The antecedents and consequences of workplace envy: A meta-analytic review

被引:55
作者
Li, Miaomiao [1 ]
Xu, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Kwan, Ho Kwong [2 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] China Europe Int Business Sch CEIBS, Org Behav & Human Resource Management Dept, Shanghai 201206, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Workplace envy; Social comparison; Social desirability; Moral disengagement; Meta-analysis; COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIORS; LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE; DISPOSITIONAL ENVY; LIFE SATISFACTION; JOB-PERFORMANCE; EMPLOYEE ENVY; MODEL; EMOTION; CLIMATE; JUSTICE;
D O I
10.1007/s10490-021-09772-y
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Extensive research has been conducted into the antecedents and consequences of workplace envy, but there have been limited meta-analytic reviews. This meta-analysis draws on social comparison theory to examine studies of envy in the workplace and develop a comprehensive model of the antecedents and consequences of workplace envy. We reconcile the divergent findings in the literature by building a model of three types of workplace envy that distinguishes between episodic, dispositional, and general envy. The results suggest that individual differences (e.g., narcissism, neuroticism), organizational contexts (e.g., competition, position), and social desirability are predictors of workplace envy. They also reveal that workplace envy is related to organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs), negative behaviors (e.g., ostracism, social undermining), negative emotions, organizational perceptions (i.e., engagement, satisfaction), turnover intentions, and moral disengagement. We test the moderating roles of envy types, measurement approaches, and causal directions. The results reveal that these moderators have little differences, and that some variables (e.g., self-esteem, fairness) may be both antecedents and consequences of workplace envy. Finally, we suggest that future research into workplace envy should investigate contextual predictors and moderators of the social comparison process that triggers envy. This meta-analysis can serve as a foundation for future research into workplace envy.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 35
页数:35
相关论文
共 127 条
[81]   Can idiosyncratic deals promote perceptions of competitive climate, felt ostracism, and turnover? [J].
Ng, Thbmas W. H. .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2017, 99 :118-131
[82]   Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring [J].
Ones, DS ;
Viswesvaran, C ;
Reiss, AD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 81 (06) :660-679
[83]   Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research [J].
Podsakoff, PM ;
MacKenzie, SB ;
Paine, JB ;
Bachrach, DG .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (03) :513-563
[84]   THEY WANT WHAT I'VE GOT (I THINK): THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF ATTRIBUTING COWORKER BEHAVIOR TO ENVY [J].
Puranik, Harshad ;
Koopman, Joel ;
Vough, Heather C. ;
Gamache, Daniel L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 44 (02) :424-449
[85]   Keeping (Future) Rivals Down: Temporal Social Comparison Predicts Coworker Social Undermining via Future Status Threat and Envy [J].
Reh, Susan ;
Troster, Christian ;
Van Quaquebeke, Niels .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 103 (04) :399-415
[86]  
ROBERTSON M, 2014, THESIS
[87]  
Rosenthal R., 2007, ESSENTIALS BEHAV RES, V3rd
[88]   Comparing lots before and after: Promotion rejectees' invidious reactions to promotees [J].
Schaubroeck, J ;
Lam, SSK .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2004, 94 (01) :33-47
[89]   Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices [J].
Schriesheim, CA ;
Castro, SL ;
Cogliser, CC .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 1999, 10 (01) :63-113
[90]   Opening the black box: Why and when workplace exclusion affects social reconnection behaviour, health, and attitudes [J].
Scott, Kristin L. ;
Tams, Stefan ;
Schippers, Michaela C. ;
Lee, KiYoung .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 24 (02) :239-255