Corporate sustainability and performance: An efficiency perspective

被引:8
作者
Erbetta, Fabrizio [1 ]
Bruno, Clementina [1 ]
Pirovano, Carolina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dept Econ & Business, Via Perrone 18, I-28100 Novara, Italy
关键词
allocative efficiency; energy sector; renewables; trade-off paradigm; win-win paradigm; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; TRADE-OFFS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; DECISION-MAKING; RENEWABLES; SYSTEM; GREEN;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3262
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The growing attention to corporate sustainability has favoured the emergence of paradigms aimed at understanding the interaction between the economic and the environmental sustainability dimensions. While a win-win paradigm initially arose basically aimed at emphasizing the potential synergies between these two objectives, an alternative vision based on a logic of trade-off has subsequently emerged, foreseeing that improvement in one perspective can often be harmful to the other. Focusing on the EU energy production industry, this study adopts a data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach with the aim to assess whether mutual impact there exists between the economic and the environmental sides reflecting a win-win or a trade-off relationship. Furthermore, as prioritizing sustainability indicators has been recognized in the ongoing debate as a useful way to build effective sustainability practices, our assessment of the mutual impact accommodates the possibility that the resulting evidence may change when priority is placed, alternatively, to the economic or the environmental sustainability concern. The results show how the environmental goal enters in a trade-off relationship with the economic one when priority is placed on the environmental dimension. This casts doubts on the feasibility of a spontaneous path towards the strengthening of renewable sources.
引用
收藏
页码:2649 / 2661
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Is there a trade-off between environmental performance and financial sustainability in microfinance institutions? Evidence from South and Southeast Asia [J].
Ayayi, Ayi Gavriel ;
Wijesiri, Mahinda .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (04) :1552-1565
[2]   DEA-based hypothesis tests for comparing two groups of decision making units [J].
Banker, Rajiv D. ;
Zheng, Zhiqiang ;
Natarajan, Ram .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 206 (01) :231-238
[3]   MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD, CONSISTENCY AND DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS - A STATISTICAL FOUNDATION [J].
BANKER, RD .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (10) :1265-1273
[4]   Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :197-218
[5]   Impact of input substitution and output transformation on data envelopment analysis decisions [J].
Barnum, Darold ;
Coupet, Jason ;
Gleason, John ;
McWilliams, Abagail ;
Parhankangas, Annaleena .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (15) :1543-1556
[6]   The externalities of energy production in the context of development of clean energy generation [J].
Bielecki, Andrzej ;
Ernst, Sebastian ;
Skrodzka, Wioletta ;
Wojnicki, Igor .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (11) :11506-11530
[7]  
Bogetoft P, 2011, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V157, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7961-2
[8]   Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition [J].
Coelli, Tim ;
Lauwers, Ludwig ;
Van Huylenbroeck, Guido .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2007, 28 (1-2) :3-12
[9]   Stakeholder integration, environmental sustainability orientation and financial performance [J].
Danso, Albert ;
Adomako, Samuel ;
Lartey, Theophilus ;
Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph ;
Owusu-Yirenkyi, Diana .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 119 :652-662
[10]   Environmental sustainability orientation, competitive strategy and financial performance [J].
Danso, Albert ;
Adomako, Samuel ;
Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph ;
Owusu-Agyei, Samuel ;
Konadu, Renata .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 28 (05) :885-895