Sensor cost-effectiveness analysis for data-driven fault detection and diagnostics in commercial buildings*

被引:5
作者
Zhang, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Leach, Matt [2 ]
Chen, Jianli [3 ]
Hu, Yuqing [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Penn State Univ, State Coll, PA USA
关键词
Building sensors; Cost analysis; Cost effectiveness; Threshold marginal cost; Building fault detection and diagnostics; Fault prevalence; BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; SYSTEM; ENERGY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2022.125577
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Data-driven building fault detection and diagnostics (FDD) is heavily dependent on sensors. However, common sensors from Building Automation Systems are not optimized to maximize accuracy in FDD. Installing additional sensors that provide more detailed building system information is key to maximizing the performance of FDD solutions. In this paper, we present a sensor cost analysis workflow to quantify the economic implications of installing new sensors for FDD using the concept of sensor threshold marginal cost (STMC). STMC does not represent actual sensor cost. Rather, it represents a target cost based on the economic benefit that would be realized through improved FDD performance and one or more specified economic criteria. We calculate STMCs for multiple possible fault types and use fault prevalence information to aggregate STMCs into a single dollar value to determine the cost-effectiveness of a potential sensor investment. We conducted a case study using Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Flexible Research Platform (FRP) test facility as a reference. The case study dem-onstrates the feasibility of the analysis and highlights the key cost considerations in sensor selection for FDD. The results also indicate that identifying and installing the few key sensor(s) is critical to cost-effectively improve FDD performance.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Alsaleem F. M., 2014, HVAC SYSTEM CLOUD BA
  • [2] Cost-Benefit Optimization of Structural Health Monitoring Sensor Networks
    Capellari, Giovanni
    Chatzi, Eleni
    Mariani, Stefano
    [J]. SENSORS, 2018, 18 (07)
  • [3] Chen YX, 2005, IEEE MILIT COMMUN C, P1097
  • [4] Relocatable, Automated Cost-Benefit Analysis for Marine Sensor Network Design
    D'Este, Claire
    de Souza, Paulo
    Sharman, Chris
    Allen, Simon
    [J]. SENSORS, 2012, 12 (03): : 2874 - 2898
  • [5] Department_of_Energy US, 2013, ENERGYPLUS EN SIM SO
  • [6] Dibowski H, 2016, IEEE INT C EMERG
  • [7] A BIM-enabled information infrastructure for building energy Fault Detection and Diagnostics
    Dong, Bing
    O'Neill, Zheng
    Li, Zhengwei
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 44 : 197 - 211
  • [8] Frank S., 2019, Metrics and Methods to Assess Building Fault Detection and Diagnosis Tools Metrics and Methods to Assess Building Fault Detection and Diagnosis Tools
  • [9] Frank S., 2016, Tech. Rep.
  • [10] Gao Y., 2003, P 2 ACM INT C WIR SE