Machine learning model and nomogram to predict the risk of heart failure hospitalization in peritoneal dialysis patients

被引:0
作者
Xu, Liping [1 ]
Cao, Fang [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Lian [2 ]
Liu, Weihua [2 ]
Gao, Meizhu [2 ]
Zhang, Li [2 ]
Hong, Fuyuan [2 ,4 ]
Lin, Miao [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Fujian Prov Clin Coll, Fujian Prov Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Fujian Prov Hosp, Prov Clin Coll, Dept Nursing, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ, Fujian Prov Hosp, Prov Clin Coll, Dept nephrol, Fuzhou 350001, Peoples R China
关键词
Peritoneal dialysis; machine learning; all-cause mortality; heart failure; complications; MORTALITY; HEMODIALYSIS; VALIDATION; OUTCOMES; COMORBIDITY; ACCURACY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1080/0886022X.2024.2324071
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe study presented here aimed to establish a predictive model for heart failure (HF) and all-cause mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with machine learning (ML) algorithm.MethodsWe retrospectively included 1006 patients who initiated PD from 2010 to 2016. XGBoost, random forest (RF), and AdaBoost were used to train models for assessing risk for 1-year and 5-year HF hospitalization and mortality. The performance was validated using fivefold cross-validation. The optimal ML algorithm was used to construct the models to predictive the risk of the HF and all-cause mortality. The prediction performance of ML methods and Cox regression was compared.ResultsOver a median follow-up of 49 months. Two hundred and ninety-eight patients developed HF required hospitalization; 199 patients died during the follow-up. The RF model (AUC = 0.853) was the best performing model for predicting HF, and the XGBoost model (AUC = 0.871) was the best model for predicting mortality. Baseline moderate or severe renal disease, systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI), age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score were strongly associated with HF hospitalization, whereas age, CCI score, creatinine, age, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were the most significant predictors of mortality. For all the above endpoints, the ML models demonstrated better discrimination than Cox regression.ConclusionsWe developed and validated a novel method to predict the risk factors of HF and all-cause mortality that integrates readily available clinical, laboratory, and electrocardiographic variables to predict the risk of HF among PD patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] First-Year Outcomes of Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients in the United States
    Pulliam, Joseph
    Li, Nien-Chen
    Maddux, Franklin
    Hakim, Raymond
    Finkelstein, Frederic O.
    Lacson, Eduardo, Jr.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2014, 64 (05) : 761 - 769
  • [32] Predicting the Risk of 1-Year Mortality in Incident Dialysis Patients Accounting for Case-Mix Severity in Studies Using Administrative Data
    Quinn, Robert R.
    Laupacis, Andreas
    Hux, Janet E.
    Oliver, Matthew J.
    Austin, Peter C.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2011, 49 (03) : 257 - 266
  • [33] SARAN R, 2016, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V67, pS1, DOI [DOI 10.1053/J.AJKD.2015.12.014, 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.12.014]
  • [34] Multiple Machine Learnings Revealed Similar Predictive Accuracy for Prognosis of PNETs from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Database
    Song, Yiyan
    Gao, Shaowei
    Tan, Wulin
    Qiu, Zeting
    Zhou, Huaqiang
    Zhao, Yue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 9 (21): : 3971 - 3978
  • [35] High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
    Topol, Eric J.
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2019, 25 (01) : 44 - 56
  • [36] Heart Failure: Diagnosis, Severity Estimation and Prediction of Adverse Events Through Machine Learning Techniques
    Tripoliti, Evanthia E.
    Papadopoulos, Theofilos G.
    Karanasiou, Georgia S.
    Naka, Katerina K.
    Fotiadis, Dimitrios I.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 15 : 26 - 47
  • [37] How to adjust for comorbidity in survival studies in ESRD patients: A comparison of different indices
    van Manen, JG
    Korevaar, JC
    Dekker, FW
    Boeschoten, EW
    Bossuyt, PMM
    Krediet, RT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 40 (01) : 82 - 89
  • [38] Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?
    Weng, Stephen F.
    Reps, Jenna
    Kai, Joe
    Garibaldi, Jonathan M.
    Qureshi, Nadeem
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (04):
  • [39] ACCURACY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY VERSUS ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY IN DETECTING LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY - COMPARISON WITH POSTMORTEM MASS MEASUREMENTS
    WOYTHALER, JN
    SINGER, SL
    KWAN, OL
    MELTZER, RS
    REUBNER, B
    BOMMER, W
    DEMARIA, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1983, 2 (02) : 305 - 311
  • [40] Using machine learning to predict outcomes in psychosis\
    Young, Jonathan
    Kempton, Matthew J.
    McGuire, Philip
    [J]. LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 3 (10): : 908 - 909