A matter of perspective: Conceptualizing the role of citizens in E-government based on value positions

被引:26
作者
Distel, Bettina [1 ]
Lindgren, Ida [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Dept Informat Syst, Munster, Germany
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Digital public services; Citizen; User; E-government; Value position; Theory-building; PUBLIC E-SERVICES; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; UNITED-STATES; SECTOR; GOVERNANCE; ENGAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; CUSTOMER; AGE; COPRODUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.giq.2023.101837
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Citizens are oftentimes the central unit of analysis in e-government research and treated as one of the stake-holders receiving the most benefits from public sector digitalization. Still, they are mostly described in general terms, and it remains unclear what roles they can assume in relation to e-government. Different understandings of the citizens' role in e-government may impact research, because they entail different axioms mainly in relation to the technological frame for e-government but also for the citizens' relationship to public sector organizations in general. The aim of this article is to investigate and conceptualize the citizens' role in e-government based on public value positions. We depart from Rose et al.'s (2015) framework of value positions for managing e-gov-ernment. After reviewing and analyzing extensive research on e-government, we use this framework to contribute a clarification of the citizens' role in each value position. Our analysis shows that the ideal citizen is conceptualized differently across the four value positions; ranging from an external entity that should service themselves using digital self-services, to an engaged agent that should be actively involved in policy making and service delivery. In addition to this new perspective on the citizens' role in e-government, we contribute with an extension of the public value positions framework. The extended framework presented in this article makes these differences visible and we discuss consequences of the citizens' role in e-government for other dimensions of the framework.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]   E-government research insights: Text mining analysis [J].
Abu-Shanab, Emad ;
Harb, Yousra .
ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 38
[2]   Exploring the Motives of Citizen Reporting Engagement: Self-Concern and Other-Orientation [J].
Abu-Tayeh, Gabriel ;
Neumann, Oliver ;
Stuermer, Matthias .
BUSINESS & INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2018, 60 (03) :215-226
[3]   Defining the client in the public sector: A social-exchange perspective [J].
Alford, J .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2002, 62 (03) :337-346
[4]   Public Value Dimensions: Developing and Testing a Multi-Dimensional Classification [J].
Andersen, Lotte Bogh ;
Jorgensen, Torben Beck ;
Kjeldsen, Anne Mette ;
Pedersen, Lene Holm ;
Vrangbaek, Karsten .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2012, 35 (11) :715-728
[5]   Unpacking the digitalisation of public services: Configuring work during automation in local government [J].
Andersson, Christoffer ;
Hallin, Anette ;
Ivory, Chris .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2022, 39 (01)
[6]   Transforming the communication between citizens and government through AI-guided chatbots [J].
Androutsopoulou, Aggeliki ;
Karacapilidis, Nikos ;
Loukis, Euripidis ;
Charalabidis, Yannis .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2019, 36 (02) :358-367
[7]  
Bannister Frank, 2012, Information Polity, V17, P211, DOI 10.3233/IP-2012-000282
[8]   Administration by algorithm: A risk management framework [J].
Bannister, Frank ;
Connolly, Regina .
INFORMATION POLITY, 2020, 25 (04) :471-490
[9]  
Bannister F, 2017, PUB ADMIN INF TECH, V25, P27, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-54142-6_3
[10]   The great theory hunt: Does e-government really have a problem? [J].
Bannister, Frank ;
Connolly, Regina .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2015, 32 (01) :1-11