Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review

被引:13
作者
Grueter, Alexander A. J. [1 ,2 ]
Van Lieshout, Annabel S. S. [1 ,2 ]
van Oostendorp, Stefan E. E. [1 ,3 ]
Henckens, Sofie P. G. [2 ,4 ]
Ket, Johannes C. F. [5 ]
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. S. [4 ]
Toorenvliet, Boudewijn R. R. [6 ]
Tanis, Pieter J. J. [4 ,7 ]
Bonjer, Hendrik J. J. [1 ]
Tuynman, Jurriaan B. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Surg, Amsterdam UMC Locat, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Treatment & Qual Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis, Dept Surg, Vondellaan 13, Beverwijk, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Surg, Amsterdam UMC Locat, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Lib, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Ikazia Hosp, Dept Surg, Montessoriweg 1, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Erasmus MC, Dept Surg Oncol & Gastrointestinal Surg, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2023年 / 37卷 / 06期
关键词
Surgical quality assessment; SQA; Laparoscopy; Video-based; Technical skills; Assessment tool; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS OCHRA; NATIONAL-TRAINING-PROGRAM; ERROR RATING TOOL; RECTAL-CANCER; COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT; OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; COLORECTAL-SURGERY; PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-023-10076-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundQuality of surgery has substantial impact on both short- and long-term clinical outcomes. This stresses the need for objective surgical quality assessment (SQA) for education, clinical practice and research purposes. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive overview of all video-based objective SQA tools in laparoscopic procedures and their validity to objectively assess surgical performance.MethodsPubMed, Embase.com and Web of Science were systematically searched by two reviewers to identify all studies focusing on video-based SQA tools of technical skills in laparoscopic surgery performed in a clinical setting. Evidence on validity was evaluated using a modified validation scoring system.ResultsFifty-five studies with a total of 41 video-based SQA tools were identified. These tools were used in 9 different fields of laparoscopic surgery and were divided into 4 categories: the global assessment scale (GAS), the error-based assessment scale (EBAS), the procedure-specific assessment tool (PSAT) and artificial intelligence (AI). The number of studies focusing on these four categories were 21, 6, 31 and 3, respectively. Twelve studies validated the SQA tool with clinical outcomes. In 11 of those studies, a positive association between surgical quality and clinical outcomes was found.ConclusionThis systematic review included a total of 41 unique video-based SQA tools to assess surgical technical skills in various domains of laparoscopic surgery. This study suggests that validated SQA tools enable objective assessment of surgical performance with relevance for clinical outcomes, which can be used for training, research and quality improvement programs.
引用
收藏
页码:4279 / 4297
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measuring non-technical skills of anaesthesiologists in the operating room: a systematic review of assessment tools and their measurement properties
    Boet, S.
    Larrigan, S.
    Martin, L.
    Liu, H.
    Sullivan, K. J.
    Etherington, C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 121 (06) : 1218 - 1226
  • [42] Systematic Review of Voluntary Participation in simulation-Based Laparoscopic Skills Training Motivators and Barriers for Surgical Trainee Attendance
    Gostlow, Hannah
    Marlow, Nicholas
    Babidge, Wendy
    Maddern, Guy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 74 (02) : 306 - 318
  • [43] Deliberate Practice on a Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Simulator Enhances the Quality of Surgical Technical Skills
    Crochet, Patrice
    Aggarwal, Rajesh
    Dubb, Sukhpreet Singh
    Ziprin, Paul
    Rajaretnam, Niroshini
    Grantcharov, Teodor
    Ericsson, K. Anders
    Darzi, Ara
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 253 (06) : 1216 - 1222
  • [44] Validity of scoring systems for the assessment of technical and non-technical skills in ophthalmic surgery-a systematic review
    Wood, Thomas Charles
    Maqsood, Sundas
    Nanavaty, Mayank A.
    Rajak, Saul
    [J]. EYE, 2021, 35 (07) : 1833 - 1849
  • [45] Objective assessment tools in laparoscopic or robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: A systematic review
    Tesfai, Freweini Martha
    Nagi, Jasleen
    Morrison, Iona
    Boal, Matt
    Olaitan, Adeola
    Chandrasekaran, Dhivya
    Stoyanov, Danail
    Lanceley, Anne
    Francis, Nader
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2024, 103 (08) : 1480 - 1497
  • [46] Technical, Non-Technical, or Both? A Scoping Review of Skills in Simulation-Based Surgical Training
    Rosendal, Amalie Asmind
    Sloth, Sigurd Beier
    Rolfing, Jan Duedal
    Bie, Magnus
    Jensen, Rune Dall
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 80 (05) : 731 - 749
  • [47] A Systematic Review on Low-cost Box Models to Achieve Basic and Advanced Laparoscopic Skills During Modern Surgical Training
    Gravante, Gianpiero
    Venditti, Dario
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (02) : 109 - 120
  • [48] Full title: Video-based approaches in health education: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Morgado, Mariana
    Botelho, Joao
    Machado, Vanessa
    Mendes, Jose Joao
    Adesope, Olusola
    Proenca, Luis
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [49] Association between Surgical Technical Skills and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
    Woods, Michael S.
    Liberman, Joshua N.
    Rui, Pinyao
    Wiggins, Emily
    White, Joan
    Ramshaw, Bruce
    Stulberg, Jonah J.
    [J]. JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2023, 27 (01)
  • [50] Quality and efficacy of Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) quality assessment tools and discussion checklists: a systematic review
    Brown, George T. F.
    Bekker, Hilary L.
    Young, Alastair L.
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)