Invulnerability in innovation networks: the importance of technology cluster coupling and network centralization

被引:7
作者
Li, Li [1 ]
Lin, Haifen [2 ]
Lyu, Yibo [2 ]
Cheng, Lu [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ Light Ind, Coll Econ & Management, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Fac Econ & Management, Dalian, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Maritime Univ, Sch Maritime Econ & Management, Dalian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Network invulnerability; technology cluster; centralisation; patent citation; STRUCTURAL-PROPERTIES; PATENT CITATION; SOCIAL NETWORKS; MODERATING ROLE; ENERGY SECTOR; PERFORMANCE; COLLABORATION; TIES; OPPORTUNITIES; EMBEDDEDNESS;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2021.1979202
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The high fragility and failure rate of technological innovation networks prevent firms and industries from successfully developing innovation capacity and competitiveness. This study offers a network perspective on how technology cluster coupling reinforces innovation network invulnerability. By using 142 patent citation networks from the renewable energy industry, we conduct patent citation network and regression analyses of a mediating model. The results show that network centralisation plays a partly negative mediating role in the positive relationship between technology cluster coupling and innovation network invulnerability. This study enriches the antecedent study of innovation network invulnerability by expanding interactions from the individual-level to the community-level and contributes to the internal mechanisms of technology cluster coupling and network invulnerability by emphasising the critical role of network centralisation. Our findings offer implications for policy makers who seek to govern technology clusters aimed at strengthening the steady development of innovation networks.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 463
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Better with Age? Tie Longevity and the Performance Implications of Bridging and Closure [J].
Baum, Joel A. C. ;
McEvily, Bill ;
Rowley, Tim J. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (02) :529-546
[2]   The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology [J].
Borgatti, SP ;
Foster, PC .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2003, 29 (06) :991-1013
[3]   ALGORITHM FOR CLUSTERING RELATIONAL DATA WITH APPLICATIONS TO SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON WITH MULTIDIMENSIONAL-SCALING [J].
BREIGER, RL ;
BOORMAN, SA ;
ARABIE, P .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 12 (03) :328-383
[4]  
Carlsson Bo., 1997, Technological systems and industrial dynamics, V10, P299, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-6133-0_11
[5]   A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry [J].
Cattani, Gino ;
Ferriani, Simone .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (06) :824-844
[6]   Structural properties and inter-organizational knowledge flows of patent citation network: The case of organic solar cells [J].
Choe, Hochull ;
Lee, Duk Hee ;
Kim, Hee Dae ;
Seo, Il Won .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 55 :361-370
[7]   Actors' Heterogeneity in Innovation Networks [J].
Corsaro, Daniela ;
Cantu, Chiara ;
Tunisini, Annalisa .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2012, 41 (05) :780-789
[8]   Bilateral collaboration and the emergence of innovation networks [J].
Cowan, Robin ;
Jonard, Nicolas ;
Zimmermann, Jean-Benoit .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (07) :1051-1067
[9]   Lock-in or lock-out? How structural properties of knowledge networks affect regional resilience [J].
Crespo, Joan ;
Suire, Raphael ;
Vicente, Jerome .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 14 (01) :199-219
[10]  
Crowston K., 2006, Knowledge Technology & Policy, V18, P65, DOI 10.1007/s12130-006-1004-8