共 21 条
Clinical paper Validation of ICD-10 codes for studying foreign body airway obstructions: A health administrative data cohort study
被引:2
作者:
Dunne, Cody L.
[1
,2
,8
]
Cirone, Julia
[1
]
McRae, Andrew
[1
,2
]
Blanchard, Ian
[2
,6
]
Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
[2
,7
]
Sauro, Khara
[2
,3
,4
,5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Emergency Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Oncol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Arnie Charbonneau Canc Inst, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Dept Surg, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] Alberta Hlth Serv, Emergency Med Serv, Calgary, AB, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[8] Foothills Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, 1409-29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
来源:
RESUSCITATION PLUS
|
2023年
/
16卷
关键词:
Choking;
ICD-10;
Health administrative data;
FBAO;
Prehospital;
Epidemiology;
D O I:
10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100479
中图分类号:
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100602 ;
摘要:
Aim: To validate a case definition for foreign body airway obstructions (FBAO) using International Classification of Diseases version 10 (ICD-10) codes to accurately identify patients in administrative health databases and improve reporting on this injury.Methods: We identified prehospital patient encounters in Alberta, Canada between Jan 1, 2018 and Dec 31, 2021 by querying the provincial emergency medical services' (EMS) patient care records for FBAO-related presentations, EMS protocols, or treatments. We deterministically linked EMS patient encounters to data on emergency department visits and hospital admissions, which included ICD-10 codes. Two physicians independently reviewed encounters to determine true FBAO cases. We then calculated diagnostic accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios) of various algorithms.Results: We identified 3677 EMS patient encounters, 2121 were linked to hospital administrative databases. Of these encounters, 825 (38.9%) were true FBAO. The combination of two ICD-10 codes (T17 = foreign body in the respiratory tract or T18.0 = foreign body in the mouth) was the most specific algorithm (96.9% [95%CI 95.8-97.8%]), while the combination of all FBAO-related ICD-10 codes and R06.8 (other breathing abnormalities) was the most sensitive (75.0% [95%CI 71.9-78.0]). We identified an additional 453 (35.4%) FBAO cases not transported by EMS (due to death or transport refusal), and therefore not linked to the hospital administrative databases. Of these unlinked encounters, 44 (9.7%) cases resulted in the patient's death.Conclusions: FBAO can be identified with reasonable accuracy using health administrative data and ICD-10 codes. All algorithms had a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity, and failed to identify a third of FBAO cases, of which 10% resulted in death.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条