Single sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation exert no effect on sleepiness in patients with narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia

被引:1
|
作者
Hohenester, Michaela [1 ,2 ]
Langguth, Berthold [1 ]
Wetter, Thomas Christian [1 ]
Geisler, Peter [1 ]
Schecklmann, Martin [1 ]
Reissmann, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Regensburg, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Barmherzigen Bruder Regensburg, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Regensburg, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
anodal tDCS; tRNS; hypersomnia; narcolepsy; idiopathic hypersomnia; vigilance; sleepiness; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; CLINICAL-FEATURES; LATENCY TEST; EXCITABILITY; BRAIN; VIGILANCE; TDCS; PERFORMANCE; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1288976
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
BackgroundHypersomnia poses major challenges to treatment providers given the limitations of available treatment options. In this context, the application of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) may open up new avenues to effective treatment. Preliminary evidence suggests both acute and longer-lasting positive effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on vigilance and sleepiness in hypersomniac patients. Based on these findings, the present study sought to investigate short-term effects of single sessions of tDCS and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on sleepiness in persons suffering from hypersomnia.MethodsA sample of 29 patients suffering from narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia (IH) was recruited from the Regensburg Sleep Disorder Center and underwent single sessions of tES (anodal tDCS, tRNS, sham) over the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on three consecutive days in a double-blind, sham-controlled, pseudorandomized crossover trial. The primary study endpoint was the mean reaction time measured by the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) before and directly after the daily tES sessions. Secondary endpoints were additional PVT outcome metrics as well as subjective outcome parameters (e.g., Karolinska Sleepiness Scale; KSS).ResultsThere were no significant treatment effects neither on objective (i.e., PVT) nor on subjective indicators of sleepiness.ConclusionWe could not demonstrate any clinically relevant effects of single sessions of tDCS or tRNS on objective or subjective measures of sleepiness in patients with hypersomnia. However, we cannot exclude that repeated sessions of tES may affect vigilance or sleepiness in hypersomniac patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Idiopathic Hypersomnia a pilot study
    Galbiati, A.
    Abutalebi, J.
    Iannaccone, S.
    Borsa, V. M.
    Musteata, S.
    Zucconi, M.
    Giora, E.
    Ferini-Strambi, L.
    ARCHIVES ITALIENNES DE BIOLOGIE, 2016, 154 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [2] Improving working memory: Exploring the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
    Mulquiney, Paul G.
    Hoy, Kate E.
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    Fitzgerald, Paul B.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 122 (12) : 2384 - 2389
  • [3] Enhancing visual perceptual learning using transcranial electrical stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation outperforms both transcranial direct current and random noise stimulation
    He, Qing
    Zhu, Xinyi
    Fang, Fang
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2023, 23 (14): : 2
  • [4] Comparison of the Effects of Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability
    Ho, Kerrie-Anne
    Taylor, Janet L.
    Loo, Colleen K.
    JOURNAL OF ECT, 2015, 31 (01) : 67 - 72
  • [5] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation?
    Priori, Aberto
    Hallett, Mark
    Rothwell, John C.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2009, 2 (04) : 241 - 245
  • [6] Transcranial direct current stimulation treatment
    Eryilmaz, Gul
    Erkmen, Husnu
    Gotgcegtoz Gul, Isil
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 16 (02): : 138 - 142
  • [7] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Anxiety: Current Perspectives
    Stein, Dirson Joao
    Medeiros, Liciane Fernandes
    Caumo, Wolnei
    Torres, Iraci L. S.
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2020, 16 : 161 - 169
  • [8] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Schizophrenia
    Agarwal, Mahavir
    Shivakumar, Venkataram
    Bose, Anushree
    Subramaniam, Aditi
    Nawani, Hema
    Chhabra, Harleen
    Kalmady, Sunil V.
    Narayanaswamy, Janardhanan C.
    Venkatasubramanian, Ganesan
    CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 11 (03) : 118 - 125
  • [9] The added value of auditory cortex transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) after bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for tinnitus
    To, Wing Ting
    Ost, Jan
    Hart, John, Jr.
    De Ridder, Dirk
    Vanneste, Sven
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION, 2017, 124 (01) : 79 - 88
  • [10] Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Labruna, Ludovica
    Jamil, Asif
    Fresnoza, Shane
    Batsikadze, Giorgi
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Vanderschelden, Benjamin
    Ivry, Richard B.
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (01) : 8 - 15