Radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein; does the choice of monopolar or bipolar catheters affect outcomes?

被引:0
作者
Diken, Adem, I [1 ]
Ozyalcin, Sertan [2 ]
Hafez, Izzet [1 ]
Alemdaroglu, Utku [1 ]
Tunel, Hueseyin A. [1 ]
Hanedan, Onur [3 ]
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, Fac Med, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Adana, Turkiye
[2] Hitit Univ, Fac Med, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Corum, Turkiye
[3] Univ Hlth Sci, Ahi Evren Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg Training & Res, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Trabzon, Turkiye
关键词
Endovenous radiofrequency ablation; chronic venous insufficiency; monopolar; bipolar; segmental ablation; CLINICAL-PRACTICE-GUIDELINES; CHRONIC VENOUS DISEASE; VARICOSE-VEINS; VASCULAR-SURGERY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1177/02683555231174997
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives Radiofrequency-based procedure is one of the leading methods of endovenous thermal ablation. The most fundamental difference with regards to currently available radiofrequency ablation systems is the way of electric current flow given to the vein wall; bipolar segmental and monopolar ablation. This study aimed to compare the monopolar ablation method with conventional bipolar segmental endovenous radiofrequency ablation method for the management of incompetent saphenous veins. Methods Between November 2019 and November 2021, 121 patients with incompetent varicose veins who were treated either with the F-Care/monopolar (N = 49) or ClosureFast/bipolar (N = 72) were included in the study. A single extremity of each patient with isolated great saphenous vein insufficiency was enrolled. The differences between the two groups in demographic parameters, disease severity, treated veins, peri- and postoperative complications, and treatment efficacy indicators were retrospectively evaluated. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding demographic parameters, disease severity, and treated veins in preoperative period (p > 0,05). The average procedural time was 21.4 +/- 4 minutes in the monopolar group, while it was 17.1 +/- 3 minutes in the bipolar group. In both groups, the venous clinical severity scores declined significantly compared with the preoperative period, however; there was no difference between groups (p > 0,05). The occlusion rate of the saphenofemoral junction and proximal saphenous vein after 1 year was 94.1% in the bipolar group and 91.8% in the monopolar group (p = 0.4) while there was a significant difference in the occlusion rate of the shaft and distal part of the saphenous vein (93.2% in the bipolar group and 80.4% in the monopolar group, p = 0.04). Postoperative complications (bruising and skin pigmentation) were slightly higher in the bipolar group (p = 0.02, p = 0.01). Conclusions Both systems are effective in treating the venous insufficiency of the lower extremity. Monopolar system revealed a better early postoperative course with similar occlusion rate of the proximal part of saphenous vein compared with bipolar system, however; the occlusion of the lower half of the saphenous vein was significantly lower which may negatively affect long-term occlusion rates and recurrence of the disease.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 369
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Radiofrequency ablation and laser ablation in the treatment of varicose veins
    Almeida, Jose I.
    Raines, Jeffrey K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 20 (04) : 547 - 552
  • [2] Results of endovenous ClosureFast treatment for varicose veins in an outpatient setting
    Bisang, U.
    Meier, T. O.
    Enzler, M.
    Thalhammer, C.
    Husmann, M.
    Amann-Vesti, B. R.
    [J]. PHLEBOLOGY, 2012, 27 (03) : 118 - 123
  • [3] Ablation of the great saphenous vein with F-care versus Closurefast endovenous radiofrequency therapy: Double-blinded prospective study
    Bitargil, Macit
    Kilic, Helin E.
    [J]. PHLEBOLOGY, 2020, 35 (08) : 561 - 565
  • [4] Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins in chronic venous disease of the lower limbs - UIP consensus document. Part II. Anatomy
    Cavezzi, A
    Labropoulos, N
    Partsch, H
    Ricci, S
    Caggiati, A
    Myers, K
    Nicolaides, A
    Smith, PC
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 31 (03) : 288 - 299
  • [5] The occlusion rate and patterns of saphenous vein after radiofrequency ablation
    Choi, Jung Hyun
    Park, Ho-Chul
    Joh, Jin Hyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 84 (02): : 107 - 113
  • [6] Radiofrequency-Powered Segmental Thermal Obliteration Carried out with the ClosureFast Procedure: Results at 1 Year
    Creton, Denis
    Pichot, Olivier
    Sessa, Carmine
    Proebstle, T. M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 24 (03) : 360 - 366
  • [7] The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum
    Gloviczki, Peter
    Comerota, Anthony J.
    Dalsing, Michael C.
    Eklof, Bo G.
    Gillespie, David L.
    Gloviczki, Monika L.
    Lohr, Joann M.
    McLafferty, Robert B.
    Meissner, Mark H.
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Padberg, Frank T.
    Pappas, Peter J.
    Passman, Marc A.
    Raffetto, Joseph D.
    Vasquez, Michael A.
    Wakefield, Thomas W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 : 2S - 48S
  • [8] Radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins: Best practice techniques and evidence
    Goodyear, Stephen J.
    Nyamekye, Isaac K.
    [J]. PHLEBOLOGY, 2015, 30 : 9 - 17
  • [9] A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, using a 1470 nm diode laser in combination with a Tulip-Tip™ fiber versus radiofrequency (Closure FAST™ VNUS®), in the treatment of primary varicose veins
    Kempeneers, Anne-Catherine
    Bechter-Hugl, Beate
    Thomis, Sarah
    van den Bussche, Daphne
    Vuylsteke, Marc E.
    Vuylsteke, Mathieu M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY, 2022, 41 (04) : 322 - 331
  • [10] Treatment of primary varicose veins by endovenous obliteration with the VNUS closure system: Results of a prospective multicentre study
    Nicolini, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 29 (04) : 433 - 439