Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defect: a systematic review of clinical evidence

被引:7
|
作者
Gkegkes, Ioannis D. [1 ,2 ]
Psomiadou, Victoria [3 ]
Minis, Evelyn [4 ]
Iavazzo, Christos [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Colorectal Surg, 17C James House, Exeter EX2 5DS, Devon, England
[2] Athens Colorectal Lab, Athens, Greece
[3] Metaxa Canc Hosp, Gynaecol Oncol Dept, Piraeus, Greece
[4] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Hlth, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
Cesarean scar defect; Cesarean section; Cesarean delivery; Robotic; Robotic surgery; Robotic assisted laparoscopy; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; PLACENTA-ACCRETA; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-022-01502-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
We aim to assess the available evidence concerning the robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect. A systematic PubMed and Scopus search was conducted. All databases were assessed up to May 23, 2022. Studies reporting data on robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect were included in this review. Data of 34 patients are presented. The mean age of the patients was 34.8 years old. The mean number of times a woman has been pregnant (gravidity) was 3.1, while the mean number of parity among the included women was 1.9. The mean number of previous cesarean sections among the included women is 1.8. The commonest symptoms at presentation of cesarean scar defect were vaginal bleeding, dysmenorrhea, abdominal pain, secondary infertility amenorrhea and ectopic cesarean scar pregnancy. The gestational age at time of surgery ranged between 6 and 14 weeks. The mean operative time was 165.2 min, while the reported blood loss during the operation ranged between 0 and 400 ml. Bladder perforation was the only intraoperative complication reported (1 out of 34, 2.9%). No conversion to open was reported. The mean interval between the last cesarean section and the development of cesarean scar defect was 22.8 months. Subsequent pregnancy after robotic assisted repair was reported in 16 out of 34 patients (47.1%). Robot-assisted treatment for cesarean scar defect has acceptable effectiveness and risks. Based on available data, uterus-sparing therapy should be considered in patients with cesarean scar pregnancies or symptomatic cesarean scar defect who wish to preserve their fertility. Finally, the role of a combined robotic and hysteroscopic correction of cesarean scar defect for reducing the blood loss and reducing the following obstetrical complications warrants future research.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 751
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic and robot-assisted transperitoneal lateral adrenalectomy: a large clinical series from a single center
    Niglio, Antonello
    Grasso, Marica
    Costigliola, Luciana
    Zenone, Pasquale
    De Palma, Maurizio
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2020, 72 (01) : 193 - 198
  • [42] Multimodal Robot-Assisted Instrument Interaction for Solo Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
    De Smet, Jef
    Page, Ann-Sophie
    Voros, Viktor
    Ourak, Mouloud
    Deprest, Jan
    Poorten, Emmanuel Vander
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIONICS, 2023, 5 (02): : 289 - 300
  • [43] Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Urachal Excision in Children
    Ahmed, Haris
    Howe, Adam S.
    Dyer, Lori L.
    Fine, Ronnie G.
    Gitlin, Jordan S.
    Schlussel, Richard N.
    Zelkovic, Paul F.
    Palmer, Lane S.
    UROLOGY, 2017, 106 : 103 - 106
  • [44] Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
    Asensio, Marino
    Gander, Romy
    Royo, Gloria F.
    Lloret, Josep
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2015, 11 (02) : 69.e1 - 69.e6
  • [45] Gynecological and obstetrical outcomes after laparoscopic repair of a cesarean scar defect in a series of 38 women
    Donnez, Olivier
    Donnez, Jacques
    Orellana, Renan
    Dolmans, Marie-Madeleine
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 107 (01) : 289 - +
  • [46] Pregnancy following cesarean scar defect (niche) repair: a cohort study
    Goldenberg, Motti
    Timor, Idan
    Mashiach, Roy
    Cohen, Shlomo
    Sasson, Aya Mohr
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (05) : 1581 - 1586
  • [47] Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Approach for Splenectomy in Children: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ghidini, Filippo
    Bisoffi, Silvia
    Gamba, Piergiorgio
    Fascetti Leon, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 32 (11): : 1203 - 1210
  • [48] Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    De Carlo, Francesco
    Celestino, Francesco
    Verri, Cristian
    Masedu, Francesco
    Liberati, Emanuele
    Di Stasi, Savino Mauro
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 93 (04) : 373 - 383
  • [49] Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic major hepatectomies: Systematic review with meta-analysis
    Coletta, Diego
    Sandri, Giovanni Battista Levi
    Giuliani, Giuseppe
    Guerra, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (03)
  • [50] Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review and pooled analysis of minor and major hepatectomies
    Nota, Carolijn L.
    Rinkes, Inne H. Borel
    Molenaar, Izaak Q.
    van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
    Fong, Yuman
    Hagendoorn, Jeroen
    HPB, 2016, 18 (02) : 113 - 120