Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review

被引:13
|
作者
Grueter, Alexander A. J. [1 ,2 ]
Van Lieshout, Annabel S. S. [1 ,2 ]
van Oostendorp, Stefan E. E. [1 ,3 ]
Henckens, Sofie P. G. [2 ,4 ]
Ket, Johannes C. F. [5 ]
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. S. [4 ]
Toorenvliet, Boudewijn R. R. [6 ]
Tanis, Pieter J. J. [4 ,7 ]
Bonjer, Hendrik J. J. [1 ]
Tuynman, Jurriaan B. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Surg, Amsterdam UMC Locat, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Treatment & Qual Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis, Dept Surg, Vondellaan 13, Beverwijk, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Surg, Amsterdam UMC Locat, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Lib, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Ikazia Hosp, Dept Surg, Montessoriweg 1, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Erasmus MC, Dept Surg Oncol & Gastrointestinal Surg, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2023年 / 37卷 / 06期
关键词
Surgical quality assessment; SQA; Laparoscopy; Video-based; Technical skills; Assessment tool; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS OCHRA; NATIONAL-TRAINING-PROGRAM; ERROR RATING TOOL; RECTAL-CANCER; COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT; OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; COLORECTAL-SURGERY; PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-023-10076-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundQuality of surgery has substantial impact on both short- and long-term clinical outcomes. This stresses the need for objective surgical quality assessment (SQA) for education, clinical practice and research purposes. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive overview of all video-based objective SQA tools in laparoscopic procedures and their validity to objectively assess surgical performance.MethodsPubMed, Embase.com and Web of Science were systematically searched by two reviewers to identify all studies focusing on video-based SQA tools of technical skills in laparoscopic surgery performed in a clinical setting. Evidence on validity was evaluated using a modified validation scoring system.ResultsFifty-five studies with a total of 41 video-based SQA tools were identified. These tools were used in 9 different fields of laparoscopic surgery and were divided into 4 categories: the global assessment scale (GAS), the error-based assessment scale (EBAS), the procedure-specific assessment tool (PSAT) and artificial intelligence (AI). The number of studies focusing on these four categories were 21, 6, 31 and 3, respectively. Twelve studies validated the SQA tool with clinical outcomes. In 11 of those studies, a positive association between surgical quality and clinical outcomes was found.ConclusionThis systematic review included a total of 41 unique video-based SQA tools to assess surgical technical skills in various domains of laparoscopic surgery. This study suggests that validated SQA tools enable objective assessment of surgical performance with relevance for clinical outcomes, which can be used for training, research and quality improvement programs.
引用
收藏
页码:4279 / 4297
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Video-based coaching in surgical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Augestad, Knut Magne
    Butt, Khayam
    Ignjatovic, Dejan
    Keller, Deborah S.
    Kiran, Ravi
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (02): : 521 - 535
  • [22] Assessment of surgical performance of laparoscopic benign hiatal surgery: a systematic review
    Bilgic, Elif
    Al Mahroos, Mohammed
    Landry, Tara
    Fried, Gerald M.
    Vassiliou, Melina C.
    Feldman, Liane S.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (11): : 3798 - 3805
  • [23] Direct Observation versus Endoscopic Video Recording-Based Rating with the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Training of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Nickel, Felix
    Hendrie, Jonathan D.
    Stock, Christian
    Salama, Mohamed
    Preukschas, Anas A.
    Senft, Jonas D.
    Kowalewski, Karl F.
    Wagner, Martin
    Kenngott, Hannes G.
    Linke, Georg R.
    Fischer, Lars
    Mueller-Stich, Beat P.
    EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 57 (1-2) : 1 - 9
  • [24] The effect of video review of resident laparoscopic surgical skills measured by self- and external assessment
    Herrera-Almario, Gabriel E.
    Kirk, Katherine
    Guerrero, Veronica T.
    Jeong, Kwonho
    Kim, Sara
    Hamad, Giselle G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 211 (02) : 315 - 320
  • [25] Crowdsourced assessment of surgical skills: A systematic review
    Olsen, Rikke G.
    Genet, Malthe F.
    Konge, Lars
    Bjerrum, Flemming
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 224 (05) : 1229 - 1237
  • [26] Video-based assessment for laparoscopic fundoplication: initial development of a robust tool for operative performance assessment
    Ritter, E. Matthew
    Gardner, Aimee K.
    Dunkin, Brian J.
    Schultz, Linda
    Pryor, Aurora D.
    Feldman, Liane
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (07): : 3176 - 3183
  • [27] Objective Assessment of Robotic Surgical Technical Skill: A Systematic Review
    Chen, Jian
    Cheng, Nathan
    Cacciamani, Giovanni
    Oh, Paul
    Lin-Brande, Michael
    Remulla, Daphne
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Hung, Andrew J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (03) : 461 - 469
  • [28] Observational tools for assessment of procedural skills: a systematic review
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Miskovic, Danilo
    Darzi, Ara
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    Hanna, George B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 202 (04) : 469 - U161
  • [29] Video-based testing in sporting officials: A systematic review
    Kittel, Aden
    Larkin, Paul
    Elsworthy, Nathan
    Spittle, Michael
    PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2019, 43 : 261 - 270
  • [30] Performance comparison of various feature detector-descriptors and temporal models for video-based assessment of laparoscopic skills
    Loukas, Constantinos
    Georgiou, Evangelos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2016, 12 (03) : 387 - 398