Dynamics of aquaculture governance

被引:17
作者
Jolly, Curtis M. [1 ,9 ]
Nyandat, Beatrice [2 ]
Yang, Zhengyong [3 ]
Ridler, Neil [4 ]
Matias, Felipe [5 ,6 ]
Zhang, Zhiyi [7 ]
Murekezi, Pierre [8 ]
Menezes, Ana [8 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Agr Econ & Rural Sociol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] State Dept Fisheries Aquaculture & Blue Econ, Nairobi, Kenya
[3] Shanghai Ocean Univ, Dept Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Univ New Brunswick, Dept Econ, St John, NB, Canada
[5] FUNCAP, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[6] Univ Fed Ceara, Fisheries & Engn, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[7] Shanghai Ocean Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[8] FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture Div, Rome, Italy
[9] Auburn Univ, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
accountability; dynamic governance; regulations; regulatory framework; sustainability; MULTI-TROPHIC AQUACULTURE; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; VALUE-CHAINS; ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION; MARINE AQUACULTURE; SHRIMP AQUACULTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; EUROPEAN AQUACULTURE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES;
D O I
10.1111/jwas.12967
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Aquaculture is a growing industry with an annual growth rate that is far superior to the population growth rate. Most production occurs in lower- and middle-income countries, and therefore, they can improve the efficiency and modernize the production systems to increase exports to earn foreign exchange earnings for economic and social development. The institutional arrangements should be part of the mechanisms that ensure sustainable aquaculture growth, through the participation of all stakeholders. Sustainability is possible with good and dynamic governance through which the industry embraces the basic principles of governance, equity, accountability, efficiency, and predictability. Over the past decade, several countries made changes in governance and implemented regulations through their action plans to improve aquaculture productivity, and stakeholders profited from the changes made along the value chain. For the producers to benefit from the value-added products, they complied with the regulations imposed by the importing countries, international regulatory bodies, or their own consumers. Standards increased, and the implementation of certification resulted in changes in the industrial structure. These standards, which inflict regulatory cost on producers, stimulated an improvement in productivity and product quality. However, during the last decade, production growth declined from 5.8% from 2001 to 2010 to 4.5% from 2011 to 2018, resulting in the elusive realization of the potential of meeting the sustainable development targets. There is a need for a paradigm shift that encourages small-scale producers to engage in sustainable intensive aquaculture. The challenge is, therefore, to move toward production intensification and expansion, and the harmonization of national and international regulations to ensure the supply of safe and adequate fish to consumers, while maintaining a sustainable production system, and at the same time conserving the environment and maintaining social and economic stability. With good governance and political will, the social, economic, and environmental objectives for attaining the Sustainable Development Goals during the period 2020-2030 are possible if governments integrate sustainable aquaculture developments within an expanded aquatic and terrestrial food security policy framework using systems thinking and open innovation approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 481
页数:55
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Dynamics of Urban Ecosystem Governance in Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    Tilie, Nico
    AMBIO, 2014, 43 (04) : 542 - 555
  • [32] Dynamics of experimental governance: A meta-study of functions and uses of climate governance experiments
    Laakso, Senja
    Berg, Annukka
    Annala, Mikko
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 169 : 8 - 16
  • [33] Innovation policy in the Norwegian aquaculture industry: Reshaping aquaculture production innovation networks
    Afewerki, Samson
    Osmundsen, Tonje
    Olsen, Marit Schei
    Storkersen, Kristine Vedal
    Misund, Andreas
    Thorvaldsen, Trine
    MARINE POLICY, 2023, 152
  • [34] Hybrid governance and performances of environmental accounting
    Ghosh, Ritwick
    Wolf, Steven
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 284
  • [35] Integrating multiple stressors in aquaculture to build the blue growth in a changing sea
    Sara, Gianluca
    Mangano, M. Cristina
    Johnson, Magnus
    Mazzola, Antonio
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2018, 809 (01) : 5 - 17
  • [36] Conservation aquaculture: Shifting the narrative and paradigm of aquaculture's role in resource management
    Froehlich, Halley E.
    Gentry, Rebecca R.
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 215 : 162 - 168
  • [37] Dynamics of Research in Aquaculture in North Africa and Support for Sustainable Development and Innovation
    Kara, Mohamed Hichem
    Lacroix, Denis
    Rey-Valette, Helene
    Mathe, Syndhia
    Blancheton, Jean Paul
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE, 2018, 26 (03) : 309 - 318
  • [38] Power Dynamics and Corporate Power in Governance Processes: Evidence From US Environmental Governance Systems
    Ba, Yuhao
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2022, 52 (03) : 206 - 220
  • [39] Socioeconomic dynamics and characterization of land-based aquaculture in Western Kenya
    Abwao, Jacob
    Musa, Safina
    Ondiba, Robert
    Ogari, Zach
    AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM HEALTH & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 24 (01) : 64 - 72
  • [40] Resource governance dynamics: The challenge of 'new oil' in Uganda
    Van Alstine, James
    Manyindo, Jacob
    Smith, Laura
    Dixon, Jami
    AmanigaRuhanga, Ivan
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2014, 40 : 48 - 58