Building "common knowledge" when responding to major road tunnel incidents: an inter-organisational focus group study

被引:5
作者
Eklund, Annika [1 ,2 ]
Karlsson, Sofia [2 ]
Gyllencreutz, Lina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ West, Dept Hlth Sci, Trollhattan, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Ctr Disaster Med, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Umea, Sweden
关键词
Collaboration; Common knowledge; Emergency organisations; Major incident; Road tunnel; COLLABORATION; PERSPECTIVE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1108/IJES-02-2022-0006
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Purpose Major incidents in tunnel environment will pose several challenges for the emergency service organisations in terms of heat, visibility and lack of experiences from working in confined environments. These aspects, in turn, could pose challenges to establish collaboration. This study aims to contribute to the field of collaborative tunnel responses by exploring how "common knowledge" (Edwards, 2011) is built by the emergency services organisations, that is, what the organisations consider important while working on a potentially common problem, and their motives for the interpretations and actions if a major tunnel incident occurs. Design/methodology/approach Participants from the road traffic control centre, emergency dispatch centre, emergency medical service, rescue service and police were included in the study. Data from four focus group sessions was analysed using thematic analysis. Findings The study revealed that the tunnel environment presents specific aspects of how common knowledge was produced related to lifesaving and safety. The themes structuring mechanisms to reduce uncertainty, managing information for initial priorities, aligning responsibilities without hampering each other's work and adjusting actions to manage distance, illustrated how common knowledge was produced as crucial aspects to a collaborative response. Organising management sites, grasping and communicating risks, accessing the injury victims, was challenged by the confined environment, physical distances and imbalance in access to information and preparedness activities in tunnel environments. Originality/value This study offers new insights of common knowledge, by illustrating a motive perspective on collaborative responses in tunnel incidents. Creating interoperability calls not just for readiness for action and tunnel safety, but also training activities acknowledging different interpretations and motives to further develop tunnel responses.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 160
页数:16
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Decision support system for emergency management: Road tunnels [J].
Alvear, Daniel ;
Abreu, Orlando ;
Cuesta, Arturo ;
Alonso, Virginia .
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 34 :13-21
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, 2003460 SFS GOV SWED
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 20181200 SFS GOV SWE
[4]   Why is collaboration minimised at the accident scene? A critical study of a hidden phenomenon [J].
Berlin, Johan M. ;
Carlstrom, Eric D. .
DISASTER PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 20 (02) :159-171
[5]   Emergency preparedness for tunnel fires - A systems-oriented approach [J].
Bjelland, Henrik ;
Nja, Ove ;
Heskestad, Atle William ;
Braut, Geir Sverre .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2021, 143
[6]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238]
[7]   THEORY DEVELOPMENT FOR SITUATIONAL AWARENESS IN MULTI-CASUALTY INCIDENTS [J].
Busby, Steven ;
Witucki-Brown, Janet .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING, 2011, 37 (05) :444-452
[8]   Analysis of critical incidents in tunnels to improve learning from experience [J].
Casse, Christelle ;
Caroly, Sandrine .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 116 :222-230
[9]   Following Routines: A Challenge in Cross-Sectorial Collaboration [J].
Danielsson, Erna .
JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 24 (01) :36-45
[10]   Limited medical perspective at a strategic level in relation to mass casualty incidents in Swedish tunnels [J].
Doohan, Isabelle Stjerna ;
Saveman, Britt-Inger ;
Gyllencreutz, Lina .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 15 (04) :360-374