Estimating the prevalence of diagnosed Alzheimer disease in England across deprivation groups using electronic health records: a clinical practice research datalink study

被引:4
作者
Leahy, Thomas Patrick [1 ]
Simpson, Alex [2 ]
Sammon, Cormac [3 ]
Ballard, Clive [4 ]
Gsteiger, Sandro [2 ]
机构
[1] Putnam LLC, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] F Hoffmann La Roche & Cie AG, Global Access, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Putnam LLC, Westport, Ireland
[4] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, Exeter, Devon, England
关键词
dementia; retrospective studies; epidemiology; INTERVAL ESTIMATION; UNITED-STATES; DEMENTIA; EUROPE; TRENDS; RATES; TIME;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075800
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Estimate the prevalence of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease (AD) and early Alzheimer's disease (eAD) overall and stratified by age, sex and deprivation and combinations thereof in England on 1 January 2020. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Primary care electronic health record data, the Clinical Practice Research database linked with secondary care data, Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and patient-level deprivation data, Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). Outcome measures The prevalence per 100000 of the population and corresponding 95% CIs for both diagnosed AD and eAD overall and stratified by covariates. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the sensitivity of the population definition and look-back period. Results There were 448797 patients identified in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink that satisfied the study inclusion criteria and were eligible for HES and IMD linkage. For the main analysis of AD and eAD, 379763 patients are eligible for inclusion in the denominator. This resulted in an estimated prevalence of diagnosed AD of 378.39 (95% CI, 359.36 to 398.44) per 100000 and eAD of 292.81 (95% CI, 276.12 to 310.52) per 100000. Prevalence estimates across main and sensitivity analyses for the entire AD study population were found to vary widely with estimates ranging from 137.48 (95% CI, 127.05 to 148.76) to 796.55 (95% CI, 768.77 to 825.33). There was significant variation in prevalence of diagnosed eAD when assessing the sensitivity with the look-back periods, as low as 120.54 (95% CI, 110.80 to 131.14) per 100 000, and as high as 519.01 (95% CI, 496.64 to 542.37) per 100000. Conclusions The study found relatively consistent patterns of prevalence across both AD and eAD populations. Generally, the prevalence of diagnosed AD increased with age and increased with deprivation for each age category. Women had a higher prevalence than men. More granular levels of stratification reduced patient numbers and increased the uncertainty of point prevalence estimates. Despite this, the study found a relationship between deprivation and prevalence of AD.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions [J].
Agresti, A ;
Coull, BA .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1998, 52 (02) :119-126
[2]  
Alzheimer Europe, 2018, The development of intercultural care and support for people with dementia from minority ethnic groups
[3]  
Alzheimer's Society, Alzheimer's society's view on demography 2020
[4]   The puzzle of sex, gender and Alzheimer's disease: Why are women more often affected than men? [J].
Andrew, Melissa K. ;
Tierney, Mary C. .
WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 14
[5]   2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures [J].
不详 .
ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2023, 19 (04) :1598-1695
[6]   2020 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures [J].
不详 .
ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2020, 16 (03) :391-460
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Tech. Rep.
[8]   Dementia and disadvantage in the USA and England: population-based comparative study [J].
Arapakis, Karolos ;
Brunner, Eric ;
French, Eric ;
McCauley, Jeremy .
BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (10)
[9]   Health disparities and health equity: Concepts and measurement [J].
Braveman, P .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 27 :167-194
[10]   Interval estimation for a binomial proportion - Comment - Rejoinder [J].
Brown, LD ;
Cai, TT ;
DasGupta, A ;
Agresti, A ;
Coull, BA ;
Casella, G ;
Corcoran, C ;
Mehta, C ;
Ghosh, M ;
Santner, TJ ;
Brown, LD ;
Cai, TT ;
DasGupta, A .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 16 (02) :101-133