Mineral dust optical properties for remote sensing and global modeling: A review

被引:12
作者
Castellanos, Patricia [1 ,11 ]
Colarco, Peter [2 ]
Espinosa, W. Reed [3 ]
Guzewich, Scott D. [4 ]
Levy, Robert C. [3 ]
Miller, Ron L. [5 ]
Chin, Mian [2 ]
Kahn, Ralph A. [3 ]
Kemppinen, Osku [2 ,6 ,10 ]
Moosmuller, Hans [7 ]
Nowottnick, Edward P. [7 ]
Rocha-Lima, Adriana [8 ]
Smith, Michael D. [9 ]
Yorks, John E. [7 ]
Yu, Hongbin [3 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Global Modeling & Assimilat Off, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA
[2] NASA, Atmospher Chem & Dynam Lab, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA
[3] NASA, Climate & Radiat Lab, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA
[4] NASA, Planetary Environm Lab, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA
[5] NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY USA
[6] Univ Maryland, Earth Syst Sci Interdisciplinary Ctr ESSIC, College Pk, MD USA
[7] NASA, Mesoscale Atmospher Proc Lab, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA
[8] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Phys Dept, Baltimore, MD USA
[9] NASA, Planetary Syst Lab, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA
[10] Meta Platforms Inc, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[11] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Code 610 1, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
关键词
Aeolian dust; Remote sensing; Earth system modeling; Mars dust; IMBEDDING T-MATRIX; COMPLEX REFRACTIVE-INDEX; SINGLE-SCATTERING ALBEDO; TIME-DOMAIN METHOD; INTEGRATED FORECASTING SYSTEM; DISCRETE-DIPOLE APPROXIMATION; TROPOSPHERIC AEROSOL SCHEME; SPECTRAL-RESOLUTION LIDAR; GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODEL; IN-SITU MEASUREMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2023.113982
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Dust plays a key role in many Earth system processes and is ubiquitous in the Martian atmosphere. Various intensive field campaigns, laboratory analyses, space-based remote sensing missions, and global modeling efforts aim to characterize dust optical properties. This is a bountiful time for dust scientists, and yet the interpretation of retrievals and comparison to models remains complicated by various conflicting assumptions that are part of each algorithm. For example, the conversion of satellite radiance measurements into products like aerosol optical depth for model evaluation depends upon aerosol properties like particle size and shape that are often prescribed and not part of the retrieval. Conversely, the model calculation of aerosol optical depth often uses different assumptions. The goal of this review is to first document algorithmic assumptions by various satellite retrieval products and models, and identify where there is consistency and where there are differences. In general, the differences documented in this paper reflect uncertainties resulting from incomplete observational characterization of dust aerosols and limitations in our understanding. Second, we note what observations might reduce uncertainties in our knowledge and bring greater consistency to retrievals and models, allowing for a more rigorous and harmonious comparison. The lack of comprehensive and realistic shape models for dust is an outstanding issue, such that closure between forward modeling from particle refractive index, shape, and size and observed optical properties cannot be achieved. Limitations in the computational methods that must be applied to model scattering from complex shapes also makes accurate optical modeling for dust challenging. Field observations indicate the persistence of coarse and giant dust particles at higher altitudes and farther downwind from their source than previously expected. Remote sensing retrieval algorithms based on observations at visible wavelengths have limited sensitivity to these particles and generally do not consider them, although a recent product based on longwave radiances is encouraging. Current measurements of the refractive index of bulk dust and fundamental dust minerology components such as hematite vary widely, inhibiting attempts to represent the variability in dust optical properties and forcing, as expected from different major dust source regions on Earth that have varying mineralogical composition. Some remote sensing retrieval algorithms allow for limited refractive index variability in their inversion solutions through mixing with other fine mode aerosol models, or optimizing the single scattering albedo, but Earth system models surveyed for this paper assume a globally uniform, size-invariant refractive index. Although no Martian dust samples have yet been returned to Earth, remote sensing observations indicate that Martian dust is globally homogenous in composition, and a single spectral refractive index assumption has been widely adopted to represent Martian dust. The lack of comprehensive, statistically representative measurements of dust particle microphysical properties (size distribution, morphology, complex index of refraction spectra, internal structure heterogeneity), and the resulting optical properties, limits our ability to verify the fidelity of these assumptions. A chain of measurements is needed, ranging from characterizing individual dust mineralogy components (e.g., pure hematite and goethite) to in situ sampling of complex atmospheric aerosol mixtures. Such results could be applied to both remote sensing retrievals that characterize the optical properties of the total aerosol burden in the atmosphere from total radiance measurements, and to global models that represent the total aerosol burden in the atmosphere by building it up from the balance of individual aerosol sources and sinks.
