Single sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation exert no effect on sleepiness in patients with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia

被引:1
|
作者
Hohenester, Michaela [1 ,2 ]
Langguth, Berthold [1 ]
Wetter, Thomas Christian [1 ]
Geisler, Peter [1 ]
Schecklmann, Martin [1 ]
Reissmann, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Regensburg, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Barmherzigen Bruder Regensburg, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Regensburg, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
anodal tDCS; tRNS; hypersomnia; narcolepsy; idiopathic hypersomnia; vigilance; sleepiness; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; CLINICAL-FEATURES; LATENCY TEST; EXCITABILITY; BRAIN; VIGILANCE; TDCS; PERFORMANCE; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1288976
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
BackgroundHypersomnia poses major challenges to treatment providers given the limitations of available treatment options. In this context, the application of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) may open up new avenues to effective treatment. Preliminary evidence suggests both acute and longer-lasting positive effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on vigilance and sleepiness in hypersomniac patients. Based on these findings, the present study sought to investigate short-term effects of single sessions of tDCS and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on sleepiness in persons suffering from hypersomnia.MethodsA sample of 29 patients suffering from narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) was recruited from the Regensburg Sleep Disorder Center and underwent single sessions of tES (anodal tDCS, tRNS, sham) over the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on three consecutive days in a double-blind, sham-controlled, pseudorandomized crossover trial. The primary study endpoint was the mean reaction time measured by the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) before and directly after the daily tES sessions. Secondary endpoints were additional PVT outcome metrics as well as subjective outcome parameters (e.g., Karolinska Sleepiness Scale; KSS).ResultsThere were no significant treatment effects neither on objective (i.e., PVT) nor on subjective indicators of sleepiness.ConclusionWe could not demonstrate any clinically relevant effects of single sessions of tDCS or tRNS on objective or subjective measures of sleepiness in patients with hypersomnia. However, we cannot exclude that repeated sessions of tES may affect vigilance or sleepiness in hypersomniac patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation evaluation on fatigue and daytime sleepiness in Parkinson's disease
    Forogh, Bijan
    Rafiei, Maryam
    Arbabi, Amin
    Motamed, Mohammad Reza
    Madani, Seyed Pezhman
    Sajadi, Simin
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 38 (02) : 249 - 254
  • [22] The efficacy and safety of multiple sessions of multisite transcranial random noise stimulation in treating chronic tinnitus
    Mohsen, Samer
    Pourbakht, Akram
    Farhadi, Mohammad
    Mahmoudian, Saeid
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 85 (05) : 628 - 635
  • [23] Transcranial random noise stimulation is more effective than transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence
    Murphy, O. W.
    Hoy, K. E.
    Wong, D.
    Bailey, N. W.
    Fitzgerald, P. B.
    Segrave, R. A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (05) : 1370 - 1380
  • [24] Transcranial random noise stimulation benefits arithmetic skills
    Pasqualotto, Achille
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY, 2016, 133 : 7 - 12
  • [25] Transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation over the cerebellum differentially affect the cerebellum and primary motor cortex pathway
    Kawakami, Saki
    Inukai, Yasuto
    Ikarashi, Hitomi
    Watanabe, Hiraku
    Miyaguchi, Shota
    Otsuru, Naofumi
    Onishi, Hideaki
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 100 : 59 - 65
  • [26] Neuroprotective effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in a rat stroke model
    Notturno, Francesca
    Pace, Marta
    Zappasodi, Filippo
    Cam, Etrugul
    Bassetti, Claudio L.
    Uncini, Antonino
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 342 (1-2) : 146 - 151
  • [27] Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Borges, Helen
    Dufau, Alexandra
    Paneri, Bhaskar
    Woods, Adam J.
    Knotkova, Helena
    Bikson, Marom
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2020, (155):
  • [28] Noninvasive brain stimulation: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation
    Kim, Yun-Hee
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 56 (01): : 30 - 37
  • [29] Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates the effect of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on the excitability of spinal reflex
    Matsugi, Akiyoshi
    Okada, Yohei
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2020, 150 : 37 - 43
  • [30] Pressure Pain Thresholds Increase after Preconditioning 1 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Moloney, Tonya M.
    Witney, Alice G.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):