The Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared to Valsartan in Patients with Heart Failure and Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fractions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:6
作者
Kommu, Sharath [1 ,2 ]
Berg, Richard L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Marshfield Clin Hlth Syst, Dept Hosp Med, Rice Lake, WI 54868 USA
[2] UW Sch Publ Hlth & Med, Dept Med, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[3] Marshfield Clin Res Inst, Off Res Analyt & Comp, Marshfield, WI 54449 USA
关键词
sacubitril/valsartan; angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor; ARNI; valsartan; heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFpEF; heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction; HFmrEF; heart failure; NEUTRAL ENDOPEPTIDASE INHIBITION;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13061572
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Sacubitril/valsartan improves heart failure (HF) outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have shown inconsistent results. We conducted this meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan within this specific patient population. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE database and ClinicalTrials.gov and identified four RCTs that could be included in our analysis, with 3375 patients in the sacubitril/valsartan group and 3362 in the valsartan group. Results: Our study shows that, in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, sacubitril/valsartan was superior to valsartan in some of the key HF outcomes, such as the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ CSS), with a small but significant mean difference of 1.13 (95% confidence interval or CI of 0.15 to 2.11, p-value 0.024), an improvement in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (odds ratio or OR of 1.32, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.58, p-value 0.002), and the composite outcome of hospitalizations for HF and cardiovascular death, with a relative risk (RR) of 0.86 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.99, p-value 0.04). However, there was no additional benefit with sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan for the outcomes of cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality. In terms of side effects, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with a higher risk of hypotension when compared to valsartan (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.19, p-value < 0.0001), but did not show an increased risk of hyperkalemia or worsening renal function. Conclusions: In individuals with HFmrEF or HFpEF, sacubitril/valsartan can result in improvements in the HF outcomes of the KCCQ CSS, the NYHA class, and the composite outcome of hospitalization for HF and cardiovascular death when compared to valsartan. While there was a higher risk of hypotension with sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan, there was no corresponding increase in the risk of hyperkalemia or worsening renal function.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial [J].
Balduzzi, Sara ;
Ruecker, Gerta ;
Schwarzer, Guido .
EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 22 (04) :153-160
[2]   Neutral endopeptidase inhibition augments vascular actions of bradykinin in patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition [J].
Cruden, NLM ;
Fox, KAA ;
Ludlam, CA ;
Johnston, NR ;
Newby, DE .
HYPERTENSION, 2004, 44 (06) :913-918
[3]   Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Haseeb, Muhammad Talha ;
Aslam, Muhammad Nouman ;
Avanteeka, Fnu ;
Khalid, Umar Abdul Rehman ;
Ahmad, Dewan Zubaer ;
Senaratne, Mithum ;
Almaalouli, Bsher ;
Hirani, Shamsha .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (03)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Circulation, V145, pe1033, DOI [10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001073]
[5]  
Khalafallah A, 2010, MEDITERR J HEMATOL I, V2, DOI [10.1136/bmj.l4898, 10.4084/MJHID.2010.005]
[6]   Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition versus Enalapril in Heart Failure [J].
McMurray, John J. V. ;
Packer, Milton ;
Desai, Akshay S. ;
Gong, Jianjian ;
Lefkowitz, Martin P. ;
Rizkala, Adel R. ;
Rouleau, Jean L. ;
Shi, Victor C. ;
Solomon, Scott D. ;
Swedberg, Karl ;
Zile, Michael R. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (11) :993-1004
[7]   Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Patients With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction and Worsening Heart Failure [J].
Mentz, Robert J. ;
Ward, Jonathan H. ;
Hernandez, Adrian F. ;
Lepage, Serge ;
Morrow, David A. ;
Sarwat, Samiha ;
Sharma, Kavita ;
Starling, Randall C. ;
Velazquez, Eric J. ;
Williamson, Kristin M. ;
Desai, Akshay S. ;
Zieroth, Shelley ;
Solomon, Scott D. ;
Braunwald, Eugene .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 82 (01) :1-12
[8]  
Mujadzic Hata, 2022, J Innov Card Rhythm Manag, V13, P5164, DOI 10.19102/icrm.2022.130905
[9]   Beneficial and harmful effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis [J].
Nielsen, Emil Eik ;
Feinberg, Joshua Buron ;
Bu, Fan-Long ;
Olsen, Michael Hecht ;
Raymond, Ilan ;
Steensgaard-Hansen, Frank ;
Jakobsen, Janus Christian .
OPEN HEART, 2020, 7 (02)
[10]   Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Standard Medical Therapies on Plasma NT-proBNP Concentration and Submaximal Exercise Capacity in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction The PARALLAX Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Pieske, Burkert ;
Wachter, Rolf ;
Shah, Sanjiv J. ;
Baldridge, Abigail ;
Szeczoedy, Peter ;
Ibram, Ghionul ;
Shi, Victor ;
Zhao, Ziqiang ;
Cowie, Martin R. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 326 (19) :1919-1929