Clinical paper Validation of ICD-10 codes for studying foreign body airway obstructions: A health administrative data cohort study

被引:2
作者
Dunne, Cody L. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Cirone, Julia [1 ]
McRae, Andrew [1 ,2 ]
Blanchard, Ian [2 ,6 ]
Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna [2 ,7 ]
Sauro, Khara [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Emergency Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Oncol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Arnie Charbonneau Canc Inst, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Dept Surg, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] Alberta Hlth Serv, Emergency Med Serv, Calgary, AB, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[8] Foothills Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, 1409-29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
来源
RESUSCITATION PLUS | 2023年 / 16卷
关键词
Choking; ICD-10; Health administrative data; FBAO; Prehospital; Epidemiology;
D O I
10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100479
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Aim: To validate a case definition for foreign body airway obstructions (FBAO) using International Classification of Diseases version 10 (ICD-10) codes to accurately identify patients in administrative health databases and improve reporting on this injury.Methods: We identified prehospital patient encounters in Alberta, Canada between Jan 1, 2018 and Dec 31, 2021 by querying the provincial emergency medical services' (EMS) patient care records for FBAO-related presentations, EMS protocols, or treatments. We deterministically linked EMS patient encounters to data on emergency department visits and hospital admissions, which included ICD-10 codes. Two physicians independently reviewed encounters to determine true FBAO cases. We then calculated diagnostic accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios) of various algorithms.Results: We identified 3677 EMS patient encounters, 2121 were linked to hospital administrative databases. Of these encounters, 825 (38.9%) were true FBAO. The combination of two ICD-10 codes (T17 = foreign body in the respiratory tract or T18.0 = foreign body in the mouth) was the most specific algorithm (96.9% [95%CI 95.8-97.8%]), while the combination of all FBAO-related ICD-10 codes and R06.8 (other breathing abnormalities) was the most sensitive (75.0% [95%CI 71.9-78.0]). We identified an additional 453 (35.4%) FBAO cases not transported by EMS (due to death or transport refusal), and therefore not linked to the hospital administrative databases. Of these unlinked encounters, 44 (9.7%) cases resulted in the patient's death.Conclusions: FBAO can be identified with reasonable accuracy using health administrative data and ICD-10 codes. All algorithms had a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity, and failed to identify a third of FBAO cases, of which 10% resulted in death.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条