Dynamics of aquaculture governance

被引:17
|
作者
Jolly, Curtis M. [1 ,9 ]
Nyandat, Beatrice [2 ]
Yang, Zhengyong [3 ]
Ridler, Neil [4 ]
Matias, Felipe [5 ,6 ]
Zhang, Zhiyi [7 ]
Murekezi, Pierre [8 ]
Menezes, Ana [8 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Agr Econ & Rural Sociol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] State Dept Fisheries Aquaculture & Blue Econ, Nairobi, Kenya
[3] Shanghai Ocean Univ, Dept Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Univ New Brunswick, Dept Econ, St John, NB, Canada
[5] FUNCAP, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[6] Univ Fed Ceara, Fisheries & Engn, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[7] Shanghai Ocean Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[8] FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture Div, Rome, Italy
[9] Auburn Univ, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
accountability; dynamic governance; regulations; regulatory framework; sustainability; MULTI-TROPHIC AQUACULTURE; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; VALUE-CHAINS; ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION; MARINE AQUACULTURE; SHRIMP AQUACULTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; EUROPEAN AQUACULTURE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES;
D O I
10.1111/jwas.12967
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Aquaculture is a growing industry with an annual growth rate that is far superior to the population growth rate. Most production occurs in lower- and middle-income countries, and therefore, they can improve the efficiency and modernize the production systems to increase exports to earn foreign exchange earnings for economic and social development. The institutional arrangements should be part of the mechanisms that ensure sustainable aquaculture growth, through the participation of all stakeholders. Sustainability is possible with good and dynamic governance through which the industry embraces the basic principles of governance, equity, accountability, efficiency, and predictability. Over the past decade, several countries made changes in governance and implemented regulations through their action plans to improve aquaculture productivity, and stakeholders profited from the changes made along the value chain. For the producers to benefit from the value-added products, they complied with the regulations imposed by the importing countries, international regulatory bodies, or their own consumers. Standards increased, and the implementation of certification resulted in changes in the industrial structure. These standards, which inflict regulatory cost on producers, stimulated an improvement in productivity and product quality. However, during the last decade, production growth declined from 5.8% from 2001 to 2010 to 4.5% from 2011 to 2018, resulting in the elusive realization of the potential of meeting the sustainable development targets. There is a need for a paradigm shift that encourages small-scale producers to engage in sustainable intensive aquaculture. The challenge is, therefore, to move toward production intensification and expansion, and the harmonization of national and international regulations to ensure the supply of safe and adequate fish to consumers, while maintaining a sustainable production system, and at the same time conserving the environment and maintaining social and economic stability. With good governance and political will, the social, economic, and environmental objectives for attaining the Sustainable Development Goals during the period 2020-2030 are possible if governments integrate sustainable aquaculture developments within an expanded aquatic and terrestrial food security policy framework using systems thinking and open innovation approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 481
页数:55
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Propelling India's blue economy: technological and governance perspectives in fisheries and aquaculture
    Gopalakrishnan, A.
    Parappurathu, Shinoj
    Menon, Muktha
    Suresh, V. V. R.
    George, Grinson
    Kizhakudan, Shoba Joe
    Sukumaran, Sandhya
    Ignatius, Boby
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2024, 126 (02): : 169 - 176
  • [22] Archetypes of aquaculture development across 150 countries
    Partelow, Stefan
    Nagel, Ben
    Gentry, Rebecca
    Gephart, Jessica
    Rocha, Juan
    AQUACULTURE, 2025, 595
  • [23] Esports Governance: Exploring Stakeholder Dynamics
    Peng, Qi
    Dickson, Geoff
    Scelles, Nicolas
    Grix, Jonathan
    Brannagan, Paul Michael
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (19)
  • [24] Emerging trends in aquaculture value chain research
    Bush, Simon R.
    Belton, Ben
    Little, David C.
    Islam, Md Saidul
    AQUACULTURE, 2019, 498 : 428 - 434
  • [25] Emergy synthesis for aquaculture: A review on its constraints and potentials
    David, Luiz H.
    Pinho, Sara M.
    Agostinho, Feni
    Kimpara, Janaina Mitsue
    Keesman, Karel J.
    Garcia, Fabiana
    REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 2021, 13 (02) : 1119 - 1138
  • [26] An analysis of the European aquaculture industry using the aquaculture performance indicators
    Nielsen, Rasmus
    Guillen, Jordi
    Garcia, Ignacio Llorente
    Asche, Frank
    Garlock, Taryn
    Kreiss, Cornelia M.
    Novakovic, Svjetlana Visnic
    Danatskos, Christos
    Cozzolino, Maria
    Pokki, Heidi
    Kankainen, Markus
    Dennis, John
    Jackson, Emmet
    Mytlewski, Adam
    Kulikowski, Tomasz
    Rakowski, Marcin
    Tveteras, Ragnar
    AQUACULTURE ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [27] Political dynamics and governance of World Heritage ecosystems
    Morrison, T. H.
    Adger, W. N.
    Brown, K.
    Hettiarachchi, M.
    Huchery, C.
    Lemos, M. C.
    Hughes, T. P.
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (11) : 947 - 955
  • [28] Drivers and Dynamics of Collaborative Governance in Environmental Management
    Nicola Ulibarri
    Mark T. Imperial
    Saba Siddiki
    Hayley Henderson
    Environmental Management, 2023, 71 : 495 - 504
  • [29] Drivers and Dynamics of Collaborative Governance in Environmental Management
    Ulibarri, Nicola
    Imperial, Mark T.
    Siddiki, Saba
    Henderson, Hayley
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 71 (3) : 495 - 504
  • [30] The Dynamics of Urban Ecosystem Governance in Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Niki Frantzeskaki
    Nico Tilie
    AMBIO, 2014, 43 : 542 - 555