Children, young people and parent engagement in health intervention design and implementation: A scoping review

被引:4
作者
Crowther, Daniel [1 ]
McCulloch, Holly [1 ]
Wong, Helen [2 ]
Mackay, Rebecca [1 ]
Johnson, Catie [1 ]
Chorney, Jill [3 ]
Ritchie, Krista [4 ]
Lawrence, Logan [5 ]
Bishop, Andrea [6 ]
Helwig, Melissa [7 ]
Curran, Janet [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IWK Hlth, Strengthening Transit Care Lab, 5850-5980 Univ Ave, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Hlth, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Psychiat, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Mt St Vincent Univ, Fac Educ, Halifax, NS, Canada
[5] Nova Scotia Hlth, Res & Innovat, Halifax, NS, Canada
[6] Nova Scotia Coll Pharmacists, Policy Dev & Res, Halifax, NS, Canada
[7] Dalhousie Univ, Res & Scholarly Commun, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
children; engagement; health interventions; parent; young people; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; PATIENT; PREVENTION; FRAMEWORK; FAMILY; CARE; ADOLESCENTS; RESEARCHERS; GUIDELINES; PARTNERS;
D O I
10.1111/hex.13572
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Engaging children and young people (CYP) with and without their parents in health research has the potential to improve the development and implementation of health interventions. However, to our knowledge, the scope of engagement activities used with this population and barriers to their engagement is unknown. The objective of this review was to identify and describe CYP engagement with and without their parents in the development and/or implementation of health interventions. Methods This scoping review included any primary research studies reporting on engaging CYP, with or without parents, in the design and/or implementation of health interventions. Healthcare professionals had to be involved over the course of the study and the study had to take place in either community, primary or tertiary care settings. The following databases were searched in May 2017, May 2020 and June 2021: Medline (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Embase (Elsevier). Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles and used a previously piloted extraction form to extract and summarize information from the included articles. Results Twenty-eight articles discussing twenty-four studies were included. CYP engagement throughout the research cycle was limited. There were no observed differences in the reported presence of engagement, types of interventions or outcomes of engagement between studies engaging CYP or CYP and parents. Studies engaging CYP and parents contained limited information on how these relationships affected outcomes of engagement. Engagement was enabled primarily by the maintenance of resources and relationships among stakeholders. Conclusions Although CYP engagement often influenced health intervention and implementation design, they are inconsistently engaged across the research cycle. It is unclear whether parental involvement enhances CYP engagement. Future research should consider reporting guidelines to clarify the level of CYP and/or parent engagement, and enhance CYP engagement by fostering synergistic and sustainable partnerships with key stakeholders. Patient or Public Contribution A parent partner with codesign experience contributed to the creation of the research questions, screened titles, abstracts and full texts, helped with data extraction and provided feedback on the manuscript.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Patient and Researcher Engagement in Health Research: A Parent's Perspective [J].
Amirav, Israel ;
Vandall-Walker, Virginia ;
Rasiah, Jananee ;
Saunders, Laura .
PEDIATRICS, 2017, 140 (03)
[2]   "Not Only Adults Can Make Good Decisions, We as Children Can Do That as Well" Evaluating the Process of the Youth-Led Participatory Action Research 'Kids in Action' [J].
Anselma, Manou ;
Chinapaw, Mai ;
Altenburg, Teatske .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (02)
[3]   Co-designing obesity prevention interventions together with children: intervention mapping meets youth-led participatory action research [J].
Anselma, Manou ;
Altenburg, Teatske M. ;
Emke, Helga ;
van Nassau, Femke ;
Jurg, Merlin ;
Ruiter, Robert A. C. ;
Jurkowski, Janine M. ;
Chinapaw, Mai J. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2019, 16 (01)
[4]   Framework for enhancing clinical practice guidelines through continuous patient engagement [J].
Armstrong, Melissa J. ;
Rueda, Juan-David ;
Gronseth, Gary S. ;
Mullins, C. Daniel .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (01) :3-10
[5]  
Aromataris E., 2020, JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, DOI [10.46658/JBIMES-20-01, DOI 10.46658/JBIMES-24-01, DOI 10.46658/JBIMES-20-01, DOI 10.46658/JBIMES-20-12]
[6]   Acceptability and Preliminary Efficacy of a Tailored Online HIV/STI Testing Intervention for Young Men who have Sex with Men: The Get Connected! Program [J].
Bauermeister, Jose A. ;
Pingel, Emily S. ;
Jadwin-Cakmak, Laura ;
Harper, Gary W. ;
Horvath, Keith ;
Weiss, Gretchen ;
Dittus, Patricia .
AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2015, 19 (10) :1860-1874
[7]   What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams? [J].
Black, Agnes ;
Strain, Kimberly ;
Wallsworth, Christine ;
Charlton, Sara-Grey ;
Chang, Wilma ;
McNamee, Kate ;
Hamilton, Clayon .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2018, 23 (03) :158-167
[8]   Involving young people in drug and alcohol research [J].
Brady, Louca-Mai ;
Templeton, Lorna ;
Toner, Paul ;
Watson, Judith ;
Evans, David ;
Percy-Smith, Barry ;
Copello, Alex .
DRUGS AND ALCOHOL TODAY, 2018, 18 (01) :28-38
[9]   Suicide Prevention Videos Developed by and for Adolescents A Qualitative Study [J].
Braun, Marlies ;
Till, Benedikt ;
Pirkis, Jane ;
Niederkrotenthaler, Thomas .
CRISIS-THE JOURNAL OF CRISIS INTERVENTION AND SUICIDE PREVENTION, 2021, 42 (02) :114-120
[10]  
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 2019, STRAT PAT OR RES CIH