Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defect: a systematic review of clinical evidence

被引:7
|
作者
Gkegkes, Ioannis D. [1 ,2 ]
Psomiadou, Victoria [3 ]
Minis, Evelyn [4 ]
Iavazzo, Christos [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Colorectal Surg, 17C James House, Exeter EX2 5DS, Devon, England
[2] Athens Colorectal Lab, Athens, Greece
[3] Metaxa Canc Hosp, Gynaecol Oncol Dept, Piraeus, Greece
[4] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Hlth, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
Cesarean scar defect; Cesarean section; Cesarean delivery; Robotic; Robotic surgery; Robotic assisted laparoscopy; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; PLACENTA-ACCRETA; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-022-01502-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
We aim to assess the available evidence concerning the robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect. A systematic PubMed and Scopus search was conducted. All databases were assessed up to May 23, 2022. Studies reporting data on robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect were included in this review. Data of 34 patients are presented. The mean age of the patients was 34.8 years old. The mean number of times a woman has been pregnant (gravidity) was 3.1, while the mean number of parity among the included women was 1.9. The mean number of previous cesarean sections among the included women is 1.8. The commonest symptoms at presentation of cesarean scar defect were vaginal bleeding, dysmenorrhea, abdominal pain, secondary infertility amenorrhea and ectopic cesarean scar pregnancy. The gestational age at time of surgery ranged between 6 and 14 weeks. The mean operative time was 165.2 min, while the reported blood loss during the operation ranged between 0 and 400 ml. Bladder perforation was the only intraoperative complication reported (1 out of 34, 2.9%). No conversion to open was reported. The mean interval between the last cesarean section and the development of cesarean scar defect was 22.8 months. Subsequent pregnancy after robotic assisted repair was reported in 16 out of 34 patients (47.1%). Robot-assisted treatment for cesarean scar defect has acceptable effectiveness and risks. Based on available data, uterus-sparing therapy should be considered in patients with cesarean scar pregnancies or symptomatic cesarean scar defect who wish to preserve their fertility. Finally, the role of a combined robotic and hysteroscopic correction of cesarean scar defect for reducing the blood loss and reducing the following obstetrical complications warrants future research.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 751
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robot-assisted repair of hiatal hernia: Advantages and disadvantages in comparison to conventional laparoscopic repair: A literature review
    Pelzner, Kim
    Mueller, Dolores T.
    Fuchs, Claudia
    Maus, Martin
    Bruns, Christiane J.
    Fuchs, Hans F.
    Leers, Jessica M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL AND HERNIA SURGERY, 2023, 6 (02) : 77 - 80
  • [32] Laparoscopic repair with hysteroscopy of cesarean scar diverticulum
    Liu, Song-jun
    Lv, Wen
    Li, Wu
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2016, 42 (12) : 1719 - 1723
  • [33] Comparison of transvaginal repair versus laparoscopic repair of lower-segment cesarean scar defects
    Zhang, Duoduo
    Liang, Shuo
    Zhu, Lan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2019, 145 (02) : 199 - 204
  • [34] Feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery - An evaluation of 35 robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomies
    Ruurda, JP
    Broeders, IAMJ
    Simmermacher, RPM
    Rinkes, IHMB
    Van Vroonhoven, TJMV
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2002, 12 (01) : 41 - 45
  • [35] Prevalence, definition, and etiology of cesarean scar defect and treatment of cesarean scar disorder: A narrative review
    Tsuji, Shunichiro
    Nobuta, Yuri
    Hanada, Tetsuro
    Takebayashi, Aike
    Inatomi, Ayako
    Takahashi, Akimasa
    Amano, Tsukuru
    Murakami, Takashi
    REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [36] The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review
    Burghgraef, Thijs A.
    Sikkenk, Daan J.
    Verheijen, Paul M.
    El Moumni, Mostafa
    Hompes, Roel
    Consten, Esther C. J.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (09): : 6337 - 6360
  • [37] Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic minor hepatectomy A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Ji-Ming
    Li, Jiang-Fa
    Yuan, Guan-Dou
    He, Song-Qing
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (17) : E25648
  • [38] A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants
    Chandrasekharam, V. V. S.
    Babu, Ramesh
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2021, 17 (04) : 502 - 510
  • [39] Robot-assisted laparoscopic cardiomyotomy
    Wykypiel, Heinz F.
    Bodner, Johannes
    Augustin, Florian
    Renz, Oliver
    Hoeller, Elisabeth
    Schmid, Thomas
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2009, 121 (21-22) : 707 - 714
  • [40] Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Alimoglu, Orhan
    Caliskan, Mujgan
    Atak, Ibrahim
    Tekesin, Kemal
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 26 (03) : 165 - 167