Diversified or specialised: firms' patent portfolio strategies under heterogeneous technology standards

被引:1
作者
Yu, Rong-jian [1 ]
Ding, Rui [1 ]
Yao, Li [1 ]
Cen, Jie [1 ]
Xiang, Li-yao [2 ]
Deng, Zhao [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Businesss Adm, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business Adm, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Technology standards; patent portfolio; heterogeneity; innovation quality; MODERATING ROLE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; RELATEDNESS; MECHANISMS; PROMOTE; MATTER;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2023.2251068
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Research has highlighted the role of patent portfolio strategy on firms' innovation without elaborating on how to layout the diversity of patent portfolios to improve innovation quality. Drawing on the resource-based view and institutional theory, this research attempts to extend patent portfolio-innovation debate by examining the moderating effects of policy or specifically, technology standard on the patenting-innovation relationship. We argue that the leverage of technology standard could help firms optimise patent portfolios by accessing information, reducing transaction costs, and promoting complementary innovation, and therefore leads to higher innovation quality. Moreover, considering heterogeneous technology standards, in the context of relatively complex and rapidly updated technology standards, specialised patent portfolios are more significant for firms to enhance substantive innovation. Our analysis of data from 729 Chinese manufacturing listed companies provides supports for both the moderating role of technology standard on the patent portfolio-innovation relationship. This paper contributes to patent management literature by elaborating upon the mechanisms of how technology standard can be leveraged to capture value from firms' patent portfolios.
引用
收藏
页码:4331 / 4346
页数:16
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions [J].
Ahuja, G ;
Lampert, CM .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (6-7) :521-543
[2]   Patent portfolio diversity and firm profitability: A question of specialization or diversification? [J].
Appio, Francesco P. ;
De Luca, Luigi M. ;
Morgan, Robert ;
Martini, Antonella .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 101 :255-267
[3]   The light and shade of knowledge recombination: Insights from a general-purpose technology [J].
Appio, Francesco Paolo ;
Martini, Antonella ;
Fantoni, Gualtiero .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 125 :154-165
[4]   DOMINANT DESIGNS, INNOVATION SHOCKS, AND THE FOLLOWER'S DILEMMA [J].
Argyres, Nicholas ;
Bigelow, Lyda ;
Nickerson, Jack A. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (02) :216-234
[5]   Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center Database [J].
Baron, Justus ;
Spulber, Daniel F. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2018, 27 (03) :462-503
[6]   How Innovative are UK Firms? Evidence from the Fourth UK Community Innovation Survey on Synergies between Technological and Organizational Innovations [J].
Battisti, Giuliana ;
Stoneman, Paul .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 21 (01) :187-206
[7]   Nuclear reactors' construction costs: The role of lead-time, standardization and technological progress [J].
Berthelemy, Michel ;
Rangel, Lina Escobar .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 82 :118-130
[8]   The impact of patents and standards on macroeconomic growth: a panel approach covering four countries and 12 sectors [J].
Blind, Knut ;
Jungmittag, Andre .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2008, 29 (01) :51-60
[9]  
Blind K, 2022, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V47, P979, DOI 10.1007/s10961-021-09864-3
[10]   The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets [J].
Blind, Knut ;
Petersen, Soeren S. ;
Riillo, Cesare A. F. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (01) :249-264