Demystifying longitudinal data analyses using structural equation models in school psychology

被引:8
作者
Hall, Garret J. [1 ]
Clark, Kelly N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Psychol, 236 Audubon Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
Longitudinal data analysis; Structural equation modeling; School psychology; READING-ACHIEVEMENT; CURVE MODELS; R PACKAGE; GROWTH; ELEMENTARY; STUDENTS; STATE; ASSOCIATIONS; BEHAVIOR; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsp.2023.03.003
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Structural equation models (SEM) are a method of latent variable analysis that offer a high degree of flexibility in terms of modeling methods for applied research questions. Recent advancements associated with longitudinal SEM have unlocked innovative ways to decompose variance and to estimate mean trends over time (e.g., Allison et al., 2017; Berry & Willoughby, 2017; Hamaker et al., 2015; McArdle & Nesselroade, 2014). However, these longitudinal methods are not necessarily readily accessible to scholars seeking to advance theory and practice in school psy-chology. Importantly, not all longitudinal data are the same and not all longitudinal SEMs are the same; thus, analytic approaches must be appropriately matched to specific research aims to meaningfully inform school psychology theory and practice. The present article highlights recent advances in longitudinal SEMs, clarifies their similarities to other-perhaps more familiar --methods, and matches their applications to specific types of research questions. The intent of this work is to promote careful thinking about the correspondence between estimands, devel-opmental theory, and practical applications to foster specificity in testing quantitative questions in school psychology research and advance a more rigorous evaluation of longitudinal trends relevant to research and practice in the field.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 205
页数:25
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Allison PD., 2017, Socius, V3, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1177/2378023117710578, 10.1177/2378023117710578]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement, DOI DOI 10.1177/003435520104400407
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Map growth
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Longitudinal structural equation modeling
[5]   Persistence and Fade-Out of Educational-Intervention Effects: Mechanisms and Potential Solutions [J].
Bailey, Drew H. ;
Duncan, Greg J. ;
Cunha, Flavio ;
Foorman, Barbara R. ;
Yeager, David S. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2020, 21 (02) :55-97
[6]   State and Trait Effects on Individual Differences in Children's Mathematical Development [J].
Bailey, Drew H. ;
Watts, Tyler W. ;
Littlefield, Andrew K. ;
Geary, David C. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (11) :2017-2026
[7]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[8]  
Bear G., 2014, Technical manual for Delaware School Survey: Scales of school climate, bullying victimization, student engagement, and positive, punitive, and social-emotional learning techniques
[9]   On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged PanelModels: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse [J].
Berry, Daniel ;
Willoughby, Michael T. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 88 (04) :1186-1206
[10]   brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan [J].
Buerkner, Paul-Christian .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2017, 80 (01) :1-28