Prior math achievement and inventive production predict learning from productive failure

被引:6
作者
Kapur, Manu [1 ]
Saba, Janan [2 ]
Roll, Ido [2 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Humanities Social & Polit Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Technion, Fac Educ Sci & Technol, Haifa, Israel
关键词
MULTIDIGIT ADDITION; DIRECT INSTRUCTION; GUIDANCE; STUDENTS; EXPERTISE; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1038/s41539-023-00165-y
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A frequent concern about constructivist instruction is that it works well, mainly for students with higher domain knowledge. We present findings from a set of two quasi-experimental pretest-intervention-posttest studies investigating the relationship between prior math achievement and learning in the context of a specific type of constructivist instruction, Productive Failure. Students from two Singapore public schools with significantly different prior math achievement profiles were asked to design solutions to complex problems prior to receiving instruction on the targeted concepts. Process results revealed that students who were significantly dissimilar in prior math achievement seemed to be strikingly similar in terms of their inventive production, that is, the variety of solutions they were able to design. Interestingly, it was inventive production that had a stronger association with learning from PF than pre-existing differences in math achievement. These findings, consistent across both topics, demonstrate the value of engaging students in opportunities for inventive production while learning math, regardless of prior math achievement.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, The Handbook of Social Psychology
[2]   Problem-solving or Explicit Instruction: Which Should Go First When Element Interactivity Is High? [J].
Ashman, Greg ;
Kalyuga, Slava ;
Sweller, John .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 32 (01) :229-247
[3]   Motivation and Transfer: The Role of Mastery-Approach Goals in Preparation for Future Learning [J].
Belenky, Daniel M. ;
Nokes-Malach, Timothy J. .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2012, 21 (03) :399-432
[4]  
Brand C., 2021, P 15 INT C LEARNING, P115
[5]  
Carpenter T. P., 1984, J RES MATH EDUC, V15, P179, DOI [DOI 10.2307/748348, https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.15.3.0179]
[6]   A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children's multidigit addition and subtraction [J].
Carpenter, TP ;
Franke, ML ;
Jacobs, VR ;
Fennema, E ;
Empson, SB .
JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 1998, 29 (01) :3-20
[7]  
Carroll WM., 1997, MATH ED, V2, P18
[8]  
Charles K., 2000, Educational Studies in Mathematics, V43, P191, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1017513716026
[9]   Invention Versus Direct Instruction: For Some Content, It's a Tie [J].
Chase, Catherine C. ;
Klahr, David .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 26 (06) :582-596
[10]   DIY productive failure: boosting performance in a large undergraduate biology course [J].
Chowrira, Sunita G. ;
Smith, Karen M. ;
Dubois, Patrick J. ;
Roll, Ido .
NPJ SCIENCE OF LEARNING, 2019, 4 (01)