Children, young people and parent engagement in health intervention design and implementation: A scoping review

被引:4
作者
Crowther, Daniel [1 ]
McCulloch, Holly [1 ]
Wong, Helen [2 ]
Mackay, Rebecca [1 ]
Johnson, Catie [1 ]
Chorney, Jill [3 ]
Ritchie, Krista [4 ]
Lawrence, Logan [5 ]
Bishop, Andrea [6 ]
Helwig, Melissa [7 ]
Curran, Janet [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IWK Hlth, Strengthening Transit Care Lab, 5850-5980 Univ Ave, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Hlth, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Psychiat, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Mt St Vincent Univ, Fac Educ, Halifax, NS, Canada
[5] Nova Scotia Hlth, Res & Innovat, Halifax, NS, Canada
[6] Nova Scotia Coll Pharmacists, Policy Dev & Res, Halifax, NS, Canada
[7] Dalhousie Univ, Res & Scholarly Commun, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
children; engagement; health interventions; parent; young people; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; PATIENT; PREVENTION; FRAMEWORK; FAMILY; CARE; ADOLESCENTS; RESEARCHERS; GUIDELINES; PARTNERS;
D O I
10.1111/hex.13572
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Engaging children and young people (CYP) with and without their parents in health research has the potential to improve the development and implementation of health interventions. However, to our knowledge, the scope of engagement activities used with this population and barriers to their engagement is unknown. The objective of this review was to identify and describe CYP engagement with and without their parents in the development and/or implementation of health interventions. Methods This scoping review included any primary research studies reporting on engaging CYP, with or without parents, in the design and/or implementation of health interventions. Healthcare professionals had to be involved over the course of the study and the study had to take place in either community, primary or tertiary care settings. The following databases were searched in May 2017, May 2020 and June 2021: Medline (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Embase (Elsevier). Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles and used a previously piloted extraction form to extract and summarize information from the included articles. Results Twenty-eight articles discussing twenty-four studies were included. CYP engagement throughout the research cycle was limited. There were no observed differences in the reported presence of engagement, types of interventions or outcomes of engagement between studies engaging CYP or CYP and parents. Studies engaging CYP and parents contained limited information on how these relationships affected outcomes of engagement. Engagement was enabled primarily by the maintenance of resources and relationships among stakeholders. Conclusions Although CYP engagement often influenced health intervention and implementation design, they are inconsistently engaged across the research cycle. It is unclear whether parental involvement enhances CYP engagement. Future research should consider reporting guidelines to clarify the level of CYP and/or parent engagement, and enhance CYP engagement by fostering synergistic and sustainable partnerships with key stakeholders. Patient or Public Contribution A parent partner with codesign experience contributed to the creation of the research questions, screened titles, abstracts and full texts, helped with data extraction and provided feedback on the manuscript.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条
[61]   How and why should we engage parents as co-researchers in health research? A scoping review of current practices [J].
Shen, Shuoqi ;
Doyle-Thomas, Krissy A. R. ;
Beesley, Lori ;
Karmali, Amir ;
Williams, Laura ;
Tanel, Nadia ;
McPherson, Amy C. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (04) :543-554
[62]   The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research [J].
Sheridan, Susan ;
Schrandt, Suzanne ;
Forsythe, Laura ;
Hilliard, Tandrea S. ;
Paez, Kathryn A. .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2017, 15 (02) :165-170
[63]  
Shier H., 2001, CHILD SOC, V15, P107, DOI DOI 10.1002/CHI.617
[64]   GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research [J].
Staniszewska, S. ;
Brett, J. ;
Simera, I. ;
Seers, K. ;
Mockford, C. ;
Goodlad, S. ;
Altman, D. G. ;
Moher, D. ;
Barber, R. ;
Denegri, S. ;
Entwistle, A. ;
Littlejohns, P. ;
Morris, C. ;
Suleman, R. ;
Thomas, V. ;
Tysall, C. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 358
[65]  
Tricco AC, 2018, ANN INTERN MED, V169, P467, DOI 10.7326/M18-0850
[66]  
United Nations, YOUTH
[67]  
Versnel J, 2011, OCCUP THER OTT, V13, P28
[68]   Youth social behaviour and network therapy (Y-SBNT): adaptation of a family and social network intervention for young people who misuse alcohol and drugs - a randomised controlled feasibility trial [J].
Watson, Judith ;
Toner, Paul ;
Day, Ed ;
Back, Donna ;
Brady, Louca-Mai ;
Fairhurst, Caroline ;
Renwick, Charlotte ;
Templeton, Lorna ;
Akhtar, Shabana ;
Lloyd, Charlie ;
Li, Jinshuo ;
Cocks, Kim ;
Ambegaokar, Sangeeta ;
Parrott, Steve ;
McArdle, Paul ;
Gilvarry, Eilish ;
Copello, Alex .
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2017, 21 (15) :1-+
[69]  
Williamson Heidi, 2015, Health Psychol Open, V2, p2055102915619092, DOI 10.1177/2055102915619092
[70]   The Evolution of Engagements and Social Bonds During Child-Parent Co-design [J].
Yip, Jason C. ;
Clegg, Tamara ;
Ahn, June ;
Uchidiuno, Judith Odili ;
Bonsignore, Elizabeth ;
Beck, Austin ;
Pauw, Daniel ;
Mills, Kelly .
34TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, CHI 2016, 2016, :3607-3619