Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defect: a systematic review of clinical evidence

被引:7
|
作者
Gkegkes, Ioannis D. [1 ,2 ]
Psomiadou, Victoria [3 ]
Minis, Evelyn [4 ]
Iavazzo, Christos [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Colorectal Surg, 17C James House, Exeter EX2 5DS, Devon, England
[2] Athens Colorectal Lab, Athens, Greece
[3] Metaxa Canc Hosp, Gynaecol Oncol Dept, Piraeus, Greece
[4] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Hlth, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
Cesarean scar defect; Cesarean section; Cesarean delivery; Robotic; Robotic surgery; Robotic assisted laparoscopy; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; PLACENTA-ACCRETA; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-022-01502-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
We aim to assess the available evidence concerning the robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect. A systematic PubMed and Scopus search was conducted. All databases were assessed up to May 23, 2022. Studies reporting data on robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect were included in this review. Data of 34 patients are presented. The mean age of the patients was 34.8 years old. The mean number of times a woman has been pregnant (gravidity) was 3.1, while the mean number of parity among the included women was 1.9. The mean number of previous cesarean sections among the included women is 1.8. The commonest symptoms at presentation of cesarean scar defect were vaginal bleeding, dysmenorrhea, abdominal pain, secondary infertility amenorrhea and ectopic cesarean scar pregnancy. The gestational age at time of surgery ranged between 6 and 14 weeks. The mean operative time was 165.2 min, while the reported blood loss during the operation ranged between 0 and 400 ml. Bladder perforation was the only intraoperative complication reported (1 out of 34, 2.9%). No conversion to open was reported. The mean interval between the last cesarean section and the development of cesarean scar defect was 22.8 months. Subsequent pregnancy after robotic assisted repair was reported in 16 out of 34 patients (47.1%). Robot-assisted treatment for cesarean scar defect has acceptable effectiveness and risks. Based on available data, uterus-sparing therapy should be considered in patients with cesarean scar pregnancies or symptomatic cesarean scar defect who wish to preserve their fertility. Finally, the role of a combined robotic and hysteroscopic correction of cesarean scar defect for reducing the blood loss and reducing the following obstetrical complications warrants future research.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 751
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transfer of skills between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review
    Pia Iben Pietersen
    Peter Hertz
    Rikke Groth Olsen
    Louise Birch Møller
    Lars Konge
    Flemming Bjerrum
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 9030 - 9042
  • [22] Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Horiguchi, A.
    Uyama, I.
    Miyakawa, S.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2011, 18 (02) : 287 - 291
  • [23] Laparoscopic treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: A scoping review
    Barakat, Elie
    Riemma, Gaetano
    Lagana, Antonio Simone
    Nehme, Lea
    Khazzaka, Aline
    Noventa, Marco
    Lukanovic, David
    Hakimi, Sevil
    Sleiman, Zaki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2025, 307 : 154 - 163
  • [24] Robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty
    Ignacio Pascual-Piedrola, Juan
    Merino-Narro, Imanol
    Hevia-Suarez, Mateo
    Javier Ancizu-Viarckert, Francisco
    Garcia-Cortes, Angel
    Domenech-Lopez, Pablo
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2017, 70 (04): : 454 - 461
  • [25] Laparoscopic repair of cesarean section scar defect and the surgical outcome in 146 patients
    Zhang, Xuyin
    Wu, Chaoying
    Yang, Mengyi
    Xu, Heyang
    He, Yuan
    Ding, Jingxin
    Hua, Keqin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (03): : 4408 - 4416
  • [26] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty
    Greenwald, David
    Mohanty, Amrita
    Andolfi, Ciro
    Gundeti, Mohan S.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (04) : 448 - 461
  • [27] A Comparative Study of Transvaginal Repair and Laparoscopic Repair in the Management of Patients With Previous Cesarean Scar Defect
    Zhang, Ying
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) : 535 - 541
  • [28] Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
    Gonzalez, Natalia
    Tulandi, Togas
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (05) : 731 - 738
  • [29] Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Repair of Rare Post-Cesarean Section Vesicocervical and Vesicouterine Fistula: A Case Series of a Novel Technique
    Perveen, Kauser
    Gupta, Ridhima
    Al-Badr, Ahmed
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (02) : 477 - 482
  • [30] Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: Comparison with abdominal myomectomy
    Ranisavljevic, N.
    Mercier, G.
    Masia, F.
    Mares, P.
    De Tayrac, R.
    Triopon, G.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2012, 41 (05): : 439 - 444