foreseeing that improvement in one perspective can often be harmful to the other. Focusing on the EU energy production industry, this study adopts a data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach with the aim to assess whether mutual impact there exists between the economic and the environmental sides reflecting a win-win or a trade-off relationship. Furthermore, as prioritizing sustainability indicators has been recognized in the ongoing debate as a useful way to build effective sustainability practices, our assessment of the mutual impact accommodates the possibility that the resulting evidence may change when priority is placed, alternatively, to the economic or the environmental sustainability concern. The results show how the environmental goal enters in a trade-off relationship with the economic one when priority is placed on the environmental dimension. This casts doubts on the feasibility of a spontaneous path towards the strengthening of renewable sources.
引用
收藏
页码:2649 / 2661
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: the Trade-Offs of Sustainability Ratings [J].
Delmas, Magali ;
Blass, Vered Doctori .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 19 (04) :245-260
[12]  
Dyllick T., 2002, Business Strategy and the Environment, V11, P130, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.323
[13]  
FARE R, 1989, REV ECON STAT, V71, P90
[14]   Is green and profitable sustainable? Assessing the trade-off between economic and environmental aspects [J].
Figge, Frank ;
Hahn, Tobias .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 140 (01) :92-102
[15]   The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities [J].
Filbeck, G ;
Gorman, RF .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2004, 29 (02) :137-157
[16]   SHIFTING PARADIGMS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT THEORY AND RESEARCH [J].
GLADWIN, TN ;
KENNELLY, JJ ;
KRAUSE, TS .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (04) :874-907
[17]   A system of systems approach to energy sustainability assessment: Are all renewables really green? [J].
Hadian, Saeed ;
Madani, Kaveh .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 52 :194-206
[18]   Classification of Trade-offs Encountered in the Practice of Corporate Sustainability [J].
Haffar, Merriam ;
Searcy, Cory .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2017, 140 (03) :495-522
[19]   Trade-Offs in Corporate Sustainability: You Can't Have Your Cake and Eat It [J].
Hahn, Tobias ;
Figge, Frank ;
Pinkse, Jonatan ;
Preuss, Lutz .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 19 (04) :217-229
[20]   A Cognitive Perspective on the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability [J].
Hockerts, Kai .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 24 (02) :102-122