引用
收藏
页数:50
相关论文
共 452 条
  • [1] Geochemical and isotopic characterization of the Bodele Depression dust source and implications for transatlantic dust transport to the Amazon Basin
    Abouchami, Wafa
    Naethe, Kerstin
    Kumar, Ashwini
    Galer, Stephen J. G.
    Jochum, Klaus Peter
    Williams, Earle
    Horbe, Adriana M. C.
    Rosa, Joao W. C.
    Balsam, William
    Adams, David
    Mezger, Klaus
    Andreae, Meinrat O.
    [J]. EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2013, 380 : 112 - 123
  • [2] A review of coarse mineral dust in the Earth system
    Adebiyi, Adeyemi
    Kok, Jasper F.
    Murray, Benjamin J.
    Ryder, Claire L.
    Stuut, Jan-Berend W.
    Kahn, Ralph A.
    Knippertz, Peter
    Formenti, Paola
    Mahowald, Natalie M.
    Garcia-Pando, Carlos Perez
    Klose, Martina
    Ansmann, Albert
    Samset, Bjorn H.
    Ito, Akinori
    Balkanski, Yves
    Di Biagio, Claudia
    Romanias, Manolis N.
    Huang, Yue
    Meng, Jun
    [J]. AEOLIAN RESEARCH, 2023, 60
  • [3] Climate models miss most of the coarse dust in the atmosphere
    Adebiyi, Adeyemi A.
    Kok, Jasper F.
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2020, 6 (15)
  • [4] Modeling mineral aerosol production by wind erosion: Emission intensities and aerosol size distributions in source areas
    Alfaro, SC
    Gomes, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D16) : 18075 - 18084
  • [5] Mineral aerosol production by wind erosion: aerosol particle sizes and binding energies
    Alfaro, SC
    Gaudichet, A
    Gomes, L
    Maille, M
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1998, 25 (07) : 991 - 994
  • [6] The importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase clouds
    Atkinson, James D.
    Murray, Benjamin J.
    Woodhouse, Matthew T.
    Whale, Thomas F.
    Baustian, Kelly J.
    Carslaw, Kenneth S.
    Dobbie, Steven
    O'Sullivan, Daniel
    Malkin, Tamsin L.
    [J]. NATURE, 2013, 498 (7454) : 355 - 358
  • [7] Reevaluation of Mineral aerosol radiative forcings suggests a better agreement with satellite and AERONET data
    Balkanski, Y.
    Schulz, M.
    Claquin, T.
    Guibert, S.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2007, 7 : 81 - 95
  • [8] Development of two-moment cloud microphysics for liquid and ice within the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System Model (GEOS-5)
    Barahona, D.
    Molod, A.
    Bacmeister, J.
    Nenes, A.
    Gettelman, A.
    Morrison, H.
    Phillips, V.
    Eichmann, A.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 7 (04) : 1733 - 1766
  • [9] Polar nephelometer for light-scattering measurements of ice crystals
    Barkey, B
    Liou, KN
    [J]. OPTICS LETTERS, 2001, 26 (04) : 232 - 234
  • [10] Simulation of the Martian dust cycle with the GFDL mars GCME
    Basu, S
    Richardson, MI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 2004, 109 (E11) : 1 - 25