Outcomes of low-risk birth care during the Covid-19 pandemic: A cohort study from a tertiary care center in Lithuania

被引:1
作者
Poskiene, Ingrida [1 ]
Minkauskiene, Meile [1 ]
Kregzdyte, Rima [2 ]
Jariene, Kristina [1 ]
Kliucinskas, Mindaugas [1 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Med Acad, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Med Acad, Dept Prevent Med, Kaunas, Lithuania
来源
OPEN MEDICINE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
midwife; low-risk birth; Covid-19; infection; birth outcome;
D O I
10.1515/med-2023-0720
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
According to the World Health Organization, midwife-led care is the most appropriate and cost-effective type of perinatal care. As the Covid-19 pandemic with its drastic changes and challenges for the health systems and the medical staff made large adjustments to the healthcare delivery system, midwife-led care became an even more important supportive tool in maintaining unnecessary interventions. This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the outcomes of midwife-led care and team-led care in low-risk births between the Covid-19 pandemic and non-Covid-19 pandemic period. The total studied population was 1,185 singleton births and consisted of 727 births during the non-Covid-19 period and 458 births from the Covid-19 period. The study revealed the safety of low-risk birth care during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in both groups. The maternal and perinatal outcomes remained stable without an increased rate of unsuccessful vaginal births and newborn asphyxia; moreover, birth care of low-risk women provided by midwives preserved autonomy, integrity, and resistance to responding to a disaster. The aforementioned results exhibit that high-quality, safe supervision by midwives in low-risk births can be provided even in high-stress circumstances.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1996, CAR NORM BIRTH PRACT
  • [2] A cross-national study of factors associated with women's perinatal mental health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Basu, Archana
    Kim, Hannah H.
    Basaldua, Rebecca
    Choi, Karmel W.
    Charron, Lily
    Kelsall, Nora
    Hernandez-Diaz, Sonia
    Wyszynski, Diego F.
    Koenen, Karestan C.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):
  • [3] Carson A., 2016, Annals of Global Health, V82, P381
  • [4] The Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pregnant Women
    Cigaran, Ruxandra-Gabriela
    Botezatu, Radu
    Mineca, Elma-Maria
    Gica, Corina
    Panaitescu, Anca Maria
    Peltecu, Gheorghe
    Gica, Nicolae
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (06)
  • [5] The impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on maternity care in Europe
    Coxon, Kirstie
    Turienzo, Cristina Fernandez
    Kweekel, Liselotte
    Goodarzi, Bahareh
    Brigante, Lia
    Simon, Agnes
    Lanau, Miriam Morlans
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2020, 88
  • [6] Fransson E, 2020, MENTAL HLTH PREGNANT, V18
  • [7] Freeze J, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 51ST ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), P913
  • [8] Impact of labor and delivery unit policy modifications on maternal and neonatal outcomes during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
    Greene, Naomi H.
    Kilpatrick, Sarah J.
    Wong, Melissa S.
    Ozimek, John A.
    Naqvi, Mariam
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2020, 2 (04)
  • [9] The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Hawco, Sarah
    Rolnik, Daniel L.
    Woolner, Andrea
    Cameron, Natalie J.
    Wyness, Victoria
    Mol, Ben W.
    Black, Mairead
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 274 : 117 - 127
  • [10] Rao MG, 2022, AM J PERINAT, V22, P1877